Assimilation apparatus variability of beech transplants grown in variable light conditions of blue spruce shelter

Journal of Forest Science

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 491-496

  Spulak O ^a,b  

^a FORESTRY AND GAME MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

^b Výzkumný ústav lesního hospodá ství a myslivosti V v i   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Beech transplants; Fluorescence of chlorophyll; Leaf area; Light; Nutrient content of leaves

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL; FLUORESCENCE; FORESTRY; LIGHT; PLANTS (BOTANY);

ABSORPTION CAPACITY; BEECH TRANSPLANTS; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENCE OF CHLOROPHYLL; LEAF AREA; NUTRIENT CONTENT OF LEAVES; PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITY;

LIGHT MODULATORS;

CHLOROPHYLL; DECIDUOUS FOREST; FLUORESCENCE; FOLIAGE; LEAF AREA; LIGHT AVAILABILITY; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; POTASSIUM; TRANSPLANTATION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ALLOY; CHLOROPHYLLS; FAGUS; FLUORESCENCE; FORESTRY; GALLIUM; LIGHT; LUMINESCENCE; PHOSPHORUS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PLANTS; POTASSIUM;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; JIZERA MOUNTAINS; SUDETES;

FAGUS; PICEA; PICEA PUNGENS;

EID: 56849129916     PISSN: 12124834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/57/2008-jfs     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BALCAR V., KACÁLEK D., 2008. European beech planted into spruce stands exposed to climatic stresses in mountain areas. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 125:27-38.
2. BATTAGLIA M.A., MITCHELL R.J., MOU P.P., PECOT S.D., 2003. Light transmittance estimates in a longleaf pine woodland. Forest Science, 49:752-762.
3. EINHORN K.S., ROSENQVIST E., LEVERENZ J.W., 2004. Photoinhibition in seedlings of Fraxinus and Fagus under natural light conditions: implications for forest regeneration? Oecologia, 140: 241-251.
4. FRAZER G.W., TROFYMOW J.A., LETZMAN K.P., 1997. A method for estimating canopy openness, effective leaf area index, and photosynthetically active photon flux density using hemispherical photography and computerized image analysis techniques. Canadian Forest Service, Forest Ecosystem Processes Network: 81.
5. FRAZER G.W., CANHAM C.D., LERTZMAN K.P., 1999. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA). Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs. Users manual and program documentation. Millbrook - New York, Institute of Ecosystem Studies: 36
6. GAMPER R., MAYR S., BAUER H., 2000. Similar susceptibility to excess irradiance in sun and shade acclimated saplings of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and stone pine (Pinus cembra L.). Photosynthetica, 38: 373-378.
7. GLOSER J., 1998. Fyziologie rostlin. [Skripta.] Brno, Masarykova univerzita: 157.
8. GODDE D., DIVOUX S., HÖFERT M., KLEIN C., GONSIOR B., 1991. Quantitative and localized element analysis in cross-sections of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) needles with different degrees of damage. Trees: Structure and Function, 5: 95-100.
9. HAMERLYNCK E.P., KNAPP A.K., 1994. Leaf-level responses to light and temperature in two co-occurring Quercus (Fagaceae) species: implications for tree distribution patterns. Forest Ecology and Management, 68: 149-159.
10. HARDY J.P., MELLOH R., KOENIG G., MARKS D., WINSTRAL A., POMEROY J.W., LINK T., 2004. Solar radiation transmission through conifer canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 126: 257-270.
11. HLADKÁ D., ČAŇOVÁ I., 2005. Morphological and physiological parameters of beech leaves (Fagus sylvatica L.) in research demonstration object Pol'ana. Journal of Forest Science, 51: 168-176.
12. JOHNSON J.D., TOGNETTI R., MICHELOZZI M., PINZAUTIS., MINOTTA G., BORGHETTIM., 1997. Ecophysiological responses of Fagus sylvatica seedlings to changing light conditions. II. The interaction of light environment and soil fertility on seedlings physiology. Physiologia Plantarum, 101:124-134.
13. LICHTENTHALER H.K., BABANI F., LANGSDORF G., BUSCHMANN C., 2000. Measurement of differences in red chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic activity between sun and shade leaves by fluorescence imaging. Photosynthetica, 38: 521-529.
14. MAJER A., 1989. Size of beech leaf and variety of its form. Erdészeti és Faipari Tudományos Közlemények, 1-2: 5-25.
15. th International Congress on Photosynthesis, Budapest, Hungary, 17-22 August 1998. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 4081-4084.
16. ÖGREN E., 1990. Prediction of photoinhibition of photosynthesis from measurements of fluorescence quenching components. Planta, 184:538-544.
17. PETERS R., 1997. Beech Forests. Dordrecht, Boston, London, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 169.
18. RICH P.M., 1990. 2. Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. Remote Sensing Reviews, 5: 13-29.
19. SCHREIBER U., 2004. Pulse-Amplitude modulation (PAM) Fluorometry and Saturation Pulse method: An Overview. In: PAPAGEORGIOU G.C. (ed.), Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: a Signature of Photosynthesis. Dordrecht, Springer Verlag: 279-319.
20. SILVERTOWN J.W., CHARLESWORTH D., 2001. Introduction to Plant Population Biology. Blackwell Publishing: 347.
21. ŠPULÁK O., 2007. Impact of extremely snowy winter to Picea pungens (Engelm.) forest stand on the summit part of the Jizerské hory Mts. (Czech Republic). In: SANIGA M., JALOVIAR P., KUCEL S. (eds), Management of Frests in Changing Environmental Conditions. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen, Faculty of Forestry: 113-118.
22. TOGNETTI R., JOHNSON J.D., MICHELOZZI M., 1997. Ecophysiological responses of Fagus sylvatica seedlings to changing light conditions. I. Interactions between photosynthetic acclimation and photoinhibition during simulated canopy gap formation. Physiologia Plantarum, 101: 115-123.
23. WALZ Heinz GmbH, 2004. Imaging - PAM Chlorophyll Fluorometer. Instrument Description and Information for Users. 2.143 / 02.2003, 4. Ed. February 2004:134.