Towards a complete SCM ontology - The case of ontologising RosettaNet

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1467-1473

  Haller, Armin ^a   Gontarczyk, Jedrzej ^a   Kotinurmi, Paavo ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Ontology engineering; RosettaNet; Semantic web services; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS COLLABORATIONS; MESSAGE STRUCTURES; ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING; ONTOLOGY STRUCTURES; OUTER LAYERS; ROSETTANET; SPECIFICATION FRAMEWORKS;

INFORMATION THEORY; LOGISTICS; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS; WEB SERVICES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 56849119354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1363686.1364029     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. N. Anicic, N. Ivezic, and A. Jones. An Architecture for Semantic Enterprise Application Integration Standards, pp. 25-34. Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications. Springer, 2006.
2. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5):34-43, 2001.
3. J. Bosak, T. McGrath, and G. K. Holman. Universal business language v2.0, Dec. 2006.
4. D. Brickley and R. V. Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
5. J. de Bruijn, et al. The Web Service Modeling Language WSML. WSML Final Draft D16.1v0.2, DERI, Oct. 2005. Available from: http://www.wsmo.org/TR/ d16/d16.1/v0.21/.
6. J. de Bruijn, et al. Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO). Member submission, W3C, 2005. Available from: http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMO/.
7. S. Damodaran. B2B integration over the Internet with XML: RosettaNet successes and challenges. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference on Alternate track papers & posters, pp. 188-195. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
8. S. Damodaran. RosettaNet: Adoption Brings New Problems, New Solutions. In Proceedings of the XML 2005 Conference, pp. 1-14. Atlanta, USA, 2005.
9. D. Foxvog and C. Bussler. Ontologizing EDI Semantics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologising Industrial Standards, pp. 301-311. Springer, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2006.
10. T. R., Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-229, 1993.
11. A. Haller, P. Kotinurmi, T. Vitvar, and E. Oren. Handling heterogeneity in RosettaNet messages. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), pp. 1368 - 1374. ACM, Seoul, Korea, Mar. 2007.
12. M. Hepp. A methodology for deriving OWL ontologies from products and services categorization standards. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2005), pp. 1-12. 2005b.
13. G. Klyne and J. J. Carroll. Resource description framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/.
14. I. Niles and A. Pease. Towards a standard upper ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 2-9. New York, NY, USA, 2001.
15. P. F. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes, and I. Horrocks. OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/.
16. S. S. Y. Shim, V. S. Pendyala, M. Sundaram, and J. Z. Gao. Business-to-Business E-Commerce Frameworks. IEEE Computer, 33(10):40-47, 2000.
17. M. Stollberg, et al. Wsmo use case "virtual travel agency". WSMO Working Draft D3.3 v0.1, DERI, 2004. http://www.wsmo.org/ 2004/d3/d3.3/v0.1/.
18. D. Trastour, C. Bartolini, and C. Preist. Semantic Web support for the business-to-business e-commerce pre-contractual lifecycle. Computer Networks, 42(5):661-673, 2003.
19. D. Trastour, C. Preist, and D. Coleman. Using Semantic Web Technology to Enhance Current Business-to-Business Integration Approaches. In Proceedings of the 7th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 222-231. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.