A labeling approach to the computation of credulous acceptance in argumentation

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 623-628

  Verheij, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMISSIBLE SET; ATTACK GRAPH; BREADTH-FIRST ALGORITHMS; COMBINATORICS; CREDULOUS ACCEPTANCE; FOCUS OF ATTENTION; LABELINGS; PRODUCTIVE TOOLS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 56649124450     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Caminada, M. (2006). On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation. Technical report UU-CS-2006-023.
2. Cayrol, C., Doutre, S., & Mengin, J. (2003). On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), pp 377-403.
3. Chesñevar, C. I., & Simari, G. R. (2006). An Abstract Model for Computing Warrant in Skeptical Argumentation Frameworks, 11th Intl. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2006).
4. Doutre, S., & Mengin, J. (2001). Preferred Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks: Query Answering and Computation. In IJCAR 2001, LNAI 2083, pp 272-288. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Pubitemid 33291429)
5. Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, pp 321-357.
6. Dung, P. M., Kowalski, R. A., & Toni, F. (2006). Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 170, pp 114-159. (Pubitemid 43006088)
7. Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2002). Research note. Coherence in finite argument systems. Artificial Intelligence 141, pp 187-203.
8. Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency. Artificial Intelligence 149, pp 221-250.
9. Verheij, B. (1996). Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. In J.-J. C. Meyer & L. C. van der Gaag (eds.), NAIC'96. Proceedings of the Eighth Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp 357-368). Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
10. Verheij, B. (2003a). Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 150(1-2), pp 291-324.
11. Verheij, B. (2003b). DefLog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (3), pp 319-346.