Audio-visual policy: The stumbling block of trade liberalisation?

The WTO and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 165-214

  Graber, Christoph Beat ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56749135027     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511674471.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. C. B. Graber, ‘Exception culturelle.Une revendication dépassée’, Courrier de la Plan`ete 55 (2000): 46
2. C. B. Graber, ‘WTO: A Threat to European Films?’, in Enrique Banus, ed., Proceedings of the V Conference ‘European Culture’, 28-31. October 1998 (Elcano:University ofNavarra at Pamplona, Aranzadi Editorial, 2000), pp. 865
3. Communication from Japan, ‘The Negotiations on Trade in Services’, S/CSS/W/42, 22 December 2000, paras. 36-7.
4. Communication from Canada, ‘Initial Canadian Negotiating Proposals’, S/CSS/W/46, 14 March 2001, and S/CSS/W/46/Corr.1, 23 March 2001.
5. I. Bernier and H. Ruiz Fabri, ‘Evaluation de la faisabilit é juridique d’un instrument international sur la diversité culturelle’, available at www.mcc.gouv.ca/international/diversite-culturelle/publications.htm (5 May 2002)
6. B. deWitte, ‘Trade inCulture: International Legal Regimes and EUConstitutionalValues’, in G. de Burca and J. Scott, eds., The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2001), pp. 237-247.
7. Multilateral Trade Negotiations, the Uruguay Round Group of Negotiations on Services, Services Sectoral Classification List, Note by the Secretariat, MTN.GNS/W/120, 10 July 1991.
8. World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services, Audiovisual Services, Background Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/40, 15 June 1998, p. 1.
9. Body Report, ‘Canada - Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals’, WT/DS31/AB/R, 30 June 1997, para. 4
10. WTO Appellate Body Report, ‘European Communities - Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas’, WT/DS27/AB/R, 9 September 1997, para. IV.C.1.
11. M. Zitzmann, ‘Asterix contra Sauron: Die französische Filmwirtschaft und ihre Erfolgsrezepte’, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 7 January 2002.
12. D. E. Biederman et al., Law and Business of the Entertainment Industries (4th edn, Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001), p. 639
13. C. Vachon, Shooting to Kill: How an Independent Producer Blasts Through the Barriers to MakeMovies thatMatter (New York: Avon, 1998), pp. 297
14. G. Ress and J. Ukrow, ‘Article 151 EGV’, in E. Grabitz and M. Hilf, eds., Das Recht der Europäischen Union: Kommentar, 16th Supplement, Munich: C. H. Beck, 2000, page 16.
15. T. Cottier, ‘Die völkerrechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen der Filmförderung in der neuen Welthandelsorganisation WTO-GATT’, Zeitschrift für Urheber-und Medienrecht (1994): 749-751
16. B. J. Drijber, ‘The Revised Television Without Frontiers Directive: Is It Fit for the Next Century?’, Common Market Law Review 36(1999)
17. Blue Sky V. Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) HCA 28, 28 April 1998, S41/1997, available at www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases 10 October 2001
18. A. M. Carlson, ‘The Country Music Television Dispute: An Illustration of the Tensions Between Canadian Cultural Protectionism and American Entertainment Exports’, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 6 (1997): 585
19. A. E. Lehmann, ‘The Canadian Cultural Exemption Clause and the Fight to Maintain an Identity’, 23 (1997): Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 187-207
20. P. Straumann, ‘Renaissance des brasilianischen Films? Positive Folgen des Audiovisions-Gesetzes’, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 20 April 2000.
21. I. Bernier, ‘Cultural Goods and Services in InternationalTrade Law’, in DennisBrowne, ed., The Culture/Trade Quandary: Canada’s Policy Options (Ottawa: Centre for Trade Policy and Law, 1998), p. 118
22. M. Footer and C. B. Graber, ‘Trade Liberalization and Cultural Policy’, Journal of International Economic Law 3 (2000): 115-127
23. T. P. Stewart, ed., The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1986-1994), vol. 4, The End Game (Part I) (The Hague, London and Boston: Kluwer, 1999), p. 512
24. T. Gibbons, ‘Aspiring to Pluralism: The Constraints of Public Broadcasting Values on the De-Regulation of British Media Ownership’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 16 (1998): 475-500
25. G. Doyle, ‘Regulation of Media Ownership and Pluralism in Europe: Can the European Union Take Us Forward?’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 16 (1998): 451-73
26. A. James and A. Dawtrey, ‘Oui are the World’, Variety, 19 June 2000, at 1, 85
27. H. Waldhauser, Die Fernsehrechte des Sportveranstalters (Berlin: Duncker &Humblot, 1999), pp. 297.
28. O. Sidler, Exklusivberichterstattung über Sportveranstaltungen im Rundfunk (Berne: Stämpfli, 1995).
29. A. Harcourt, ‘The European Commission and Regulation of theMedia Industry’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 16 (1998): 425-49
30. M. Stock, ‘Konzentrationskontrolle in Deutschland nach der Neufassung des Rundfunkstaatsvertrags (1996)’, in M. Stock, H. Röper and B. Holznagel, eds., Medienmarkt und Meinungsmacht: Zur Neuregelung der Konzentrationskontrolle in Deutschland und Grossbritannien (Berlin: Springer, 1997), pp. 1-70
31. F. Hoffet and T. Hoehn, ‘Zusammenschlusskontrolle im Medienbereich, Anmerkungen zur bisherigen Praxis der Schweizerischen Wettbewerbskommission’, (1999) Sic. 232
32. B. Holznagel and A. Grünwald, ‘Britisches Medienkonzentrationsrecht im Wandel’, in Stock, Röper and Holznagel, ‘Zusammerschlasskontrolle’, pp. 109-59.
33. W. Hoffmann-Riem, Regulating Media: The Licensing and Supervision of Broadcasting in Six Countries (New York and London: Guilford Press, 1996), pp. 49-76, 211ff and 295.
34. M. Dumermuth, ‘Rundfunkrecht’, in H. Koller et al., eds., Schweizerisches Bundesverwaltungsrecht, Informations-und Kommunikationsrecht (Basel and Frankfurt am Main: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1996), vol. 4, para. 395.
35. C. Hyun-Kyung Kim, ‘Building the Korean Film Industry’s Competitiveness: Abolish The Screen Quota and Subsidise the Film Industry’, Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 9 (2000): 353-356.
36. Hyun-Kyung Kim, ‘Building the Korean Film Industry’s Competitiveness’, p. 362.
37. T. Cottier and C. Germann, ‘TheWTOand EU Distributive Policy: TheCase of Regional Promotion and Assistance’, in G. de Burca and J. Scott, eds., The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2001), p. 185-198
38. M. König, ‘Was bringt eine neue GATS-Runde für die audiovisuellenMedien?’, (2002) Zeitschrift für Urheber-und Medienrecht(2002): 271-274.
39. W. Drake and K. Nicoläıdis, ‘Global Electronic Commerce andGATS: TheMillenniumRound and Beyond’, in P. Sauvé andR. Stern, eds., GATS 2000 New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000), pp. 399-407
40. C. E. Baker, ‘An Economic Critique of Free Trade in Media Products’, North Carolina Law Review 78 (2000): 1357-1361
41. Jürgen Habermas, Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 91-167.