Predictive relationships in repertory grid data: A new elaboration of Kelly's organization corollary

Journal of Constructivist Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 281-295

  Bell, Richard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5644261567     PISSN: 10720537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10720530490483194     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Bannister, D., & Mair, J. M. M. (1968). The evaluation of personal constructs. London; Academic Press.
2. Bannister, D., & Salmon, P. (1967). Measures of superordinacy. Unpublished manuscript [summarized in Fransella and Bannister, 1977, pp. 65-68.]
3. Bell, R. C. (1987). G-PACK: A computer program for the elicitation and analysis of repertory grids. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne.
4. Bell, R. C. (1988). Theory-appropriate analysis of repertory grid data. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 1, 101-118.
5. Bell, R. C. (1996). How can personal construct theory explain disorders of perception and cognition? In B.M. Walker, J. Costigan, L. L. Viney, and B. Warren (Eds.), Personal construct theory: A psychology for the future (pp. 153-171). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Australian Psychological Society.
6. Bell, R. C. (2002). GRIDSTAT: A program for analysing the data of a repertory grid. Version 2. [Computer software] Melbourne: Author.
7. Bell, R. C., Vince, J., & Costigan, J. (2002). Which vary more in repertory grid data: Constructs or elements? Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 305-314.
8. Butt, T. (1995). Ordinal relations between constructs. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8, 227-236.
9. Caputi, P., Breiger, R., & Pattison, P. (1990). Analyzing implications grids using hierarchical models. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 3, 77-90.
10. Chiari, G, Mancini, F., Nicolo, F., & Nuzzo, M. L. (1990) Hierarchical organization of personal construct systems in terms of the range of convenience. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 3, 281-311.
11. Crockett, W. H. (1982). The organization of construct systems: The organization corollary. In J. C. Mancuso and J. R. Adams-Webber (Eds.), The construing person (pp. 62-95). New York: Praeger.
12. Feixas, G., & Villegas, M. (1991). Personal construct analysis of autobiographical text: A method presentation and case illustration. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 4, 51-83.
13. Fransella, F., & Bannister, D. (1977). A manual for the repertory grid technique. London: Academic Press.
14. Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (1980). New directions in the analysis and interactive elicitation of personal construct systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 13, 81-116.
15. Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (1986). Induction of inference rules for expert systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18, 315-328.
16. Gara, M. A., & Rosenberg, S. (1979). The identification of persons as supersets and subsets in free-response personality descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2161-2170.
17. Hays, W. L. (1958). An approach to the study of trait implication and trait similarity. In R. Tagiuri and L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 289-299). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Hinkle, D. N. (1965). The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.
19. Husain, M. (1983). To what can one apply a construct? In J. R. Adams-Webber and J. C. Mancuso (Eds.), Applications of personal construct theory (pp. 11-28). Toronto: Academic Press.
20. Kelly, G. A. (1955/1991). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton. Reprinted by Routledge, London.
21. Neimeyer, R. A., Anderson, A., & Stockton, L. (2001). Snakes versus ladders: A validation of laddering technique as a measure of hierarchical structure. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14, 85-105.
22. Ryle, A. (1975). Frames and cages: The repertory grid approach to human understanding. Brighton, UK: Sussex University Press.
23. Sewell, K. W. (1997). Posttraumatic stress: Towards a constructivist model of psychotherapy. In G. J. Neimeyer and R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychology, Vol. 4 (pp. 207-235). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24. Sewell, K. W., & Williams, A .M. (2002). Broken narratives: Trauma, metaconstructive gaps, and the audience of psychotherapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 205-218.
25. Shaw, M. L. G., & Gaines, B. R. (1981). Recent advances in the analysis of a repertory grid. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 54, 307-318.
26. Slater, P. (1969). Theory and technique of the repertory grid. British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 1287-1296.
27. Smithson, M. (1987). Fuzzy set analysis for behavioral and social sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28. Ten Kate, H. (1981). A theoretical explanation of Hinkle's implication theory. In H. Bonarius, R. Holland, and S. Rosenberg (Eds.), Personal Construct Psychology (pp. 167-175). London: MacMillan.