Multi-level science mapping with asymmetrical paradigmatic proximity

Networks and Heterogeneous Media

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 267-276

  Cointet, Jean Philippe ^a,b   Chavalarias, David ^a,c  

^a Centre de Recherche en Epistemologie Appliquee Ecole Polytechnique   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c ISC PIF   (France)

Author keywords

Asymmetric proximity measure; Co word analysis; Mapping and visualization of knowledge; Paradigmatic proximity; Semantic network

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; SEMANTICS; VISUALIZATION;

CO-WORD ANALYSIS; PARADIGMATIC PROXIMITY; PROXIMITY MEASURE; SEMANTIC NETWORK; VISUALIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE;

MAPPING;

EID: 56649097114     PISSN: 15561801     EISSN: 1556181X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.267     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. R. Buter and E. Noyons, Using bibliometric maps to visualise term distribution in scientific papers, in "Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'02)", (2002), 697-702.
2. M. Callon, S. Bauin and J. P. Courtial, From translation to problematic networks: an introduction to coword analysis, Social Science Information, 22 (1983), 191-235.
3. M. Callon, J. P. Courtial and F. Laville, Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interaction between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry, Scientometrics, 22 (1991), 155-205.
4. D. Chavalarias and J. P. Cointet, Bottom-up scientific field detection for dynamical and hierarchical science mapping - methodology and case study, Scientometrics, 75 (2008), 37-50.
5. L. Danon, A. Diaz-Guilera, J. Duch and A. Arenas, Comparing community structure identification, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 9 (2005).
6. L. Doyle, Semantic road maps for literature searchers, J. ACM, 8 (1961), 553-578.
7. I. Farkas, D. Ábel, G. Palla and T. Vicsek, Weighted network modules, New Journal of Physics, 9 (2007).
8. D. Hull, "Science as a Process: an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science," Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
9. T. Kuhn, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Postscript," Second edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
10. B. Latour, "Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society," Harvard University Press, 1988.
11. B. Latour and S. Woolgar, "Laboratory Life: the Social Construction of Scientific Facts," Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1986.
12. X. Lin and D. Soergel, A self organizing semantic map for information retrieval, in "Proc. 14th International SIGIR Conference", (1991), 262-269.
13. I. Marshakova-Shaikevich, Bibliometric maps of field of science, Infometrics, 41 (2005), 1534-1547.
14. E. Noyons and A. van Raan, "Dealing with the Data Flood. Mining Data, Text and Multimedia," The Hague: STT/Beweton: J. Meij (ed.), 2002, 64-72.
15. G. Palla, A. L. Barabási and T. Vicsek, Quantifying social group evolution Nature, 446 (2007), 664-667.
16. G. Palla, I. Derenyi, I. Farkas and T. Vicsek, Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society Nature, 435 (2005), 814-818.
17. G. Palla, I. Farkas, P. Pollner, I. Derényi and T. Vicsek, Directed network modules, New Journal of Physics, 9 (2007).
18. Y. Sun, Methods for automated concept mapping between medical databases J. of Biomedical Informatics, 37 (2004), 162-178.
19. P. Van den Besselaar and G. Heimeriks, Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study Scientometrics, 68 (2006), 377-393.