Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) imaging is superior to spin-echo imaging in delineating brain metastases

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1167-1173

  Takeda, T ^b   Takeda, A ^b   Nagaoka, T ^b   Kunieda, E ^a   Takemasa, K ^b   Watanabe, M ^b   Hatou, T ^b   Oguro, S ^b   Katayama, M ^b  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Brain; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metastasis; MP RAGE

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; GADOLINIUM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETS; PATHOLOGY; RESONANCE; SPIN DYNAMICS; SPONTANEOUS EMISSION;

BRAIN LESIONS; BRAIN METASTASIS; BRAIN TUMORS; DIAGNOSTIC ABILITIES; ECHO IMAGING; IMAGE INTERPRETATIONS; METASTASIS; MP-RAGE; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; TREATMENT STRATEGIES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETISM; MALE; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 56749173527     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850802477924     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Suzuki K, Yamamoto M, Hasegawa Y, Ando M, Shima K, Sako C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnoses of brain metastases of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2004;46:357-60.
2. Akeson P, Larsson EM, Kristoffersen DT, Jonsson E, Holtas S. Brain metastases-comparison of gadodiamide injection-enhanced MR imaging at standard and high dose, contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1995;36:300-6.
3. Nomoto Y, Miyamoto T, Yamaguchi Y. Brain metastasis of small cell lung carcinoma: comparison of Gd-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and enhanced computerized tomography. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1994;24:258-62.
4. Davis PC, Hudgins PA, Peterman SB, Hoffman JC Jr. Diagnosis of cerebral metastases: double-dose delayed CT vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:293-300.
5. Held P, Frund R, Seitz J, Nitz W, Haffke T, Hees H. Comparison of 2-D turbo spin echo and 3-D gradient echo sequences for the detection of the trigeminal nerve and. branches anatomy. Eur J Radiol. 2001;37:18-25.
6. Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan GD, Nitz WR. MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, Tl-weighted, gradient-echo sequence-initial experience in the brain, Radiology 1992;182:769-75.
7. Mugler JP 3rd, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med 1990;15:152-7.
8. Haase A, Matthaei D, Bartkowski R, Duhmke E, Leibfritz D. Inversion recovery snapshot FLASH MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989;13:1036-40.
9. Hawighorst H, Schad LR, Gademann G, Bliiml S, Knopp MV, Wenz F, et al. A 3D Tl-weighted gradient-echo sequence for routine use in 3D radiosurgical treatment planning of brain metastases: first clinical results. Eur Radiol 1995;5:19-25.
10. Donahue BR, Goldberg JD, Golfinos JG, Knopp EA, Comiskey J, Rush SC, et al. Importance of MR technique for stereotactic radiosurgery. Neuro Oncol 2003;5:268-74.
11. Wenz F, Hess T, Knopp MV, Weisser G, Bluml S, Schad LR, et al. 3D MPRAGE evaluation of lesions in the posterior cranial fossa. Magn Res Imag 1994;12: 553-8.
12. Shah M, Ross JS, Tkach J, Modic MT. 3D MPRAGE evaluation of the internal auditory canals. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:442-5.
13. Chakraborty DP, Winter LH. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 1990;174:873-81.
14. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723-31.
15. Chakraborty D. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization. Acad Radiol 2002;9:147-56.
16. van den Hauwe L, Parizel PM, Van Goethem JW, De Schepper AM. Clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE of the brain. Neuroradiology 1996;38 Suppl l:S14-9.
17. Li D, Haacke EM, Tarr RW, Venkatesan. R, Lin. W, Wielopolski P. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with gadopentetate dimeglumine-DTPA: comparison of Tl-weighted. spin-echo and 3D gradient-echo sequences. J Magn Reson Imag 1996;6:415-24.
18. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Horsfield MA, Rovaris M, Pereira C, Yousry TA, et al. Increased spatial resolution using a three-dimensional Tl-weighted gradient-echo MR sequence results in greater hypointense lesion volumes in multiple sclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19:235-8.
19. Shogry ME, Elster AD. Cerebrovascular enhancement in spoiled GRASS (SPGR) images: comparison with spin-echo technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16: 48-53.
20. Sze G, Johnson C, Kawamura Y, Goldberg SN, Lange R, Friedland RJ, et al. Comparison of single- and tripledose contrast material in the MR screening of brain metastases. Am. J Neuroradiol 1998;19:821-8.
21. Yuh WT, Tali ET, Nguyen. HD, Simonson TM, Mayr NA, Fisher DJ. The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:373-80.
22. Schorner W, Laniado M, Niendorf HP, Schubert C, Felix R. Time-dependent changes in image contrast in brain tumors after gadolinium-DTPA. Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:1013-20.
23. Wetzel SG, Johnson G, Tan AG, Cha S, Knopp EA, Lee VS, et al. Three-dimensional, Tl-weighted gradientecho imaging of the brain with a volumetric interpolated examination. Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:995-1002.