South Dakota's abortion script - Threatening the physician-patient relationship

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 359, Issue 21, 2008, Pages 2189-2191

  Lazzarini, Zita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HELP SEEKING BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL CARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 56749151480     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0806742     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. S. D. Codified § 34-23A-10.1 (2006).
2. Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Rounds, 530 F.3d 724 (2008).
3. Gonzales v Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007).
4. Post R. Informed consent to abortion: a First Amendment analysis of compelled physician speech. Univ Ill Law Rev 2007;3:939.
5. 45 C.F.R. pt. 88 (RIN 0991-AB48), Fed. Reg. 73(166): 50274. August 26, 2008.