The effect of time synchronization of wireless sensors on the modal analysis of structures

Smart Materials and Structures

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages

  Krishnamurthy, V ^a   Fowler, K ^b   Sazonov, E ^a  

^a Clarkson University   (United States)

^b CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; EXPERIMENTS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY RESPONSE; HYBRID SENSORS; MAINTENANCE; MODAL ANALYSIS; SENSORS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; STRUCTURAL PANELS; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); SYNCHRONIZATION; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

ALUMINUM BEAMS; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN DECOMPOSITIONS; HEALTH MONITORING; INSTALLATION COSTS; KEY FACTORS; LOSSLESS DATUMS; LOW POWERS; MAINTENANCE COSTS; MEASURED SYSTEMS; MODAL IDENTIFICATIONS; MODE SHAPES; NORMAL CONDITIONS; OUTPUT RESPONSES; THEORETICAL MODELS; TIME SYNCHRONIZATIONS; TIME- DELAYS; VERY SMALL DELAYS; WIRELESS INTELLIGENT SENSORS; WIRELESS SENSORS;

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

EID: 56449090391     PISSN: 09641726     EISSN: 1361665X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/5/055018     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Doebling S W, Farrar C R and Prime M B 1998 A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods Shock Vib. Dig. 30 91-105
2. Cunha A and Caetano E 2005 From input-output to output-only modal identification of civil engineering structures Proc. 1st Int. Operational Analysis Conf. (Denmark)
3. Ren W X and Zong Z H 2003 Output-only modal parameter identification of civil engineering structures Struct. Eng. Mech. 17 429-44
4. Felber A J 1993 Development of a hybrid bridge evaluation system PhD Thesis University of British Columbia (UBC) Vancouver, Canada
5. Brincker R, Zhang L and Andersen P 2001 Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition Proc. 18th Int. Modal Analysis Conf. (Kissimmee)
6. Brincker R, Ventura C and Andersen P 2000 Damping estimation by frequency domain decomposition Proc. 19th Int. Modal Analysis Conf. (San Antonio)
7. Andersen P, Brincker R and Kirkegaard P H 1996 Theory of covariance equivalent ARMAV models of civil engineering structures IMAC14: Proc 14th Int. Modal Analysis Conf. (Dearborn, MI) pp518-24
8. Ibrahim S R and Mikulcik E C 1977 A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free response Shock Vib. Bull. 47 183-98
9. Peeters B et al 1996 Evaluation of structural damage by dynamic system identification Proc. ISMA21 (Leuven) vol 3 pp1349-61
10. Overschee P and Moor B 1996 Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory, Implementation, Applications (The Netherlands: Kluwer-Academic)
11. Mills D L 1991 Internet time synchronization: the network time protocol IEEE Trans. Commun. 39 1482-93
12. Ishikawa K I and Mita A 2008 Time synchronization of a wired sensor network for structural health monitoring Smart Mater. Struct. 17 015016
13. Sivrikaya F and Yener B 2004 Time synchronization in sensor networks: a survey IEEE Netw. 18 45-50
14. Elson J, Girod L and Estrin D 2002 Fine-grained network time synchronization using reference broadcasts Proc. 5th Symp. Operating Systems Design and Implementation (Boston, MA)
15. Ganeriwal S, Kumar R and Srivastava M B 2003 Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (New York: ACM) pp138-49
16. Sichitiu M L and Veerarittiphan C 2003 Simple, accurate time synchronization for wireless sensor networks WCNC
17. Greunen J V and Rabaey J 2003 Lightweight time synchronization for sensor networks Proc. 2nd ACM Int. Conf. Wireless Sensor Networks and Apps (San Diego, CA)
18. Straser E G and Kiremidjian A S 1998 A modular wireless damage monitoring system for structures John A Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Report 114 pp18-20
19. Wang Y, Lynch J P and Law K H 2007 A wireless structural health monitoring system with multithreaded sensing devices: design and validation Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 3 103-20
20. Wireless intelligent sensor and actuator network (WISAN) http://www.intelligent-systems.info/wisan.htm.
21. Sazonov E, Jha R, Janoyan K, Krishnamurthy V, Fuchs M and Cross K 2006 Wireless intelligent sensor and actuator network (WISAN): a scalable ultra-low-power platform for structural health monitoring Proc. SPIE 6177 61770S
22. Texas Instruments www.ti.com.
23. Chipcon Inc. 2004 www.chipcon.com.
24. Krishnamurthy V and Sazonov E A 2008 Reservation-based protocol for monitoring applications using IEEE802.15.4 sensor networks Int. J. Sensor Netw. 4 at press
25. LIS3L02AQ 3 axis linear accelerometer, STMicroelectronics Inc. www.st.com
26. Osnaga S M 2005 On rank one matrices and invariant subspaces Balkan J. Geom. Appl. 10 145-8
27. ARTeMIS-Operational Modal Analysis Software provided by Structural Vibration Solutions A/S http://www.svibs.com/
28. Engineers Toolbox for the Desktop http://www.engrasp.com/
29. Online Materials Information Resource-MatWeb http://www.matweb.com/
30. Lawson C L and Hanson R J 1974 Solving Least Squares Problems vol 23 (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall) p161
31. Sazonov E S, Klinkhachorn P, Halabe U B and GangaRao H V S 2003 Non-baseline detection of small damages from changes in strain energy mode shapes Non-Destruct. Test. Eval. 18 91-107
32. Greunen J V and Rabaey J 2003 Lightweight time synchronization for sensor networks Proc. WSNA (San Diego, CA)