The use of higher order finite difference schemes is not dangerous

Journal of Complexity

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-10

  Mathé, Peter ^a   Pereverzev, Sergei V ^b  

^a WEIERSTRASS INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED ANALYSIS AND STOCHASTICS   (Germany)

^b JOHANN RADON INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Finite difference scheme; Numerical differentiation; Spline approximation

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS);

FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME; HIGHER ORDER FINITE DIFFERENCES; LOW ORDER; NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION; POSTERIORI; SMOOTH FUNCTIONS; SPLINE APPROXIMATIONS; STEP SIZE;

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD;

EID: 56949086279     PISSN: 0885064X     EISSN: 10902708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jco.2008.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Lu S., and Pereverzev S.V. Numerical differentiation from a viewpoint of regularization theory. Math. Comp. 75 256 (2006) 1853-1870 (electronic)
2. Butzer P.L., and Berens H. Semi-groups of operators and approximation. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften Band 145 (1967), Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York
3. Schumaker L.L. Spline Functions: Basic Theory (1981), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York Pure and Applied Mathematics, A Wiley-Interscience Publication
4. Lorentz G.G. Approximation of Funtions (1986), Chelsea Publ. Comp, New York
5. Tang L., and Baeder J.D. Uniformly accurate finite difference schemes for p-refinement. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20 3 (1999) 1115-1131 (electronic)
6. Qu R. A new approach to numerical differentiation and integration. Math. Comput. Modelling 24 10 (1996) 55-68
7. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2005), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 3-900051-07-0