Characterizing relations between architectural views

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5292 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 66-81

  Boucké, Nelis ^a   Weyns, Danny ^a   Hilliard, Rich ^b   Holvoet, Tom ^a   Helleboogh, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Consulting Software Systems Architect ^*

Author keywords

Architectural descriptions; Architectural views; Consistency; IEEE 1471; Integration of views; ISO IEC 42010; Models; View relations; Viewpoint

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TERMINOLOGY;

ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTIONS; ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS; CONSISTENCY; IEEE 1471; ISO/IEC 42010; VIEW RELATIONS; VIEWPOINT;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 56649115716     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88030-1_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Abi-Antoun, M., Aldrich, J., Nahas, N., Schmerl, B., Garlan, D.: Differencing and merging of architectural views. Automated Software Engineering 15(1), 35-74 (2008)
2. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Aspect-oriented development with stratified frameworks. IEEE Software 20(1), 81-89 (2003)
3. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architectures in Practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
4. Boiten, E., Bowman, H., Derrick, J., Linington, P., Steen, M.: Viewpoint consistency in ODP. Computer Networks 34(3), 503-537 (2000)
5. Boucké, N.: xADLComposition: a tool for view composition in xADL, http ://www.cs.kuleuven.be/∼nelis/xADLComposition
6. Boucké, N., Holvoet, T.: View composition in multi-agent architectures. Special issue on Multiagent systems and software architecture, International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (IJAOSE) 2(2), 3-33 (2008)
7. Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Leclercq, M., Quéma, V., Stefani, J.B.: The fractal component model and its support in Java: Experiences with auto-adaptive and reconfigurable systems. Softw. Pract. Exper. 36(11-12), 1257-1284 (2006)
8. Clements, P., Baehman, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures, Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
9. Cordero, R.L., Salavert, I.R.: Relating software architecture views by using MDA. In: Gervasi, O., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds.) ICCSA 2007, Part III. LNCS, vol. 4707, pp. 104-114. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
10. Dashofy, E., van der Hoek, A., Taylor, R.: A comprehensive approach for the development of modular software architecture description languages. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 14(2), 199-245 (2005)
11. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M.: Service-oriented design: a multi-viewpoint approach. International journal of cooperative information systems 13(4), 337-368 (2004)
12. Dijkman, R.M., Quartel, D., van Sinderen, M.J.: Consistency in multi-viewpoint design of enterprise information systems. Information and Software Technology (2007)
13. Dijkman, R.M., Quartel, D.A.C., Pires, L.F., van Sinderen, M.J.: An approach to relate viewpoints and modeling languages. In: Proceedings. Seventh IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 14-27 (2003)
14. Dingwall-Smith, A., Finkelstein, A.: Checking complex compositions of web services against policy constraints. In: MSVVEIS, pp. 94-103, INSTICC PRESS (2007)
15. Egyed, A.: Heterogeneous view integration and its automation. PhD thesis, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Adviser-Barry William Boehm (2000)
16. Finkelstein, A., Kramer, L, Nuseibeh, B., Finkelstein, L., Goedicke, M.: Viewpoints: a framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 2(1), 31-57 (1992)
17. Fradet, P., Le Métayer, D., Périn, M.: Consistency checking for multiple view software architectures. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 24(6), 410-428 (1999)
18. Garlan, D., Monroe, R.T., Wile, D.: ACME: Architectural description of component-based systems. In: Foundations of Component-Based Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
19. Giese, H., Vilbig, A.: Separation of non-orthogonal concerns in software architecture and design. Software and Systems Modeling 5(2), 136-169 (2006)
20. Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied software architecture. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston (2000)
21. IEEE1471. Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems (ANSI/IEEE-Std-1471) (September 2000)
22. ISO. Second working draft of Systems and Software Engineering - Architectural Description (ISO/IEC WD2 42010). Working document: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 N 000
23. ISO. ISO/IEC 10746-2 Information Technology - Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model: Foundations (September 1996)
24. ISO. ISO/IEC 42010 Systems and Software Engineering - Architectural Description (July 2007)
25. Jackson, M.A.: Some complexities in computer-based systems and their implications for system development. In: Proceedings of Comp. Euro. 1990. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos( 1990)
26. Kruchten, P.: The 4+1 view model of architecture. IEEE Software 12(6), 42-50 (1995)
27. Melton, R., Garlan, D.: Architectural unification. In: CASCON 1997: Proceedings of the conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, p. 18 (1997)
28. Muskens, J., Bril, R.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Generalizing consistency checking between software views. In: WICSA 2005: Proceedings of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 169-180. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)
29. Nentwich, C., Capra, L., Emmerich, W., Finkelstein, A.: xlinkit: a consistency checking and smart link generation service. ACM Trans. Inter. Tech. 2(2), 151-185 (2002)
30. Nentwich, C., Emmerich, W., Finkelstein, A., Ellmer, E.: Flexible consistency checking. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 12(1), 28-63 (2003)
31. Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J., Finkelstein, A.: Expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 187-196 (1993)
32. OMG. Model Driven Architecture (MDA)
33. OMG. Unified Modeling Language 2.0: Superstructure (August 2004)
34. OMG. Meta Object Facility 2.0: Query/View/Transformation Specification (August 2007)
35. Oquendo, F.: Pi-adl: an architecture description language based on the higher-order typed picalculus for specifying dynamic and mobile software architectures. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 29(3), 1-14 (2004)
36. Perry, D.E., Wolf, A.L.: Foundations for the study of software architecture. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 17(4), 40-52 (1992)
37. Pinto, M., Fuentes, L.: Ao-adl: An adl for describing aspect-oriented architectures. In: Moreira, A., Grundy, J. (eds.) Early Aspects Workshop 2007 and EACSL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4765, pp. 94-114. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
38. Radjenovic, A., Paige, R.F.: The role of dependency links in ensuring architectural view consistency. In: WICSA 2008: Proceedings of the Seventh Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2008), pp. 199-208 (2008)
39. Ross, D.T.: Structured Analysis (SA): a language for communicating ideas. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-3(1), 16-34 (1977)
40. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)
41. Sabetzadeh, M., Nejati, S., Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M.: A relationship-driven approach to view merging. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 31(6), 1-2 (2006)
42. SAE: Society of Automotive Engineers. Architecture analysis and design language (AADL)
43. Tekinerdogan, B., Hofmann, C., Aksit, M.: Modeling traceability of concerns for synchronizing architectural views. Journal of Object Technology 6(7), 7-25 (2007)
44. W3C. XML path language (XPath), http : //www. w3.org/TR/xpath