Embedding SPARQL into XQuery/XSLT

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2271-2278

  Groppe, Sven ^a   Groppe, Jinghua ^a   Linnemann, Volker ^a   Kukulenz, Dirk ^a   Hoeller, Nils ^a   Reinke, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Embedded languages; Semantic web; SPARQL; XQuery; XSLT

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; INFORMATION THEORY; LINGUISTICS; MARKUP LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; XML;

EMBEDDED LANGUAGES; GRAPH QUERIES; LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS; RDF DATUMS; SPARQL; XML QUERIES; XQUERY; XSLT;

QUERY LANGUAGES;

EID: 56749181427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1363686.1364228     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Apache Software Foundation, Cocoon, http://cocoon.apache.org. 2006.
2. Axyana software., Qizx/open version 1.1, http://www.axyana.com/qizxopen,. 2006.
3. Beckett, D., (editor), RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised), W3C Recommendation, 10th February 2004.
4. G. Beged-Dove, D. Brickley, R. Dornfest, I. Davis, L. Dodds, J. Eisenzopf, D. Galbraith, R. V. Guha, K. MacLeod, E. Miller, A. Swartz, E. van der Vlist, RDF Site Summary (RSS) 1.0, http://purl.org/rss/1.0/spec, 2001.
5. D. Brickley and L. Miller, FOAF Vocabulary Specification 0.9, http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec.2007.
6. Carroll J. J., Klyne G., Resource Description Framework: Concepts and Abstract Syntax, W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004.
7. Chong E. I., Das S., Eadon G., Srinivasan J., An Efficient SQL-based RDF Querying Scheme, in VLDB, Trondheim, Norway, 2005.
8. Jirí Dokulil, Evaluation of SPARQL Queries Using Relational Databases. International Semantic Web Conference 2006, Athens, GA, U.S.A., 2006.
9. M. Droop, M. Flarer, J. Groppe, S. Groppe, V. Linnemann, J. Pinggera, F. Santner, M. Schier, F. Schöpf, H. Staffier and S. Zugal, Translating XPath Queries into SPARQL Queries, ODBASE 2007, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, 2007.
10. Stephen Harris, Nigel Shadbolt, SPARQL Query Processing with Conventional Relational Database Systems. WISE Workshops 2005, New York, U.S.A., 2005.
11. Steve Harris (editor), DAWG Testcases, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ DataAccess/tests/. 2006.
12. Kay, M. H., Saxon - The XSLT and XQuery Processor, http://saxon. sourceforge.net. 2006.
13. Microsoft, Biztalk, http://www.biztalk.org. 2006.
14. Microsoft. SQL Server 2005 Express, http://www.micro8oft.com/sql/express. 2007.
15. R. A. Parada, DOAC Vocabulary Specification, http://ramonantonio.nct/ doac/0.1/, 2006.
16. P. F. Patel-Schneider, J. Siméon, The Yin/Yang web: XML syntax and RDF semantics. WWW 2002, Honolulu, USA, 2002.
17. Cristian Pérez de Laborda, Stefan Conrad, Bringing Relational Data into the SemanticWeb using SPARQL and Relational.OWL. SWDB'06, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A., 2006.
18. Jorge Pérez, Marcelo Arenas, Claudio Gutierrez: Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. International Semantic Web Conference 2006, Athens, GA, USA, 2006.
19. Axel Polleres. From SPARQL to rules (and back). In WWW2007, Banff, Canada, 2007.
20. Prud'hommeaux E., Seaborne A., SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C Candidate Recommendation, 14 June 2007.
21. Software AG, Tamino XML Server, http://www.softwareag.com/tamino, 2007.
22. 3, http://labs.systemo.ne.at/wikipedia3. 2007.
23. Wilkinson, K., Sayers, C., Kuno, H. A., Reynolds, D., fficient RDF Storage and Retrieval in Jena2. In SWDB '03 co-located with VLDB 2003, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
24. W3C, XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, W3C Recommendation, 2007.
25. W3C, XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 2.0, W3C Recommendation, 2007.