Supporting the patient's role in guideline compliance: A controlled study

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 737-744

  Rosenberg, Stephen N ^a   Shnaiden, Tatiana L ^b   Wegh, Arnold A ^a   Juster, Iver A ^b  

^a ActiveHealth Management   (United States)

^b NY City Dept of Hlth/Mental Hyg   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG INTERACTION; DRUG MONITORING; EMPLOYER; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MONITORING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; VACCINATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 56749146319     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2000.
2. Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optional health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27(2):94-102.
3. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635-2645.
4. Stuart B. How Disease Burden Influences Medication Patterns for Medicare Beneficiaries: Implications for Policy. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund; 2008.
5. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223-1238.
6. McCowan C, Neville RG, Ricketts IW, Warner FC, Hoskins G, Thomas GE. Lessons from a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate computer decision support software to improve the management of asthma. Med Inform. 2001;26(3);191-201.
7. Lobach DF, Hammond E. Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. Am J Med. 1997;102(1):89-98.
8. Smith DH, Kramer JM, Perrin N, et al. A randomized trial of direct-to-patient communication to enhance adherence to β-blocker therapy following myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):477-483.
9. Juster I. Technology-driven interactive care management identifies and resolves more clinical issues than a claims-based alerting system. Dis Manag. 2005;8(3):188-197.
10. Kaplan S, Greenfield S. The patient's role in reducing disparities. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(3):222-223.
11. Glasziou P, Haynes B. The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid Based Nurs. 2005;8(2):36-38.
12. Javitt JC, Steinberg G, Locke T, et al. Using a claims data-based sentinel system to improve compliance with clinical guidelines: results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11(2):93-102.
13. Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3(6):399-409.
14. Bluman B, Jarvis-Selinger S, Hotz S. Guidelines implementation: transforming physician/patient interaction through stages of change. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27(3):188-189.