Dynamics in behavioral response to fuel-cell vehicle fleet and hydrogen fueling infrastructure an exploratory study

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2058, 2008, Pages 155-162

  Shaheen, Susan A ^a,b   Martin, Elliot ^b   Lipman, Timothy E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; FELT; FLEET OPERATIONS; FUEL CELLS; FUELING; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; HYDROGEN; VEHICLES;

ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS; AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; FUEL CELL VEHICLES; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HYDROGEN FUEL CELL VEHICLES; HYDROGEN FUELING INFRASTRUCTURES; VEHICLE FLEETS;

ENERGY SECURITY;

EID: 56749092296     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2058-19     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baumert, K. A., T. Herzog, and J. Pershing. Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy. World Resources Institute, 2005.
2. 2 Reductions. ETCP Paper 02/2003. IEA, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2003.
3. Altmann, M., and C. Graesal. The Acceptance of Hydrogen Technologies. Report for HyWeb. Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH, Germany. www.hydrogen.org/accepth2/execsumm.html. Accessed Aug. 1, 2007.
4. O'Garra, T. Comparative Analysis of the Impact of the Hydrogen Bus Trials on Public Awareness, Attitudes and Preferences: A Comparative Study of Four Cities. Report for ACCEPTH2 Project. European Commission Fifth Framework Programme, 2005.
5. O'Garra, T., S. Mourato, and P. Pearson. Analysing Awareness and Acceptability of Hydrogen Vehicles: A London Case Study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 30, 2005, pp. 649-659.
6. Mourato, S., B. Saynor, and D. Hart. Greening London's Black Cabs: A Study of Driver Preferences for Fuel Cell Taxis. Energy Policy, Vol. 32, 2004, pp. 685-695.
7. Schulte, I., D. Hart, and R. van der Vorst. Issues Affecting the Acceptance of Hydrogen Fuel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 29, 2004, pp. 677-685.
8. Dinse, G. Akzeptanz con wasserstqffbetriebenen Fahrzeugen: Eine Stitdie über die Verwendung eines neuen and ungewohnten Kraftsoffs. Institut fur Mobilitätsforchung, 2000.
9. Gould, J., and T. Golob. Clean Air Forever? A Longitudinal Analysis of Opinions about Air Pollution and Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research, Vol. 3D, No. 3, 1998, pp. 157-169.
10. Kurani, K., T. Turrentine, and D. Sperling. Demand for Electric Vehicles in Hybrid Households: An Exploratory Analysis. Transport Policy, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1994, pp. 244-256.
11. Turrentine, T., and K. Kurani. The Household Market for Electric Vehicles. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-95-5. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1995.
12. Kurani, K., T. Turrentine, and D. Sperling. Testing Electric Vehicle Demand in 'Hybrid Households' Using a Reflexive Survey. Transportation Research, Vol. ID, No. 2, 1996, pp. 131-150.
13. Golob, T., and J. Gould. Projecting Use of Electric Vehicles from Household Vehicle Trials. Transportation Research, Vol. 32B, No. 7, 1998, pp. 44154.
14. Turrentine, T., and K. Kurani. Adapting Interactive Stated Response Techniques to a Self-Completion Survey. Transportation, Vol. 25, 1998, pp. 207-222.
15. de Haan, P., A. Peters, and M. Mueller. Comparison of Buyers of Hybrid and Conventional Internal Combustion Engine Automobiles: Characteristics, Preferences, and Previously Owned Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1983, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 106-113.
16. 2005 American Community Survey: Selected Social Characteristics in the United States: 2005, California. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2005.