Theoretical and experimental analysis of debris flow: Rheology and two-phase modelling

Irrigation and Drainage

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 555-570

  Mambretti, Stefano ^a   Larcan, Enrico ^a   De Wrachien, Daniele ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dam break; Debris flow; Rheological behaviour of the mixtures; Two phase modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 56849091549     PISSN: 15310353     EISSN: 15310361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ird.383     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alcrudo F, Garcia Navarro P. 1994. Computing two-dimensional flood propagation with a high resolution extension of McCormack's method. In Proceedings of International Conference on Modelling of Flooding Propagation over Initially Dry Areas, Milan.
2. Asmar BN, Lanston PA, Ergenzinger Z. 1997. The potential of the discrete method to simulate debris flow. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Debris Flow Hazard Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment, San Francisco, California, 7-9 August 1997, Chen I (ed.). ASCE: New York.
3. Aureli F, Mignosa P, Tomirotti M. 2000. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of dam-break flow with shocks. Journal of Hydraulic Research 38: 197-216.
4. Bagnold RA. 1955. Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 225: 49-63.
5. Bechteler W, Kulisch H, Nujic M. 1992. 2D dam-break flooding wave: comparison between experimental and calculated results. In Floods and Flood Management, Saul AJ (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht; 247-260.
6. Bellos V, Sakkas JG. 1987. 1D dam-break flood propagation on dry bed. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE 113(12): 1510-1524.
7. Bertalli L, Larcan E, Mambretti S. 2002. Leggi di resistenza al moto nelle colate di detriti conseguenti al crollo di dighe. 2. Modello numerico e confronti con i risultati sperimentali. In Proceedings 28th Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Potenza, 16-19 Sept. (in Italian).
8. Brufau P, Garcia-Navarro P, Ghilardi P, Natale L, Savi F. 2001. 1D Mathematical modelling of debris flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research 38: 435-446.
9. Chaudry MH. 1993. Open-Channel Flow. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
10. Chow VT. 1959. Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill: New York.
11. Courant R, Friedrichs KO, Lewy H. 1967. On the partial differential equation of mathematical physics. IBM Journal 11: 215-234.
12. Egashira S, Ashida K. 1987. Sediment transport in steep slope flumes. In Proceedings of RoC Japan Joint Seminar on Water Resources, Taipei, Republic of China, March 1987.
13. Garcia R, Kahawita RA. 1986. Numerical solution of the De Saint Venant equations with the McCormack finite-difference scheme. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids 6: 259-274.
14. Garcia Navarro P, Saviròn JM. 1992. McCormack methods for numerical simulation of 1D discontinuous unsteady open channel flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research 30(1): 313-327.
15. Ghilardi P, Natale L, Savi F. 1999. Two mathematical models simulating a real-world debris-flow. In Proceedings, IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics, Genoa, Italy.
16. Gregoretti C. 1998. Fronte di debris-flow. Composizione e celerità. L'acqua no. 6: 29-39.
17. Gregoretti C. 2000. Stima della velocità massima del fronte di una colata detritica che si propaga in un alveo torrentizio. Idra 2000, Proceedings of the XXVII Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Genova, 12-15 Sept. 2000, published for CNR - Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dalle Catastrofi Idrogeologiche.
18. Harten A. 1983. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 49: 357-394.
19. Jameson A. 1982. Transonic airfoil calculation using the Euler equations. In Numerical Models in Aeronautical Fluid Dynamics, Roe PL (ed.). Academic Press: New York, USA.
20. Larcan E, Mambretti S, Orsi E. 2002. Leggi di resistenza al moto nelle colate di detriti conseguenti al crollo di dighe. 1. Apparato sperimentale e primi risultati. In Proceedings of 28th Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Potenza, 16-19 Sept. (in Italian).
21. Larcan E, Mambretti S, Pulecchi M. 2006. A procedure for the evaluation of debris flow stratification. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Monitoring, Simulation, Prevention and Remediation of Dense and Debris Flow, Lorenzini G, Brebbia CA, Emmauouloudis DE (eds), 7-9 June, Rhodes, Greece.
22. McCormack RW. 1969. The effect of viscosity in hypervelocity impact cratering. AIAA Paper, 69-354, Cincinnati, Ohio.
23. Rodriguez C, Blanco A, Garcia R. 2006. Comparison of 1D debris flow modelling approaches using a high resolution and non-oscillatory numerical scheme on the finite volume methods. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Monitoring, Simulation, Prevention and Remediation of Dense and Debris Flow, Lorenzini G, Brebbia CA, Emmauouloudis DE, 7-9 June, Rhodes, Greece.
24. Roe PL. 1981. Approximate Riemann solver, parameters vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 43: 357-372.
25. Schamber DR, Katopodes ND. 1984. One-dimensional model for partially breached dams. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 110: 1086-1102.
26. Scotton P, Armanini A. 1992. Experimental investigation of roughness effects of debris flow channels. 6th Workshop on Two-Phase Flow Prediction, Erlangen.
27. Sweby PK. 1984. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis 21: 995-1011.
28. Takahashi T. 1991. Debris Flow. International Association for Hydraulic Research, Balkema: Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
29. Wan Z, Wang Y. 1984. Hyper-Concentrated Flow. International Association for Hydraulic Research monograph, Delft, the Netherlands.