A more appropriate critical appraisal of the available evidence? (multiple letters) [2]

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 2166-2167

  Zandstra, D F ^a   Van Der Voort, P H J ^b   Dellinger, R Phillip ^c   Gerlach, Herwig ^c   Carlet, Jean ^c  

^a ICU OLGV   (Netherlands)

^b ICU Medical Centre Leeuwarden   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTAMINE H2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE; RANITIDINE; SUCRALFATE;

CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LETTER; META ANALYSIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; STRESS ULCER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ANTI-ULCER AGENTS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PEPTIC ULCER; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SHOCK, SEPTIC; STRESS; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME;

EID: 5644264790     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000139624.86696.6C     Document Type: Letter

References (0)