Everyday life objectivity

Social Epistemology

Volumn 18, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 123-138

  Bos, Jaap ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Freudian discourse; Language purification; Strategies of objectification; Symbolic power

Indexed keywords

EID: 5644278042     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0269172042000249255     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Billig, M. 1991. Ideology and opinion. London: Sage.
2. Bos, J. 2001. Notes on a controversy: the question of Lay-Analysis. Psychoanalysis and History 3(2): 153-69.
3. Bos, J. 2003. A silent antipode. The making and breaking of psychoanalyst Wilhelm Stekel. History of psychology, 6: 331-61.
4. Bourdieu, P. 1992. Language and symbolic power. Cambidge: Polity Press.
5. Bourdieu, P. 1998. Practical reason. On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Decker, H. 1977. Freud in Germany. Revolution ana reaction in science 1893-1907. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
7. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Freud, E., ed. 1960. The letters of Sigmund Freud. New York: Basin Books.
9. Freud, S. 1900. The interpretation of dreams. S.E. 4/5. London: The Hogarth Press.
10. Freud, S. 1901. The psychopathology of everyday life. S.E. 6. London: The Hogarth Press.
11. Freud, S. 1905. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. S.E. 8. London: The Hogarth Press.
12. Fromm, E. 1959. Sigmund Freud's mission. New York: Harper & Brothers.
13. Grünbaum, A. 1985. The foundations of psychoanalysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. Jones, E. 1953-57. The life and work of Sigmund Freud. 3 vols. New York: Basic Books.
15. Jaffe, S. 1990. Freud als Rhetoriker. In J. Kopperschmidt, ed. Rhetorik, Bd. I. Rhetorik als texttheorie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: 363-84.
16. Kuhn, P. 1999. A Professor through the looking-glass: contending narratives of Freud's relationship with the sisters Bernay. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85: 943-59.
17. Mahony, P. 1987. Freud as a writer. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. McGuire, W., ed. 1974. The Freud/Jung letters. London: The Hogarth Press.
19. Moscovici, S. 1961. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF.
20. Mumby, D. K. 1988. Communication and power in organizations: discourse, ideology, and domination. Norwood: Ablex.
21. Parker, J. 2000. Structuration. Buckingham: Open University Press.
22. Reve, K. van het. 1994. Dr. Freud und Sherlock Holmes. Frankfurt: Fischer.
23. Sachs, H. 1944. Freud. Master and friend. London, Imago.
24. Schröter, M. 1996. Zur Frühgeschichte der Laienanalyse. Strukturen eines Kernkonflikts der Freud-Schule. Psyche 50: 1127-75.
25. Skues, R. A. 2003. On the dating of Freud's aliquis slip. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 84: 1185-204.
26. Stekel, W. 1921. Nervöse Angstzustände und ihre Behandlung. 2nd ed. Berlin: Urban und Schwarzenberg.
27. Sulloway, F. J. 1979. Freud. Biologist of the mind. New York: Legend.
28. Szasz, T. 1970. The manufacture of madness. New York: Harper & Row.
29. Thompson, J. B. 1995. The media and modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Timpanaro, S. 1976. The Freudian slip. Psychoanalysis and textual criticism. London: Verso.
31. Wallerstein, R. 1998. Life inside the controversy. London: The Analytic Press.