Effect of projective viewpoint in detecting temporal density changes

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5370 I, Issue , 2004, Pages 85-92

  Raundahl, Jakob ^a   Nielsen, Mads ^a   Olsen, Ole F ^a   Bagger, Yu Z ^b  

^a IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND BASIC RESEARCH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Density; HRT; Mammography; Projection; Segmentation; Symmetry; Temporal

Indexed keywords

DENSITY; HRT; MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES; PROJECTION; SEGMENTATION; SYMMETRY; TEMPORAL;

DISEASES; HORMONES; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; OPTICAL CORRELATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; TUMORS; X RAYS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 5644302630     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.535319     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. L. A. G. Ries, M. P. Eisner, C. L. Kosary, and et al., "SEER Camcer Statistics Review, 1973-1998," National Cancer Institute, 2001.
2. J. Elmore, M. B. Barton, V. M. Moceri, S. Polk, P. J. Arena, and S. W. Fletcher, "Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations," N Engl J Med 338, pp. 1089-96, April 1998.
3. J. N. Wolfe, "Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern," Cancer 37(5), pp. 2486-2498, 1976.
4. N. F. Boyd, B. O'Sullivan, J. E. Campbell, and et al., "Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer," British Journal of Cancer 45, pp. 185-193, 1982.
5. N. F. Boyd, J. W. Byng, R. A. Jong, E. K. Fishell, L. E. Little, A. B. Miller, G. A. Lockwood, D. L. Trichler, and M. J. Yaffe, "Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian national breast screening study," Academic Radiology 87(9), pp. 670-675, 1995.
6. C. H. van Gils, J. H. C. L. Hendriks, R. Holland, N. Karssemeijer, J. D. M. Otten, H. Straatman, and A. L. M. Verbeek, "Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk," European Journal of Cancer Prevention 8, pp. 509-515, 1999.
7. http://www.acr.org/departments/stand.accred/birads/contents.html, "BI-RADS Contents: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System,"
8. E. Warner, G. Lockwood, D. Trichler, and et al, "The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification," Cancer Detection & Prevention 16, pp. 67-72, 1992.
9. J. W. Byng, N. F. Boyd, L. Little, G. Lockwood, E. Fishell, R. A. Jong, and M. J. Yaffe, "Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographie images," European Journal of Cancer Prevention 5, pp. 319-327, 1996.
10. G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin, "Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographie density," J Natl Cancer Inst., January 2003.
11. N. Colacurci, F. Fornaro, P. D. Franciscis, M. Palermo, and W. del Vecchio, "Effects of different types of hormone replacement therapy on mammographie density.," Maturitas 40, November 2001.
12. G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, A. Sie, H. R. Singh, L. K. Olson, O. Gatewood, L. W. Bassett, C. Wasilauskas, T. Bush, and E. Barrett-Connor, "Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density, postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (pepi) investigators.," Ann Intern Med. 2, February 1999.
13. F. Sendag, M. T. Cosan, S. Ozsener, K. Oztekin, O. Bilgin, I. Bilgen, and A. Memis, "Mammographic density changes during different postmenopausal hormone replacement therapies," Ann Intern Med. 76, September 2001.
14. R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, 2002.
15. M. A. Maloof, S. V. Beiden, and R. F. Wagner, "Analysis of competing classifiers using components of variance of roc accuracy measures," CS 1, 2002.
16. R. T. Senie, A. F. Saftlas, L. A. Brinton, and R. N. Hoover, "Is breast size a predictor of breast cancer risk or the laterality of the tumor?," Cancer Causes Control 4, pp. 203-208, may 1993.