From model driven engineering to verification driven engineering

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5287 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 381-393

  Kordon, Fabrice ^a   Hugues, Jérôme ^b   Renault, Xavier ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b INSTITUT TELECOM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ADVANCED MODELS; APPLICATION DOMAINS; CODE GENERATIONS; COMPLEX TASKS; DO-MAINS; ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGES; FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; MODEL DRIVEN ENGINEERINGS; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; TO SWITCHES;

MODELS; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

ADVANCED MODELING; CODE GENERATION; COMPLEX TASK; COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEM; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; NON FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES;

EID: 56649115731     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87785-1_34     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. ISO/IEC 13568. Z formal specification notation - syntax, type system and semantics (2002)
2. SEI AADL. Osate: An extensible source aadl tool environment. Technical report, SEI (2004)
3. Abrial, J.-R.: The B book - Assigning Programs to meanings. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1996)
4. Alur, R., Holzmann, G., Peled, D.: An analyser for mesage sequence charts. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) TACAS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1055, pp. 35-48. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
5. Atelier, B.: Atelier B, the industrial tool to efficiently deploy the B Method (2008), http://www.atelierb.eu/index-en.html
6. Behm. P., Benoit, P., Faivre, A., Meynadier. J.M.: Météor: A successful application of b in a large project. In: Wing, J.M., Woodcock, J.C.P., Davies, J. (eds.) FM 1999. LNCS, vol. 1708, pp. 369-387. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
7. Bernardi, S., Donatelli, S., Merseguer, J.: From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable petrinet models. In: Workshop on Software and Performance, pp. 35-45 (2002)
8. Berthomieu. B., Vernadat, R.: The TINA home page (2008), http://www.laas.fr/tina/
9. Billington, J., Díaz, M., Rozenberg, G. (eds.): Application of Petri Nets to Communication Networks, Advances in Petri Nets. LNCS, vol. 1605. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
10. 20 states and beyond. Information and Computation (Special issue from LICS90) 98(2), 153-181 (1992)
11. Chandra, S., Godefroid, P., Palm, C.: Software model checking in practice: an industrial case study. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2002), pp. 431-441 (May 2002)
12. Chiola, G., Dutheillet, C., Franceschinis, G., Haddad, S.: On well-formed coloured nets and their symbolic reachability graph. In: Jensen, K., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) Procedings of the 11th International Conference on Application and Theory of Petri Nets (ICATPN 1990). Reprinted in High-Level Petri Nets, Theory and Application. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
13. Chiola, G., Dutheillet, C., Franceschinis, G., Haddad, S.: A symbolic reachability graph for coloured Petri nets. Theoretical Computer Science 176(1-2), 39-65 (1997)
14. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
15. Clarke. E., Wing, J.: Tools and partial analysis. ACM Comput. Surv. 28(4es), 116 (1996)
16. CoQ Project at INRIA. The Coq proof assistant, http://coq.inria.fr/coq- eng.html
17. Couvreur, J.-M., Encrenaz, E., Paviot-Adet, E., Poitrenaud, D., Wacrenier, P.-A.: Data decision diagrams for Petri net analysis. In: Esparza, J., Lakos, C., A. (eds.) ICATPN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2360, pp. 101-120. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
18. Couvreur, J.-M., Thierry-Mieg, Y.: Hierarchical Decision Diagrams to Exploit Model Structure. In: Wang, F. (ed.) FORTE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3731, pp. 443-457. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
19. CPN group, Univ. Aarhus. cpntools - Computer Tool for Coloured Petri Nets (2008), http://wiki.daimi.au.dk/cpntools
20. CS dept. Univ. Hambourg. Renew (2006), http: //www.renew.de
21. CTR team. Modeling and Analysis Suite for Real-Time Applications, http://mast.unican.es/
22. Daws, C., Olivero, A., Tripakis, S., Yovine, S.: The tool Kronos (2002), http://www-verimag.imag.fr/TEMPORI3E/kronos/
23. Ducass, M., Roz, L.: Proof obligations of the b formal method: Local proofs ensure global consistency. In: Bossi, A. (ed.) LOPSTR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1817, pp. 10-29. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
24. Duret-Lutz, A., Poitrenaud, D.: SPOT, Spot Produces Our Traces, http://spot.lip6.fr/wiki/
25. Eiffel software. EiffelStudio - A Complete Integrated Development Environment (2008), http://www.eiffel.com
26. Esterel-technologies. SCADE Suite (2008), http: //www.esterel- technologies.com/
27. Evangelista, S., Kaiser, C., Pajault, C., Pradat-Peyre, J.-F., Rousseau, P.: Dynamic tasks verification with quasar. In: Vardanega, T., Wellings, A.J. (eds.) Ada-Europe 2005. LNCS, vol. 3555, pp. 91-104. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
28. Gilliers, F., Kordon, F., Velu, J.-P.: Generation of distributed programs in their target execution environment. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 127-134. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)
29. Gogen, J., Luqi.: Formal methods: Promises and problems. IEEE Software 14(1), 75-85 (1997)
30. GreatSPN group. GreatSPN home page, http://www.di.unito.it/∼greatspn
31. Holzmann, G.: Logic Verification of ANSI-C Code with SPIN. In: Havelund, K., Penix, J., Visser, W. (eds.) SPIN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1885, pp. 131-147. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
32. Holzmann, G.: On-the-fly, LTL Model Checking with SPIN (2007), http://spinroot.com/spin
33. Holzmann. G., Joshi, R.: Model-driven software verification. In: Graf, S., Mounier, L. (eds.) SPIN 2004. LNCS, vol. 2989, pp. 76-91. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
34. Holzmann, G., Smith, M.: An Automated Verification Method for Distributed Systems Software Based on Model Extraction. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 28(4), 364-377 (2002)
35. Hugues, J., Pautet, L., Zalila, B., Dissaux, P., Perrotin, M.: Using AADL to build critical realtime systems: Experiments in the IST-ASSERT project. In: 4th European Congress ERTS, Toulouse, Paris (January 2008)
36. Hugues, J., Zalila, B., Pautet, L., Kordon, F.: From the Prototype to the Final Embedded System Using the Ocarina AADL Tool Suite. ACM Transactions in Embedded Computing Systems (TECS) (October 2008)
37. Kavimandan, A., Narayanan, A., Gokhale, A.S., Karsai, G.: Evaluating the Correctness and Effectiveness of a Middleware QoS Configuration Process in Distributed Real-Time and Embedded Systems. In: 11th International Symposium on Object-oriented Real-time distributed Computing (ISORC 2008), pp. 100-107. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)
38. Kordon, F.: Design methodologies for embedded systems: Where is the super-glue? In: 11th International Symposium on Object-oriented Real-time distributed Computing (ISORC 2008), Orlando, USA (page to be published, May 2008)
39. Kordon, F., Luqi.: An Introduction to Rapid System Prototyping. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 70(3), 817-821 (2002)
40. Kordon, F., Petrucci, L.: Toward Formal-Methods Oecumenism? IEEE Distributed Systems Online 7(7) (July 2006)
41. Labri. FAST - Fast Acceleration of Symbolic Transition systems (2006), http://www.lsv.ens-cachan.fr/fast
42. LIP6/MoVe. The CPN-AMI home page, http://www.lip6.fr/cpn-ami/
43. Liu, C.L., Layland, J.W.: Scheduling algorithms for multi-programming in hard-real-time environment. Journal of the ACM (January 1973)
44. Spivey, M.: The fuzz type-checker for Z, http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/ mike/fuzz/
45. Madhusudan, P. (ed.): Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Verification of Infinite-State Systems (INFINITY 2007), Lisboa, Portugal, September 2007. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (2007)
46. Mathwork. Simulink - Simulation and Model-Based Design (2008), http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/
47. McMillan, K.L.: The SMV System, http://www.cs.emu.edu/∼modelcheck/ smv.html
48. Meisels, I., Saaltink, M.: The z/eves reference manual (for version 1.5)
49. OMG. A UML profile for MARTE, Beta 1. Technical Report ptc/07-08-04, OMG (2007)
50. OPERA Group, Univ. Cambridge. QPME Homepage (2007), http://www.dvs.tu- darmstadt.de/staff/skounev/QPME/
51. Praxis Hight Integrity Systems. SPARKAda (2008), http://www.praxis-his. com/sparkada/
52. PRISM Team. PRISM - Probabilistic Symbolic Model Checker (2008), http://www.prismmodelchecker.org/
53. SAE. Architecture Analysis & Design Language (AS5506). SAE (September 2004), http://www.sae.org
54. Schmidt, D.: Guest editor's introduction: Model-driven engineering. IEEE Computer 39(2), 25-31 (2006)
55. Selic, B.: The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE Software 20(5), 19-25 (2003)
56. Singhoff, F.: The Cheddar project: a free real time scheduling analyzer (2007), http://beru.univ-brest.fr/∼singhoff/cheddar/
57. SRI/CSL. PVS Specification and Verification System (2008), http://pvs.csl.sri.com/index.shtml
58. Telelogic. Rhapsody (2008). http://www.telelogic.com/products/rhapsody/
59. Upenn, Dept of Computer Science. CHARON, http://rtg.cis.upenn.edu/mobies/ charon/
60. UPPAAL Group. UPPAAL, http://www.uppaal.com/
61. VASY Project - INRIA. Construction and Analysis of Distributed Processes (2005), http://www.inrialpes.fr/vasy/cadp.html
62. VASY Project - INRIA. TRAIAN: A Compiler for E-LOTOS/LOTOS NT Specifications (2008), http://www.inrialpes.fr/vasy/pub/traian