On the origin of the Galápagos hawk: An examination of phenotypic differentiation and mitochondrial paraphyly

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 779-789

  Hull, Joshua M ^a   Savage, Wesley K ^a   Bollmer, Jennifer L ^b   Kimball, Rebecca T ^c   Parker, Patricia G ^b   Whiteman, Noah K ^b,d   Ernest, Holly B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c University of Florida ^*  (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Archipelago; Buteo galapagoensis; Buteo swainsoni; Island; Morphology; Niche expansion

Indexed keywords

ARCHIPELAGO; CLADISTICS; COLONIZATION; DIET; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; ISLAND; MITOCHONDRION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYLOGENY; RANGE EXPANSION; RAPTOR; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

BUTEO; BUTEO GALAPAGOENSIS; BUTEO JAMAICENSIS; BUTEO SWAINSONI;

EID: 56649123113     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01082.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16 : 37 48.
2. Barton NH. 1998. Natural selection and random genetic drift as causes of evolution on islands. In : Brush H, Clark GA Jr., eds. Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
3. Bollmer JL, Kimball RT, Whiteman NK, Sarasola JH, Parker PG. 2006. Phylogeography of the Galápagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis): a recent arrival to the Galápagos Islands. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39 : 237 247.
4. Bollmer JL, Sanchez T, Cannon MD, Sanchez D, Cannon B, Bednarz JC, de Vries T, Struve MS, Parker PG. 2003. Variation in morphology and mating system among island populations of Galápagos hawks. The Condor 105 : 428 438.
5. Bollmer JL, Whiteman NK, Cannon MD, Bednarz JC, de Vries T, Parker PG. 2005. Population genetics of the Galápagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis): genetic monomorphism within isolated populations. The Auk 122 : 1210 1224.
6. Bromham L, Woolfit M, Lee MSY, Rambaut A. 2002. Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies. Evolution 56 : 1921 1930.
7. Bromham LD, Hendy MD. 2000. Can fast early rates reconcile molecular dates with the Cambrian explosion? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 267 : 1041 1047.
8. Bunce M, Szulkin M, Lerner HRL, Barnes I, Shapiro B, Cooper A, Holdaway RN. 2005. Ancient DNA provides new insights into the evolutionary history of New Zealand's extinct giant eagle. PLoS Biology 3 : 44 46.
9. Clark WS, Witt CC. 2006. First known specimen of a hybrid Buteo: Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni) x Rough-legged Hawk (B. lagopus) from Louisiana. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 118 : 42 52.
10. Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Moritz C, Estoup A, Kikkawa J, Owens IPF. 2002. Microevolution in island forms: the roles of drift and directional selection in morphological divergence of a passerine bird. Evolution 56 : 2090 2099.
11. Clegg SM, Owens IPF. 2002. The 'island rule' in birds: medium body size and its ecological explanation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 269 : 1359 1365.
12. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a com puter program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9 : 1657 1660.
13. England AS, Bechard MJ, Houston CS. 1997. Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni). In : Poole A, Gill F, eds. The birds of North America, No. 265. Philadelphia, PA : The Academy of Natural Sciences Washington, DC : The American Ornithologists' Union.
14. Ferguson-Lees J, Christie DA. 2001. Raptors of the world. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin Company.
15. Foster JB. 1964. The evolution of mammals on islands. Nature 202 : 234 235.
16. Frey JK. 1993. Modes of peripheral isolate formation and speciation. Systematic Biology 42 : 373 381.
17. Fu Y. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking, and background selection. Genetics 147 : 915 925.
18. Fu Y, Li WH. 1993. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133 : 693 709.
19. Funk DJ, Omland KE. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34 : 397 423.
20. Golden Gate Raptor Observatory. 1998. Golden gate raptor observatory Bander's manual, 3rd edn. San Francisco, CA : Golden Gate Raptor Observatory.
21. Gelman A, Rubin D. 1992. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science 7 : 457 511.
22. Grant PR. 1998. Patterns on islands and microevolution. In : Grant PR, ed. Evolution on islands. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
23. Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K. 2000. The allopatric phase of speciation: the sharp-beaked ground finch (Geospiza difficilis) on the Galápagos islands. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69 : 287 317.
24. Harrison RG. 1991. Molecular changes at speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22 : 281 308.
25. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17 : 754 755.
26. Hull JM, Anderson R, Bradbury M, Estep JA, Ernest HB. 2008. Population structure and genetic diversity in Swainson's Hawks (Buteo swainsoni): implications for conservation. Conservation Genetics 9 : 305 316.
27. Hull JM, Savage WK, Smith JP, Murphy N, Cullen L, Hutchins AC, Ernest HB. 2007. Hybridization among Buteos: Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsoni) x red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119 : 579 584.
28. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 2000. International code of zoological nomenclature, 4th edn. London : The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.
29. Kerlinger P. 1989. Flight strategies of migrating hawks. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
30. Kimball RT, Braun EL, Zwartjes PW, Crowe TM, Ligon JD. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11 : 38 54.
31. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
32. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 2004. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5 : 150 163.
33. Lack D. 1971. Ecological isolation in birds. Oxford : Blackwell Scientific.
34. Leaché AD, Reeder TW. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology 51 : 44 68.
35. Lomolino MV. 1985. Body size of mammals on islands: the island rule re-examined. The American Naturalist, 125 : 310 316.
36. Lynch M. 1990. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. The American Naturalist 136 : 727 741.
37. Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2005. MACCLADE, Version 4.08. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates.
38. Nylander JAA. 2004. MRMODELTEST, version 2.2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala : Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
39. Omland KE. 1997. Correlated rates of molecular and morphological evolution. Evolution 51 : 1381 1393.
40. Omland KE, Lanyon SM, Fritz SJ. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the New World orioles (Icterus): the importance of dense taxon sampling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12 : 224 239.
41. Pitzer SE, Hull JM, Ernest HB, Hull AC. 2008. Sex determination of three raptor species using morphology and molecular techniques. Journal of Field Ornithology 79 : 71 79.
42. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 : 817 818.
43. Preston CR, Beane RD. 1993. Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). In : Poole A, Gill F, eds. The birds of North America, No. 52. Washington, DC : The Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, PA : The America Ornithologists' Union.
44. de Queiroz K. 2005. Different species problems and their resolution. Bioessays 27 : 1263 1269.
45. Rasner CA, Yeh P, Eggert S, Hunt KE, Woodruff DS, Price TD. 2004. Genetic and morphological evolution following a founder event in the dark-eyed junco, Junco hyemalis thurberi. Molecular Ecology 13 : 671 681.
46. Rice WR. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43 : 223 225.
47. Riesing MJ, Kruckenhauser L, Gamauf A, Haring E. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Buteo (Aves: Accipitridae) based on mitochondrial marker sequence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27 : 328 342.
48. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MRBAYES version 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 : 1572 1574.
49. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messegyer X, Rozas R. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19 : 2496 2497.
50. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor, NY : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
51. Sarasola JH, Negro JJ. 2004. Gender determination in the Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni) using molecular procedures and discriminant function analysis. Journal of Raptor Research 38 : 357 361.
52. Scott SN, Clegg SM, Blomberg SP, Kikkawa J, Owens IPF. 2003. Morphological shifts in island-dwelling birds: the roles of generalist foraging and niche expansion. Evolution 57 : 2147 2156.
53. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihood with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16 : 1114 1116.
54. Snyder NFR, Wiley JW. 1976. Sexual size dimorphism in hawks and owls of North America. Ornithological monographs, No. 20. [Battle Creek, Mich.] : Washington, DC : American Ornithologists' Union.
55. Sorenson MD, Quinn TW. 1998. Numts: A challenge for avian systematic and population biology. Auk 115 : 214 221.
56. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates.
57. Van Valen L. 1973. Body size and numbers of plants and animals. Evolution 27 : 27 35.
58. de Vries T. 1973. The Galápagos Hawk, an ecogeographical study with special reference to its systematic position. DPhil Thesis, Vrije University.
59. de Vries T. 1975. The breeding biology of the Galapagos Hawk, Buteo galapagoensis. Le Gerfaut 65 : 29 57.
60. de Vries T. 1976. Prey selection and hunting methods of the Galapagos Hawk, Buteo galapagoensis. Le Gerfaut 66 : 3 43.
61. Whiteman NK, Kimball RT, Parker PG. 2007. Co-phylogeography and comparative population genetics of the Galápagos Hawk and three ectoparasite species: ecology shapes population histories within a parasite community. Molecular Ecology 16 : 4759 4773.
62. Whiteman NK, Matson KD, Bollmer JL, Parker PG. 2006. Disease ecology in the Galápagos Hawk (Buteo galapagoensis): host genetic diversity, parasites, and natural antibodies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 273 : 797 804.
63. Whittaker RJ. 1998. Island biogeography: ecology, evolution and conservation. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
64. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16 : 97 159.
65. Zink RM, Rising JD, Mockford S, Horn AG, Wright JM, Leonard M, Westberg MC. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA variation, species limits, and rapid evolution of plumage coloration and size in the savannah sparrow. The Condor 107 : 21 28.
66. Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. DPhil Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.