Effect of PIT tags on the survival and recruitment of Great Tits Parus major

Ardea

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 286-292

  Nicolaus, Marion ^a   Bouwman, Karen M ^a   Dingemanse, Niels J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fledgling success; Implantation; Parus major; Recruitment; Subcutaneous; Survival; Transponder

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FLEDGING; NESTLING; PASSERINE; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); SURVIVAL;

AVES; PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 56749154054     PISSN: 03732266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5253/078.096.0215     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Applegate R.D., Jamison B.E., Robel R.J. & Kemp K.E. 2000. Effects of passive integrated transponders on ring-necked pheasant chicks. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 103: 150-156.
2. Ballard G., Ainley D.G., Ribic C.A. & Barton K.R. 2001. Effect of instrument attachment and other factors on foraging trip duration and nesting success of Adelie Penguins. Condor 103: 481-490.
3. Becker P.H. & Wendeln H. 1997. A new application for transponders in population ecology of the common tern. Condor 99: 534-538.
4. Boisvert M.J. & Sherry D.F. 2000. A system for the automated recording of feeding behavior and body weight. Physiol. Behav. 71: 147-151.
5. Booms T.L. & McCaffery B.J. 2007. A novel use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags as nest markers. J. Field Ornithol. 78: 83-86.
6. Carver A.V., Burger L.W. & Brennan L.A. 1999. Passive integrated transponders and patagial tag markers for northern bobwhite chicks. J. Wildl. Manage. 63: 162-166.
7. Clarke J. & Kerry K. 1998. Implanted transponders in penguins: Implantation, reliability, and long-term effects. J. Field Ornithol. 69: 149-159.
8. Dittmann T. & Becker P.H. 2003. Sex, age, experience and condition as factors affecting arrival date in prospecting common tems, Sterna hirundo. Anim. Behav. 65: 981-986.
9. Freitag A., Martinoli A. & Urzelai J. 2001. Monitoring the feeding activity of nesting birds with an autonomous system: case study of the endangered Wryneck Jynx torquilla. Bird Study 48: 102-109.
10. Gauthier-Clerc M., Gendner J.P., Ribic C.A., Fraser W.R., Woehler E.J., Descamps S., Gilly C., Le Bohec C. & Le Maho Y. 2004. Long-term effects of flipper bands on penguins. Proc. R. Soc. London B 271: S423-S426.
11. Gendner J.P., Gauthier-Clerc M., Le Bohec C., Descamps S. & Le Maho Y. 2005. A new application for transponders in studying penguins. J. Field Ornithol. 76: 138-142.
12. Gonzalez-Solis J., Becker P.H. & Wendeln H. 1999. Divorce and asynchronous arrival in Common Terns, Sterna hirundo. Anim. Behav. 58: 1123-1129.
13. Griffiths R., Double M.C., Orr K. & Dawson R.J.G. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1071-1075.
14. Jamison B.E., Beyer R.S., Robel R.J. & Pontius J.S. 2000. Passive integrated transponder tags as markers for chicks. Poult. Sci. 79: 946-948.
15. Keiser J.T., Ziegenfus C.W.S. & Cristol D.A. 2005. Homing success of migrant versus nonmigrant Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis). Auk 122: 608-617.
16. Kenward R.E., Pfeffer R.H., Al-Bowardi M.A., Fox N.C., Riddle K.E., Bragin E.A., Levin A., Walls S.S. & Hodder K.H. 2001. Setting harness sizes and other marking techniques for a falcon with strong sexual dimorphism. J. Field Ornithol. 72: 244-257.
17. Low M., Eason D. & McInnes K. 2005. Evaluation of passive integrated transponders for identification of Kakapo, Strigops habroptilus. Emu 105: 33-38.
18. Ottosson U., Backman J. & Smith H.G. 2001. Nest-attenders in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) during nestling rearing: A possible case of prospective resource exploration. Auk 118: 1069-1072.
19. Rasbash J., Steele F., Browne W. & Presser B. 2004. A user's guide to MlWin. version 2.02 edition. Institute of Education, London.
20. Weimerskirch H., Chastel O., Cherel Y., Henden J.A. & Tveraa T. 2001. Nest attendance and foraging movements of northern fulmars rearing chicks at Bjørnøya Barents Sea. Polar Biol. 24: 83-88.
21. White G.C. & Burnham K.P. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120-138.