Does patient health and hysterectomy status influence cervical cancer screening in older women?

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1822-1828

  Meissner, Helen I ^a   Tiro, Jasmin A ^b   Haggstrom, David ^c,d   Lu Yao, Grace ^e   Breen, Nancy ^f  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical screening; Comorbidity; Health status; Hysterectomy; Older age

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DEPENDENT VARIABLE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEALTH; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; INTERVIEW; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PUBLIC HEALTH; RATING SCALE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 56749107245     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0775-x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. LC Walter K Lindquist KE Covinsky 2004 Relationship between health status and use of screening mammography and Papanicolaou smears among women older than 70 years of age Ann Intern Med 140 681 688
2. LC Walter KE Covinsky 2001 Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making J Am Med Assoc 285 2750 2756
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2006. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspstopics. htm#Ctopics. Accessed August 18, 2008.
4. RA Smith V Cokkinides HJ Eyre 2006 American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006 CA-Cancer J Clin 56 11 25
5. SM Yasmeen PSMM Romano MM Pettinger 2006 Incidence of cervical cytological abnormalities with aging in the women's health initiative: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 108 410 419
6. M Hewitt SS Devesa N Breen 2004 Cervical cancer screening among U.S. women: analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Prev Med 39 270 278
7. J Swan N Breen RJ Coates BK Rimer NC Lee 2003 Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer 97 1528 1540
8. CI Kiefe E Funkhouser MN Fouad DS May 1998 Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening J Gen Intern Med 13 357 365
9. CR Kagay C Quale R Smith-Bindman 2006 Screening mammography in the American elderly Am J Prev Med 31 142 149
10. JS Mandelblatt K Gold AS O'Malley 1999 Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care Prev Med 28 418 425
11. BE Sirovich HG Welch 2004 The frequency of Pap smear screening in the United States J Gen Intern Med 19 243 250
12. National Research Council. Toward a national health care survey. A data system for 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
13. Botman SL, Moore TF, Moriarity CL, Parsons VL. Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004. Vital Health Statistics. 2000;2.
14. RM Andersen 1995 Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36 1 10
15. KA Phillips KR Morrison R Andersen LA Aday 1998 Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the behavioral model of utilization Health Serv Res 33 571 596
16. SS Coughlin ES Breslau T Thompson VB Benard 2005 Physician recommendation for papanicolaou testing among US women, 2000 Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14 1143 1148
17. ME Charlson P Pompei KL Ales CR MacKenzie 1987 A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis 40 373 383
18. W D'Hoore C Sicotte C Tilquin 1993 Risk adjustment in outcome assessment: the Charlson comorbidity index Methods of Information in Medicine 32 382 387
19. V Sundararajan T Henderson C Perry A Muggivan H Quan WA Ghali 2004 New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality J Clin Epidemiol 57 1288 1294
20. O Birim APWM Maat AP Kappetein JP van Meerbeeck RAM Damhuis AJJC Bogers 2003 Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with operated primary non-small cell lung cancer Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 23 30 34
21. HM Quan GAR Parsons WAM Ghali 2002 Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD-9-CCM administrative data Med Care 40 675 685
22. BM Singh MM Bhaya JM Stern 1997 Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with head and neck cancer: a multi-institutional study Laryngoscope 107 1469 1475
23. SM Chaudhry LM Jin DM Meltzer 2005 Use of a self-report-generated Charlson comorbidity index for predicting mortality Med Care 43 607 615
24. W Rakowski H Meissner SW Vernon N Breen B Rimer MA Clark 2006 Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003) Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15 2093 2101
25. MA Clark W Rakowski B Ehrich 2000 Breast and cervical cancer screening: associations with personal, spouse's and combined smoking status Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 9 513 516
26. W Rakowski MA Clark B Ehrich 1999 Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1900-1994 National Health Interview Surveys Prev Med 29 487 495
27. SUDAAN user's manual, release 9.0.1. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 2005.
28. Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of Health Surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1999.
29. Vernon SW, Tiro JA, Meissner HI. Behavioral research in cancer screening. In: Miller S, Bowen DJ, Croyle RT, Rowland JH, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Science and Cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2008.
30. RA Hiatt C Klabunde N Breen J Swan R Ballard-Barbash 2002 Cancer screening practices from national health interview surveys: past, present, and future J Natl Cancer Inst 94 1837 1846
31. J Mandelblatt W Lawrence B Yi J King 2004 The balance of harms, benefits, and costs of screening for cervical cancer in older women: the case for continued screening Arch Intern Med 164 245 247
32. C Lewis C Kistler H Amick 2006 Older adults' attitudes about continuing cancer screening later in life: a pilot study interviewing residents of two continuing care communities BMC Geriatrics 6 10
33. BE Sirovich S Woloshin LM Schwartz 2005 Screening for cervical cancer: will women accept less? Am J Med 118 151 158
34. MT Heflin KI Pollak MN Kuchibhatla LG Branch EZ Oddone 2006 The impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61 844 850
35. BE Sirovich HG Welch 2004 Cervical cancer screening among women without a cervix J Am Med Assoc 291 2990 2993
36. LI Iezzoni EP McCarthy RB Davis L Harris-David B O'Day 2001 Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities Am J Med Qual 16 135 144
37. G Lu-Yao TA Stukel SL Yao 2003 Prostate-specific antigen screening in elderly men JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 95 1792 1797
38. CN Klabunde AL Potosky JM Legler JL Warren 2000 Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data J Clin Epidemiol 53 1258 12567
39. SW Vernon PA Briss JA Tiro RB Warnecke 2004 Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research Cancer 101 1131 1145
40. JG Zapka SC Lemon 2004 Interventions for patients, providers and health care organizations Cancer 101 1165 1187
41. EH Wagner BT Austin M Von Korff 1996 Organizing care for patients with chronic illness Milbank Q 74 511 544
42. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning. An educational and environmental approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1991.
43. ES Fisher DE Wennberg TA Stukel DJ Gottlieb FL Lucas EL Pinder 2003 The implications of regional variations in medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care Ann Intern Med 138 273 287
44. ES Fisher DE Wennberg TA Stukel DJ Gottlieb FL Lucas Et Pinder 2003 The implications of regional variations in medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care Ann Intern Med 138 288 298
45. Avorn, JL, Barrett, JF., Davey, PG, McEwen, SA, O'Brien, TF, Levy, SB. Antibiotic resistance: synthesis of recommendations by expert policy groups. World Health Organization; 2001.
46. S Melanson T Szymanski S Rogers 2007 Utilization of arterial blood gas measurements in a large tertiary care hospital Am J Clin Pathol 127 604 609
47. DH Solomon H Hashimoto L Daltroy MH Liang 1998 Techniques to improve physicians' use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework JAMA J Am Med Assoc 280 2020 2027
48. RJ Volk ST Hawley S Kneuper 2007 Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review Am J Prev Med 33 428 434