What design science is not

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 441-443

  Baskerville, Richard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56749102190     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2008.45     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. GOLDKUHL G (2004) Design theories in information systems - a need for multi-grounding. JITTA: Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 59-72.
2. GRECOR S and JONES D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312-335.
3. IIVARI J (2007) A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 39-63.
4. JÄRVINEN P (2007) Action research is similar to design science. Quality and Quantity 41(1), 37-54.
5. MARCH ST and SMITH GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251-266.
6. MARKUS ML, MAICHRZAK A and GASSER L (2002) A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly 26(3), 179-212.
7. MUMFORD E and WEIR M (1979) Computer Systems Work Design: The Ethics Method. Associated Business Press, London.
8. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and IACONO CS (2001) Research commentary: desperately eeking "IT" in it research - a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2), 121-134.
9. SIMON HA (1996) The science of design: creating the artificial. In The Sciences of the Artificial pp 111-138, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. SUTTON Rl and Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3), 371-384.
11. WALLS JG, WIDMEYER GR and EL SAWY OA (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36-59.