Primary percutaneous coronary intervention through transulnar approach: Safety and effectiveness;Intervenção coronariana percutânea primária pelo acesso transulnar: Segurança e eficácia

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  De Andrade, Pedro Beraldo ^a,b,d   Tebet, Marden André ^a,b   De Andrade, Mônica Vieira Athanazio ^a   Labrunie, André ^a,b   Mattos, Luiz Alberto Piva ^a,c  

^a Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Marilia   (Brazil)

^b Hospital do Coracao de Londrina   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUTO DANTE PAZZANESE DE CARDIOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^d NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; HEPARIN; TIROFIBAN;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DIABETES MELLITUS; DYSLIPIDEMIA; HUMAN; LOADING DRUG DOSE; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SAFETY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TRANSRADIAL APPROACH; TRANSULNAR APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ECHOGRAPHY; HAND; HEART INFARCTION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; ULNAR ARTERY; VASCULARIZATION;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RADIAL ARTERY; ULNAR ARTERY;

EID: 56449089818     PISSN: 0066782X     EISSN: 16784170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0066-782X2008001600017     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the ACCESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1269-75.
2. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2001; 52: 181-7.
3. Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, Rossini R, Tespili M, Guagliumi G, et al. Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2006; 67: 870-8.
4. Terashima M, Meguro T, Takeda H, Endoh N. Percutaneous ulnar artery approach for coronary angiography: a preliminary report in nine patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2001; 53: 410-4.
5. Dashkoff N, Dashkoff PB, Zizzi JA, Wadhwani J. Ulnar artery cannulation for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: case reports and anatomic considerations. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2002; 55: 93-6.
6. Lanspa TJ, Reyes AP, Oldemeyer JB, Willians MA. Ulnar artery catheterization with occlusion of corresponding radial artery. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 61: 211-3.
7. Mangin L, Bertrand OF, De La Rochellière R, Proulx G, Lemay R, Barbeau G, et al. The transulnar approach for coronary intervention: a safe alternative to transradial approach in selected patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005; 17: 77-9.
8. Aptecar E, Dupouy P, Chabane-Chaouch M, Bussy N, Catarino G, Shahmir A, et al. Percutaneous transulnar artery approach for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005; 17: 312-7.
9. Limbruno U, Rossini R, De Carlo M, Amoroso G, Ciabatti N, Petronio AS, et al. Percutaneous ulnar artery approach for primary coronary angioplasty: safety and feasibility. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 61: 56-9.
10. Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, Bussy N, Catarino G, Shahmir A, et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA Study. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2006; 67: 711-20.