Executing Team Plans in Dynamic, Multi-agent Domains

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-96-01, Issue , 1996, Pages 140-146

  Tambe, Milind ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COORDINATION REACTIONS; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

AGENT DOMAINS; COMBAT SIMULATION; COMPLEX DYNAMICS; DYNAMIC DOMAINS; DYNAMIC WORLD; JOINT ACTIVITY; MULTI AGENT; REAL-WORLD; SYNTHETIC ENVIRONMENTS; UNCERTAINTY;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 5644273204     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bates, J.; Loyall, A. B.; andReilly, W.S. 1992.Integrating reactivity, goals and emotionsin a broad agent. Technical Report CMU-CS-92-142, School of Computer Science, Carnegie MellonUniversity.
2. Cohen, R R., and Levesque, H. J. 1991. Teamwork.Nous 35.
3. Davis, E. 1990. Representations of commonsenseknowledge. Palo Alto, CA:MorganKaufmann.
4. Firby, J. 1987.Aninvestigation into reactive planningin complexdomains.In Proceedings of the National ConferenceonArtificial Intelligence (AAAI).
5. Grosz, B. J., and Sidner, C. L. 1990. Plans for discourse. In Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. 417-445.
6. Hayes-Roth, B.; Brownston, L.; and Gen, R.V. 1995. Multiagentcollaobration in directed improvisation. In Proceedings of the International Conferenceon Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95).
7. Huber, M., and Durfee, E. 1995. Onacting together: Without communication. In Proceedings of the AAAISpring Symposiumon Reasoning aboutMental states.
8. Ingrand, E F.; Georgeff, M. E;; and Rao, A. S. 1992. An architecture for real-time reasoning and system control. IEEE EXPERT7(6).
9. Jennings, N. 1995. Controlling cooperative problemsolving in industrial multi-agentsystemsusing joint intentions. Artificial Intelligence 75.
10. Kinny, D.; Ljungberg, M.; Rao, A.; Sonenberg, E.; Tidhard, G.; and Werner, E. 1992. Plannedteam activity. In Castelfranchi, C., and Werner, E., eds., Artificial Social Systems, Lecture notes in AI 830. Springer Verlag, New York.
11. Kitano, H.; Asada, M.; Kuniyoshi, Y.; Noda, I.; and Osawa, E. 1995. Robocup:Therobot worldcup initiative. In Proceedings of lJCAI-95 Workshopon Entertainment and AI/Alife.
12. Levesque, H. J.; Cohen, R R.; and Nunes, J. 1990. On acting together. In Proceedings of the NationalConference onArtificial lntelligence. MenloPark, Calif.: AAAI press.
13. Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: HarvardUniv. Press.
14. Pimentel, K., and Teixeira, K. 1994. Virtual reality: Throughthe newlooking glass. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Windcrest/McGraw-Hill.
15. Rosenbloom, RS.; Laird, J. E.; Newell, A.;; andMcCarl, R. 1991. Apreliminary analysis of the soar architecture as a basis for generalintelligence. Artificial Intelligence 47(1-3):289-325.
16. Searle, J. R. 1990.Collective intention andaction. Cambridge, MA:MITPress. 401-415.
17. Tambe, M., and Rosenbloom, R S. 1995. RESC: An approach for real-time, dynamicagent tracking. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
18. Tamhe, M.; Johnson, W.L.; Jones, R.; Koss, F.; Laird, J. E.; Rosenbloom, R S.; and Schwamb, K. 1995. Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments.A/Magazine16(1).
19. Tambe, M.; Schwamb, K.; and Rosenbloom, E S. 1995. Building intelligent pilots for simulated rotary wingaircraft. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conferenceon Computer GeneratedForces and Behavioral Representation.
20. Tambe, M. 1996. Tracking dynamic team activity. In Proceedings of the National Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).