Phylogeny of Catalpa (Bignoniaceae) inferred from sequences of chloroplast ndhF and nuclear ribosomal DNA

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 341-348

  Li, Jianhua ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bignoniaceae; Catalpa; Eastern Asia North America; ndhF gene; nrDNA ITS sequences; Phylogeny; West Indies

Indexed keywords

BIGNONIACEAE; CATALPA; CATALPA BIGNONIOIDES; CATALPA BUNGEI; CATALPA DUCLOUXII; CATALPA FARGESII; CATALPA OVATA; CATALPA SPECIOSA; CHILOPSIS;

EID: 56849121534     PISSN: 16744918     EISSN: 17596831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1002.2008.08025     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Axelrod DI. 1960. The evolution of flowering plants. In: Tax S ed. Evolution after Darwin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1: 227-305.
2. Axelrod DI, Al-Shehbaz I, Raven PH. 1998. History of the modern flora of China. In: Wu C-I, Wu S-K eds. Floristic characteristics and diversity of East Asian plants: Proceedings of the IFCD (1996). Beijing: Springer-Verlag and China Higher Education Press. 43-55.
3. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
4. Baum DA, Small RL,Wendel JF. 1998. Biogeography and floral evolution of baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Systematic Biology 47: 181-207.
5. Beillmann AP. 1946. The Catalpa-an interesting tree. Missouri Botanical Garden Bulletin 34: 96-99.
6. Boufford DE, Spongberg SA. 1983. Eastern Asian-Eastern North American phytogeographical relationships-a history from the time of Linnaeus to the twentieth century. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 423-439.
7. Britton NL. 1918. The relatives of Catalpa in the West Indies. Journal of the New York Botanical Garden 19: 6-9.
8. Brown J. 1920. Catalpa speciosa in den Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft 29: 80-95.
9. Burk CJ, McMaster ND. 1988. The spread of Catalpa ovata G. Don in western Massachusetts and its biogeographic implications. Rhodora 90: 461-464.
10. Chaney RW. 1947. Tertiary centers and migration routes. Ecological Monographs 17:139-148.
11. Davis CC, Fritsch P, Li JH, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of Cercis (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 289-302.
12. Dode LA. 1907. Notes dendrologiques. Bulletin da la Société Dendrologigue de France 6: 190-209.
13. Donoghue MJ, Bell CD, Li JH. 2001. Phylogenetic patterns in Northern Hemisphere plant geography. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 (6, Suppl.): S41-S52.
14. Donoghue MJ, Smith SA. 2004. Patterns in the assembly of temperate forests around the Northern Hemisphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359: 1633-1644.
15. Duffield JW, Snyder EB. 1958. Benefits from hybridizing American forest tree species. Journal of Forestry 56: 809-815.
16. Duncan WH, Duncan MB. 1988. Trees of the southeastern United States. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
17. Elias TS, Newcombe LF. 1979. Foliar nectaries and glandular trichomes in Catalpa (Bignoniaceae). Acta Botanica Sinica 21: 215-224, plates I-IV.
18. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
19. Garman H. 1912. The catalpas and their allies. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 164: 201-223.
20. Gentry A. 1980. Bignoniaceae-Part I. Flora Neotropica, Monograph 25. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
21. Gentry A. 1992. Bignoniaceae-Part II. Flora Neotropica, Monograph 25. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
22. Gentry A, Tomb AS. 1979. Taxonomic implications of Bignoniaceae palynology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66: 756-777.
23. Gilmour JSL. 1936. Catalpa fargesii forma duclouxii. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 159: tab. 9458.
24. Gray A. 1846. Analogy between the flora of Japan and that of the United States. American Journal of Science and Arts (ser.2)2: 135-136.
25. Gray A. 1859. Diagnostic characters of new species of phanerogamous plants, collected in Japan by Charles Wright, botanist of the U. S. North Pacific Exploring Expedition, with observations upon the relations of the Japanese flora to that of North America, and of other parts of the northern temperate zone. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (N. S.) 6: 377-453.
26. Guo QF. 1999. Ecological comparisons between eastern Asia and North America: Historical and geographical perspectives. Journal of Biogeography 26: 199-206.
27. Henrickson J. 1985. A taxonomic revision of Chilopsis (Bignoniaceae). ALISO 11: 179-197.
28. Hong DY. 1993. Eastern Asian-North American disjunctions and their biological significance. Cathaya 5: 1-39.
29. Jones DF, Filley WO. 1920. Teas's hybrid Catalpa. Journal of Heredity 11: 16-24.
30. Li HL. 1952. Floristic relationships between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 42: 371-429.
31. Li J, Shoup S, Elias TS. 2006. Molecular confirmation of intergeneric hybrid × Chitalpa tashkentensis (Bignoniaceae). HortScience 41: 1-3.
32. Little EL. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Washington DC: Forest Service, USDA.
33. Manchester SR. 1999. Biogeographical relationships of North American Tertiary floras. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 472-522.
34. Manning SD. 2000. The genera of Bignoniaceae in the southeastern United States. Harvard Papers in Botany 5: 1-79.
35. Manos PS, Donoghue MJ. 2001. Progress in Northern Hemisphere biogeography: An introduction. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S1-S2.
36. Olmstead RG, Kim K-J, Jansen RK, Wagstaff SJ. 2000. The phytogeny of the Asteridae sensu lato based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution16: 96-112.
37. Olmstead RG, Sweere JA. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
38. Paclt J. 1952. Synopsis of the genus Catalpa (Bignoniaceae) III. Candollea 13: 241-285.
39. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Applications Note) 14: 817-818.
40. Qian H, Ricklefs RE. 1999. A comparison the taxonomic richness of vascular plants in China and the United States. The American Naturalist 154: 160-181.
41. Rehder A. 1913. Bignoniaceae. In: Sargent CS ed. Plantae Wilsonianae I. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
42. Roberts HE 1902. The hardy Catalpa. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 108: 99-214.
43. Rusanov NF. 1964. On the intergeneric hybrids of Catalpa and Chilopsis. Byulleten' Glavnogo Botaniceskogo Sada. 55: 44-47. (in Russian)
44. Sargent CS. 1889. A hybrid Catalpa. Garden & Forest 2: 303-305.
45. Smith EC, Nichols CJ. 1941. Species hybrids in forest trees. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 22: 443-454.
46. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ eds. 1998. Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
47. Spangler RE, Olmstead RG 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of Bignoniaceae based on the cpDNA gene sequences rbcL and ndhF. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 33-46.
48. Stevens PF. 1997. What kind of classification should the practising taxonomist use to be saved? In: Dransfield J, Coode MJE, Simpson DA eds. Plant diversity in Malesia III. Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens.
49. Stewart JR, Lister AM. 2001. Cryptic northern refugia and the origins of the modern biota. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 608-613.
50. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
51. Thomas RD, Allen CM. 1996. Atlas of the vascular flora of Louisiana. Vol. 2. Dicotyledons: Acanthaceae-Euphorbiaceae. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
52. Tiffney BH. 1985a. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66:73-94.
53. Tiffney BH. 1985b. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in tertiary and modern phytogeography of the northern hemisphere. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 243-273.
54. Wang W-C. 1990. Catalpa Scop. In: Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing: Science Press. 69: 13-18.
55. Warder JA. 1881. The western Catalpa, a memoir of the shavanon, or the Catalpa speciosa (Engelmann). Journal of the American Agricultural Association 1: 79-102.
56. Wen J. 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 421-455.
57. Weniger D. 1996. Catalpa (Catalpa bignonioides, Bignoniaceae) and bios d'arc (Madura pomifera, Moraceae) in early Texas records. Sida 17: 231-242.
58. White TJ, Brans T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T eds. PCR Protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. 315-322.
59. Wolfe JA. 1975. Some aspects of plant geography of the northern hemisphere during the Late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 264-279.
60. Wu CI. 1983. On the significance of Pacific intercontinental discontinuity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 577-590.
61. Xiang QY, Soltis DE. 2001. Dispersal-vicariance analysis of intercontinental disjuncts: historical biogeographical implications for angiosperms in the Northern Hemisphere. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S29-S39.