Hemodynamic wall shear stress profiles influence the magnitude and pattern of stenosis in a pig AV fistula

Kidney International

Volumn 74, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1410-1419

  Krishnamoorthy, Mahesh K ^a   Banerjee, Rupak K ^a   Wang, Yang ^b   Zhang, Jianhua ^b   Roy, Abhijit Sinha ^b   Khoury, Saeb F ^b   Arend, Lois J ^c   Rudich, Steve ^b   Roy Chaudhury, Prabir ^b  

^a University of Cincinnati   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

AV fistula configuration; Computational fluid dynamics; Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction; Hemodynamics; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERIAL WALL THICKENING; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTERY MEDIA; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMODYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; STENOSIS; SWINE; VEIN WALL;

ANIMALS; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HEMODYNAMICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE;

EID: 56549111636     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.379     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Beasley C, Rowland J, Spergel L. Fistula first: an update for renal providers. Nephrol News Issues 2004; 18: 88-90.
2. Beathard GA. Strategy for maximizing the use of arteriovenous fistulae. Semin Dial 2000; 13: 291-296.
3. DOQI. III. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37(1 Suppl 1): S137-S181.
4. Hemphill H, Allon M, Konner K et al. How can the use of arteriovenous fistulas be increased? Semin Dial 2003; 16: 214-223.
5. Allon M, Robbin ML. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 1109-1124.
6. Nasser G, Nguyen B, Rhee E et al. Endovascular treatment of the 'failing to mature' arteriovenous fistula. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 275-280.
7. Beathard GA. Angioplasty for arteriovenous grafts and fistulae. Semin Nephrol 2002; 22: 202-210.
8. Beathard GA, Arnold P, Jackson J et al. Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1487-1494.
9. Roy-Chaudhury P, Arend L, Zhang J et al. Neointimal hyperplasia in early arteriovenous fistula failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 50: 782-790.
10. Van Tricht I, De Wachter D, Tordoir J et al. Hemodynamics and complications encountered with arteriovenous fistulas and grafts as vascular access for hemodialysis: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 2005; 33: 1142-1157.
11. Konner K, Nonnast-Daniel B, Ritz E. The arteriovenous fistula. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1669-1680.
12. Corpataux JM, Haesler E, Silacci P et al. Low-pressure environment and remodelling of the forearm vein in Brescia-Cimino haemodialysis access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 1057-1062.
13. Asif A, Roy-Chaudhury P, Beathard G. Early arteriovenous fistula failure: a logical proposal for when and how to intervene. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 332-339.
14. Mattsson EJ, Kohler TR, Vergel SM et al. Increased blood flow induces regression of intimal hyperplasia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17: 2245-2249.
15. Rajamohan D, Banerjee RK, Back LH et al. Developing pulsatile flow in a deployed coronary stent. J Biomech Eng 2006; 128: 347-359.
16. Banerjee RK, Devarakonda SB, Rajamohan D et al. Developed pulsatile flow in a deployed coronary stent. Biorheology 2007; 44: 91-102.
17. Wang Y, Krishnamoorthy M, Banerjee R et al. Venous stenosis in a pig arteriovenous (AV) fistula model: anatomy, mechanisms and cellular phenotypes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 525-533.
18. Sivanesan S, How TV, Black RA et al. Flow patterns in the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula: an in vitro study. J Biomech 1999; 32: 915-925.
19. Loth F, Jones SA, Zarins CK et al. Relative contribution of wall shear stress and injury in experimental intimal thickening at PTFE end-to-side arterial anastomoses. J Biomech Eng 2002; 124: 44-51.
20. Loth F, Fischer PF, Arslan N et al. Transitional flow at the venous anastomosis of an arteriovenous graft: potential activation of the ERK1/2 mechanotransduction pathway. J Biomech Eng 2003; 125: 49-61.
21. Ene-Iordache B, Mosconi L, Remuzzi G et al. Computational fluid dynamics of a vascular access case for hemodialysis. J Biomech Eng 2001; 123: 284-292.
22. Lehoux S, Castier Y, Tedgui A. Molecular mechanisms of the vascular responses to haemodynamic forces. J Intern Med 2006; 259: 381-392.
23. Harrison DG, Widder J, Grumbach I et al. Endothelial mechanotransduction, nitric oxide and vascular inflammation. J Intern Med 2006; 259: 351-363.
24. Worth Longest P, Kleinstreuer C. Comparison of blood particle deposition models for non-parallel flow domains. J Biomech 2003; 36: 421-430.
25. Honda HM, Hsiai T, Wortham CM et al. A complex flow pattern of low shear stress and flow reversal promotes monocyte binding to endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2001; 158: 385-390.
26. Fry DL. Acute vascularendothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res 1968; 22: 165-197.
27. Hofstra L, Bergmans DC, Leunissen KM et al. Prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas and venous anastomotic stenosis: influence of a high flow velocity on the development of intimal hyperplasia. Blood Purif 1996; 14: 345-349.
28. Hofstra L, Bergmans DC, Leunissen KM et al. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis is associated with initial high flow velocity and not with mismatch in elastic properties. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 1625-1633.