Epistemic actions in science education

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5248 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 202-215

  Kastens, Kim A ^a,b   Liben, Lynn S ^c   Agrawal, Shruti ^a  

^a International Research Institute for Climate and Society

^b Pennsylvania State University ^*

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistemic actions; Science education; Spatial cognition

Indexed keywords

CANDIDATE MODELS; EPISTEMIC ACTIONS; FIELD NOTES; FIELD OF VIEWS; FULL SCALES; GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; PHYSICAL ASPECTS; PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTS; PRIOR WORKS; RE-ORDERS; SCIENCE EDUCATION; SCIENCE EDUCATIONS; SKETCH MAPS; SPATIAL COGNITION; SPATIAL CONFIGURATIONS; SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 56549098456     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Kirsh, D., Maglio, P.: On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cog. Sci. 18, 513-549 (1994)
2. Maglio, P., Kirsh, D.: Epistemic action increases with skill. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (1996)
3. Kastens, K.A., Ishikawa, T., Liben, L.S.: Visualizing a 3-D geological structure from out-crop observations: Strategies used by geoscience experts, students and novices [abstract]. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program, 171-173 (2006)
4. Kastens, K.A., Agrawal, S., Liben, L.S.: Research in Science Education: The Role of Gestures in Geoscience Teaching and Learning. In: Geosci, J. (ed.) (2008)
5. Broadbent, D.E.: Perception and Communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1958)
6. Desimone, R., Duncan, J.: Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Ann. Rev. of Neurosci. 18, 193-222 (2000)
7. Ballard, D.H., Hayhoe, M.M., Pook, P.K., Rao, R.P.N.: Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Beh. & Brain Sci. 20, 723-767 (1997)
8. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cog. Sci. 11, 65-99 (1987)
9. Shepard, R.N., Metzler, J.: Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Sci. 171, 701-703 (1971)
10. Liben, L.S., Downs, R.M.: Understanding Person-Space-Map Relations: Cartographic and Developmental Perspectives. Dev. Psych. 29, 739-752 (1993)
11. Goodwin, C.: Practices of Color Classification. Mind, Cult., Act. 7, 19-36 (2000)
12. Kirsh, D.: The intelligent use of space. Artif. Intel. 73, 31-68 (1995)
13. Goodman, N.: Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Hackett, Indianapolis (1976)
14. Potter, M.C.: Mundane Symbolism: The relations among objects, names, and ideas. In: Smith, N.R., Franklin, M.B. (eds.) Symbolic functioning in childhood, pp. 41-65. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1979)
15. DeLoache, J.S.: Dual representation and young children's use of scale models. Child Dev. 71, 329-338 (2000)
16. Liben, L.S.: Developing an Understanding of External Spatial Representations. In: Sigel, I.E. (ed.) Development of mental representation: theories and applications, pp. 297-321. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1999)
17. Liben, L.S.: Education for Spatial Thinking. In: Renninger, K.A., Sigel, I.E. (eds.) Hand-book of child psychology, 6th edn., vol. 4, pp. 197-247. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)
18. Uttal, D.H., Liu, L.L., DeLoache, J.S.: Concreteness and symbolic development. In: Balter, L., Tamis-LeMonde, C.S. (eds.) Child Psychology: A Handbook of Contemporary Issues, pp. 167-184. Psychology Press, New York (2006)
19. Liben, L.S., Myers, L.J., Kastens, K.A.: Locating oneself on a map in relation to person qualities and map characteristics. In: Freska, C., Newcombe, N.S., Gärdenfors, P. (eds.) Spatial Cognition VI. LNCS, vol. 5248. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
20. Kirlik, A.: The ecological expert: Acting to create information to guide action. In: The Conference on Human Interaction with Complex Systems, Piscataway, NJ (1998)
21. Cowley, S.J., MacDorman, K.F.: What baboons, babies and Tetris players tell us about interaction: A biosocial view of norm-based social learning. Cog. Sci. 18, 363-378 (2006)
22. National Research Council.: National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington (1996)
23. Schwan, S., Riempp, R.: The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learn. and Instr. 14, 293-305 (2004)
24. Magnani, L.: Model-based and manipulative abduction in science. Found. of Sci. 9, 219-247 (2004)
25. Roth, W.M.: From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: The bridging function of gestures. Prag. and Cogn. 11, 141-170 (2003)