Changing psychologists' opinions about prescriptive authority: A little information goes a long way

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 123-127

  Pimental, Patricia A ^a,e   Hoover, Marlin C ^b,d,h,i   Stout, Chris E ^c,f,g   Kamen, Gary B ^d,j,k  

^a Glen Oaks Medical Center   (United States)

^b Hoover and Associates   (United States)

^c Forest Health System Inc of IL   (United States)

^d Chicago Sch of Prof Psychology ^*

^e THE CHICAGO SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY   (United States)

^f Forest Institute   (United States)

^g HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

ⁱ SAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^k NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5644245025     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.28.2.123     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Balster, R. L. (1990). Preclinical psychopharmacology training for clinical/counseling psychologists. Psychopharmacology Newsletter, 23, 3, 5.
2. Chafetz, M. D., & Buelow, G. (1994). A training model for psychologists with prescription privileges: Clinical psychopharmacologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 149-153.
3. Cullen, E. (1993). Legal and legislative considerations of prescriptive privileges for psychologists. Washington, DC: Office of Legal and Regulatory Affairs, Practice Directorate, American Psychological Association.
4. DeLeon, P. (1992). Prescribing privileges: An evolving consensus. The Independent Practitioner, 12, 169-171.
5. DeLeon, P., & Wiggins, J. (1996). Prescription privileges for psychologists. American Psychologist, 51, 225-229.
6. Fox, R. E. (1992, August). Prescription privileges - Good idea or bad idea? Paper presented at Division 42 Conversation Hour of the 100th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
7. Fox, R. E., Schwelitz, F. D., & Barclay, A. G. (1992). A proposed curriculum for psychopharmacology training for professional psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 216-219.
8. Marra, T. (1994, February 20). Should clinical psychologists have prescription privileges in California? Psychiatric Times, 3, 20.
9. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. (1991). XIX: Prescribing authority. In 1991 NABP Survey of Pharmacy Law (pp. 46-50). Washington, DC: Author.
10. Optometric Financial Office. (1994). Responses to General Survey Part II.A. Annual Optometric Council national captitol review (Issue No. 127). Santa Ana, CA: Optometric Program Foundation.
11. Wright, R. (1995, summer). Psychiatry wages all-out war on psychologists' prescriptive demonstration project. Advance, 1, 9, 12-15, 18, 20.