Managed-lanes stated preference survey in Atlanta, Georgia measuring effects of different experimental designs and survey administration methods

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2049, 2008, Pages 144-152

  Hess, Stephane ^a   Smith, Colin ^b   Falzarano, Stacey ^b   Stubits, Jevan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; STATISTICS; TOLL HIGHWAYS;

ATLANTA; CHOICE MODEL; EFFICIENT DESIGNS; GEORGIA; GROWING BODIES; MANAGED LANES; MODELLING STUDIES; STATED PREFERENCE SURVEYS; STATISTICAL EVIDENCE; SURVEY TECHNIQUES;

SURVEYS;

EID: 56749177213     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2049-17     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Rose, J. M., and D. A. Hensher. Accounting for Individual Specific Non-Availability of Alternatives in Respondent's Choice Sets in the Construction of Stated Choice Experiments. In Survey Methods (P. R. Stopher and C. Stecher, eds.), Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2006.
2. Burgess, L., and D. J. Street. Optimal Designs for 2k Choice Experiments. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2003, pp. 2185-2206.
3. Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. Design Techniques for Stated Preference Methods in Health Economics. Health Economics, Vol. 12, 2002, pp. 281-294.
4. Ferrini. S., and R. Scarpa. Designs with a-Priori Information for Non-market Valuation with Choice-Experiments: A Monte Carlo Study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2007, pp. 342-363.
5. Kessels, R., P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient Choice Experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2006, pp. 409-419 (forthcoming).
6. Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior Beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, 2001, pp. 430-444.
7. Street, D. J., and L. Burgess. Optimal and Near Optimal Pairs for the Estimation of Effects in 2-Level Choice Experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 118, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 185-99.
8. Bierlaire, M. BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models. Proc., 3rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland, 2003.
9. Mackie, P., M. Wardman, A. S. Fowkes, G. Whelan, J. Nellthorp, and J. J. Bates. Values of Travel Time Savings in the UK. Report to U.K. Department of Transport. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds and John Bates Services, Leeds and Abingdon, United Kingdom., 2003.