Single technology appraisals by NICE: Are they delivering faster guidance to the NHS?

PharmacoEconomics

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1037-1043

  Barham, Leela ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Formularies; Health policy

Indexed keywords

ANASTROZOLE; BEVACIZUMAB; CAPECITABINE; CETUXIMAB; DOXORUBICIN; EXEMESTANE; IRINOTECAN; LETROZOLE; OXALIPLATIN; PACLITAXEL; RALTITREXED; TEGAFUR; TOPOTECAN;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CANCER RESEARCH; DRUG DESIGN; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SINGLE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISAL; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; DRUG APPROVAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEOPLASMS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 56549095858     PISSN: 11707690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/0019053-200826120-00006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. United Kingdom Parliament. Select Committee on Health: written evidence. Evidence submitted by the American Pharmaceutical Group (NICE 89). 2007 Mar [online]. Available from URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/ cmselect/cmhealth/503/503we06.htm [Accessed 2008 Jul 1]
2. United Kingdom Parliament. Select Committee on Health: written evidence. Evidence submitted by the Bioindustry Association (BIA). 2007 Mar [online]. Available from URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/ cmhealth/503/503we14.htm [Accessed 2008 Jul 1]
3. United Kingdom Parliament. Select Committee on Health: written evidence. Evidence submitted by Bowel Cancer UK. 2007 Mar [online]. Available from URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmhealth/503/503we15. htm [Accessed 2008 Jul 1]
4. United Kingdom Parliament. Select Committee on Health: written evidence. Evidence submitted by Cancer Research UK. 2007 Mar [online]. Available from URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmhealth/503/ 503we22.htm [Accessed 2008 Jul 1]
5. United Kingdom Parliament. Select Committee on Health: written evidence. Evidence submitted by Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2007 Mar [online]. Available from URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/ cmselect/cmhealth/503/503we64.htm [Accessed 2008 Jul 1]
6. House of Commons Health Committee. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. First report of session 2007-08: volume 1. London: The Stationery Office Limited, 2007 Dec 17 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmhealth/27/27.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jun 13]
7. National Institute for Health Research. NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme. HTA work with NICE [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ncchta.org/about/customers/NICE/index.shtml [Accessed 2008 Jun 13]
8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Consultation on the process for single technology appraisals [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/devnicetech/ technologyappraisalprocessguides/singletechnology appraisalsprocess/ consultation_on_the_process_for_single_technology_appraisals.jsp [Accessed 2008 Jun 13]
9. Office of Fair Trading. Annexe B: review of NICE, SMC, and AWMSG. London: OFT, 2007 Feb [online]. Available from URL: http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/ reports/comp_policy/oft885b.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jun 13]
10. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the single (STA) process. London: NICE, 2006: 8, 33 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/STA_Process_Guide.pdf#null [Accessed 2008 Oct 1]
11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk [Accessed 2008 Oct 1]
12. Electronic Medicines Compendium [online]. Available from URL: http://emc.medicines.org.uk/ [Accessed 2008 Sep 17]