The influence of mutation on protein-ligand docking optimization: A locality analysis

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5199 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 589-598

  Tavares, Jorge ^a   Tantar, Alexandru Adrian ^a   Melab, Nouredine ^a   Talbi, El Ghazali ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNEALING; DOCKING; KETONES; LIGANDS; TRELLIS CODES; ALGORITHMS; PROTEINS;

CAUCHY DISTRIBUTIONS; EFFICIENT ALGORITHMS; EVOLUTIONARY APPROACHES; GAUSSIAN; LIGAND DOCKING; MUTATION OPERATORS; SMALL VARIATIONS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

CAUCHY DISTRIBUTION; EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH; GAUSSIANS; MUTATION OPERATORS; PROTEIN-LIGAND DOCKING; REAL VALUES; SMALL VARIATIONS;

EID: 56449115907     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87700-4_59     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Neumaier, A.: Molecular modeling of proteins and mathematical prediction of protein structure. SIAM Review 39, 407-460 (1997)
2. Morris, G.M., Olson, A.J., Goodsell, D.S.: Protein-ligand docking. In: Clark, D.E. (ed.) Evolutionary Algorithms in Molecular Design, pp. 31-48. Wiley-VCH (2000)
3. Thomsen, R.: Protein-ligand docking with evolutionary algorithms. in: Fogel, G.B., Corne, D.W., Pan, Y. (eds.) Computational intelligence in Bioinformatics, pp. 169-195. Wiley-IEEE Press, Chichester (2008)
4. Korb, O., Stützle, T., Exner, T.: An ant colony optimization approach to flexible protein-ligand docking. Swarm intelligence 1, 115-134 (2007)
5. Thomsen, R.: Flexible ligand docking using evolutionary algorithms: investigating the effects of variation operators and local search hybrids. Biosystems 72, 57-73 (2003)
6. Sendhoff, B., Kreutz, M., Seelen, W.V.: A condition for the genotype-phenotype mapping: Casualty. in: 7th Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 73-80 (1997)
7. Rothlauf, F.: On the locality of representations. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2003), pp. 1608-1609 (2003)
8. Raidl, G.R., Gottlieb, J.: Empirical analysis of locality heriability and heuristic bias in evolutionary algorithms: A case study for the multidimensional knapsack problem. Evolutionary Computation Journal 13, 441-475 (2005)
9. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K., Olson, A.J.: Automated docking using a lamarckian genetic algorithm and and empirical binding free energy function. Journal of Computational Chemistry 19, 1639-1662 (1998)
10. Pereira, F.B., Marques, J., Leitão, T., Tavares, J.: Analysis of locality in hybrid evolutionary cluster optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 8049-8056. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2006)
11. Dixon, J.S.: Flexible docking of ligands to receptor sites using genetic algorithms. In: Proc. of the 9th European Symposium on Structure-Activity Relationships, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 412-413. ESCOM Science Publishers (1993)
12. Moitessier, N., Englebienne, P., Lee, D., Lawandi, J., Corbeil, C: Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go. British Journal of Pharmacology 153, 1-20 (2007)
13. Wright, S.: The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. In: Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Genetics, vol. 1, pp. 356-366 (1932)
14. Jones, T.: Evolutionary Algorithms, Fitness Landscapes and Search. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico (1995)
15. Weinberger, E.D.: Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference. Biological Cybernetics 63, 325-336 (1990)