Looking below the surface: The use of electronic journals by the members of a library consortium

Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 76-85

  Termens, Miquel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56449104459     PISSN: 14649055     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lcats.2008.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson D. Allocation of costs for electronic products in academic library consortia. College & Research Libraries 67 2 (2006) 123-135
2. Anglada L. Working together, learning together: The Consortium of Academic Libraries of Catalonia. Information Technology and Libraries 18 3 (1999) 139-144
3. Anglada L., Comellas N., Roig J., Ros R., and Tort M. Licensing, organizing and accessing e-journals in the Catalan university libraries. Serials 16 3 (2003) 299-306
4. Ashcroft L. Win-win-win: Can the evaluation and promotion of electronic journals bring benefits to library suppliers, information professionals and users?. Library Management 21 9 (2000) 466-471
5. Blanco A. University libraries consortia in Spain. Serials 16 1 (2003) 53-55
6. Borrego A., Anglada L., Barrios M., and Comellas N. Use and users of electronic journals at catalan universities: The results of a survey. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33 1 (2007) 67-75
7. Bostick S.L. The history and development of academic library consortia in the United States: An overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 27 2 (2001) 128-130
8. Case M.M. A snapshot in time: ARL libraries and electronic journal resources. ARL Bimonthly Report 235 (2004)
9. COUNTER (2005). The COUNTER code of practice. Journals and databases: Release 2 (2005). COUNTER. 27 pp. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://www.projectcounter.org/code_practice.html
10. Davis P.M. Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries 63 6 (2002) 484-497
11. Davis P.M., and Price J.S. eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: Implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 9 (2006) 1243-1248
12. Frazier K. The librarians' dilemma. Contemplating the costs of the 'big deal'. D-Lib Magazine 7 3 (2001)
13. Frazier K. What's the big deal?. The Serials Librarian 48 1/2 (2005) 49-59
14. Friend F.J. Library consortia in the electronic age. Alexandria 14 1 (2002) 17-24
15. Friend F.J. Big deal - good deal? Or is there a better deal?. Learned Publishing 16 2 (2003) 153-155
16. Giordano T. Library consortium models in Europe: A comparative analysis. Alexandria 14 1 (2002) 41-52
17. Hahn, K. (2006). The state of the large publisher bundle: Findings from an ARL member survey. ARL Bimonthly Report, 245. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/245/bundle.html
18. King D.W., and Xu H. The role of library consortia in electronic journal services. The Consortium site licence: is it a sustainable model? (2002, 24 September, London) (2002), Ingenta Institute, Oxford 7-76
19. King, D.W., Tenopir, C.; Montgomery, C.H., & Aerni, S.E. (2003). Patterns of journal use by faculty at three diverse universities. D-Lib Magazine. 9(10). Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/king/10king.html
20. Kohl D.F. Consortial licensing vs. tradition: Breaking up is hard to do. Learned Publishing 16 1 (2003) 47-53
21. Nicholas D., Huntington P., and Watkinson A. Scholarly journal usage: The results of deep log analysis. Journal of Documentation 61 2 (2005) 248-280
22. Peters T.A. What's the big deal?. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 27 4 (2001) 302-304
23. Peters T.A. E-reference: How consortia add value. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 28 4 (2002) 248-250
24. Pullinger D., and Baldwin C. Electronic journals and user behaviour: Learning for the future from the SuperJournal Project (2002), Deedot Press, Cambridge
25. Quint B. Six rules of engagement: Negotiating deals with vendors. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances 10 1 (1997) 4-10
26. Sanville T. Use levels and new models for consortial purchasing of electronic journals. Library Consortium Management 1 3/4 (1999) 47-58
27. Sanville T. A method out of the madness: OhioLINK's collaborative response to the serials crisis three years later: A progress report. The Serials Librarian 40 1/2 (2001) 129-155
28. Sanville T. The trends they are a'changing. In: Strauch K. (Ed). Charleston Conference proceedings 2001 (2003), Libraries Unlimited, Westport 11-20
29. Shreeves E. The acquisitions culture wars. Library Trends 48 4 (2000) 877-890
30. Sloan B. Allocating costs in a consortial environment: A methodology for library consortia. OCLC Systems & Services 15 1 (1999) 45-52
31. Tenopir C. Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. (2003), Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington DC
32. Tenopir C., and King D.W. Communication patterns of engineers. (2004), John Wiley, Hoboken
33. Tenopir C., King D.W., Boyce P., Grayson M., and Paulson K.-L. Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56 8 (2005) 786-802
34. Urbano, C., Borrego, A., Cosculluela, A., & Cantos, C. (2004). The use of consortially purchased electronic journals by the CBUC (2000-2003). D-Lib magazine, 10(6). Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/anglada/06anglada.html
35. Voorbij H., and Ongering H. The use of electronic journals by Dutch researchers: A descriptive and exploratory study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 3 (2006) 223-237
36. Kohl D.F., and Sanville T. More bang for the buck: Increasing the effectiveness of library expenditures through cooperation. Library Trends 54 3 (2006) 394-410