Stereotactic minimally invasive tubular retractor system for deep brain lesions

Neurosurgery

Volumn 63, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2008, Pages

  Greenfield, Jeffrey P ^a   Cobb, William S ^a   Tsouris, A John ^b   Schwartz, Theodore H ^a,b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain tumor; Minimal access; Minimally invasive; Retractor; Stereotactic; Tubular

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN MALFORMATION; BRAIN METASTASIS; CAVERNOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORTICAL SENSORY APHASIA; CRANIOTOMY; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MENINGIOMA; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TUBULAR RETRACTOR SYSTEM; NEURONAVIGATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOSURGERY; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETRACTOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 56749125055     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000334741.61745.72     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albin MS, Bunegin L, Bennett MH, Dujovney M, Jannetta PJ: Physiopathological responses to graded brain retractor pressure under induced hypotension. Proc Am Assoc Neurol Surg 23, 1976.
2. Beems T, van Dongen RT: Use of a tubular retractor system as a minimally invasive technique for epidural plate electrode placement under local anesthesia for spinal cord stimulation: Technical note. Neurosurgery 58:ONS-E177, 2006.
3. Bennett MH, Albin MS, Bunegin L, Dujovny M, Hellstrom H, Jannetta PJ: Evoked potential changes during brain retraction in dogs. Stroke 8:487-492, 1977.
4. Cappabianca P, Frank G, Pasquini E, de Diviitis E, Calbucci F: Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches to the suprasellar region, planum sphenoidale and clivus, in de Diviitis E, Cappabianca P (eds): Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery. New York, Springer, 2003, pp 176-188.
5. Donaghy RM, Numoto M, Wallman LJ, Flanagan ME: Pressure measurement beneath retractors for protection of delicate tissues. Am J Surg 1323:429-431, 1972.
6. Frank EH, Hsu FP: An endoscopic dural retractor for spinal stenosis surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:136-138, 2002.
7. Greenberg IM: Self-retaining retractor and handrest for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 8:205-208, 1981.
8. Harris AE, Hadjipanayis CG, Lunsford LD, Lunsford AK, Kassam AB: Microsurgical removal of intraventricular lesions using endoscopic visualization and stereotactic guidance. Neurosurgery 56:125-132, 2005.
9. Kassam A, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R: Expanded endonasal approach: Fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 19:E6, 2005.
10. Kelly PJ: Future perspectives in stereotactic neurosurgery: Stereotactic microsurgical removal of deep brain tumors. J Neurosurg Sci 33:149-154, 1989.
11. Kelly PJ, Goerss SJ, Kall BA: The stereotaxic retractor in computer-assisted stereotactic microsurgery: Technical note. J Neurosurg 69:301-306, 1988.
12. Kelly PJ, Kall BA, Goerss SJ: Computer-interactive stereotactic resection of deep-seated and centrally located intraaxial brain lesions. Appl Neurophysiol 50:107-113, 1987.
13. Laufer I, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Endonasal endoscopic extended transsphenoidal, transplanum approach for suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg 106:400-406, 2007.
14. Moshel YA, Link MJ, Kelly PJ: Stereotactic volumetric resection of thalamic pilocytic astrocytoma. Neurosurgery 61:66-75, 2007.
15. Rosenørn J, Diemer NH: Reduction of regional cerebral blood flow during brain retraction pressure in the rat. J Neurosurg 56:826-829, 1982.
16. Rosenørn J, Diemer N: The risk of cerebral damage during graded brain retractor pressure in the rat. J Neurosurg 63:608-611, 1985.
17. Schick U, Döhnert J: Technique of microendoscopy in medial lumbar disc herniation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:139-141, 2002.
18. Schwartz TH, Anand VK: The endoscopic, transethmoidal, transcribriform approach to the anterior cranial fossa, in Anand VK, Schwartz TH (eds): Practical Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. San Diego, Plural Publishing, 2007, pp 135-154.
19. Schwartz TH, Anand VK: The endoscopic, transsphenoidal transplanum, transtuberculum approach to the suprasellar cistern, in Anand VK, Schwartz TH (eds): Practical Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. San Diego, Plural Publishing, 2007, pp 105-122.
20. Schwartz TH, Bruce JN: Extended frontal approach with bilateral orbitofrontoethmoidal osteotomies for removal of a giant extracranial schwannoma in the nasopharynx, sphenoid sinus, and parapharyngeal space. Surg Neurol 55:270-274, 2001.
21. Sekhar LN, Nanda A, Sen CN, Snyderman CN, Janecka IP: The extended frontal approach to tumors of the anterior, middle and posterior skull base. J Neurosurg 76:198-206, 1992.
22. Sen CN, Sekhar LN: An extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery 27:197-204, 1990.
23. Shelden CH, McCann G, Jacques S, Lutes HR, Frazier RE, Katz R, Kuki R: Development of a computerized microstereotaxic method for localization and removal of minute CNS lesions under direct 3-D vision: Technical report. J Neurosurg 52:21-27, 1980.
24. Tredway TL, Santiago P, Hrubes MR, Song JK, Christie SD, Fessier RG: Minimally invasive resection of intradural-extramedullary spinal neoplasms. Neurosurgery 58 [Suppl 1]:ONS52-ONS58, 2006.
25. Zhong J, Dujovney M, Perlin AR, Perez-Arjona E, Park HK, Diaz FG: Brain retraction injury. Neurol Res 25:831-838, 2003.