Evaluating alternative estimators of fishery management reference points

Fisheries Research

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 290-303

  Haltuch, Melissa A ^a,b   Punt, André E ^b   Dorn, Martin W ^c  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomass reference points; Estimators; Groundfish; Simulation

Indexed keywords

PLEURONECTIFORMES; REXEA SOLANDRI;

EID: 56349168951     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brodziak J.K.T., Overholtz W.J., and Rago P.J. Does spawning stock affect recruitment of New England groundfish?. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58 (2001) 306-318
2. Burnham K.P., and Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach (2000), Springer-Verlag, New York
3. Clark, W.G., 1993. The effect of recruitment variability on the choice of a target level of spawning biomass per recruit. In: Kruse, G., Eggers, D.M., Marasco, R.J., Pautzke, C., Quinn II, T.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Management Strategies for Exploited Fish Populations. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report No. 93-02. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, pp. 233-246.
4. Dichmont C.M., Deng A., Punt A.E., Venables W., and Haddon M. Management strategies for short-lived species: the case of Australia's northern prawn fishery. 3. Factors affecting management and estimation performance. Fish. Res. 82 (2006) 235-245
5. Dorn, M.W., Aydin, K., Barbeaux, S., Guttormsen, M., Megrey, B., Spalinger, K., Wilkins, M., 2006. Assessment of walleye pollock in the Gulf of Alaska. In: 2006 North Pacific Marine Fishery Council Gulf of Alaska Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Reports for 2007. North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W 4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501, USA, pp. 39-146 (Chapter 1).
6. Helser T.E., Fleischer G.W., Martell S., and Taylor N. Stock Assessment of Pacific Hake (whiting) in U.S and Canadian Waters in 2004 (2005), Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97220, USA
7. Ianelli J.N. Simulation analyses testing the robustness of productivity determinations from west coast Pacific Ocean perch stock assessment data. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 22 (2002) 301-310
8. IPCC. In: Houghton J.T., Ding Y., Griggs D.J., Noguer M., van der Linden P.J., and Xiaosu D. (Eds). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (2001), Cambridge University Press pp. 527-578
9. Lai H.-L., Haltuch M.A., and Punt A.E. Stock assessment of petrale sole: 2004. Status of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Through 2005, Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation: Stock Assessments and Rebuilding Analyses vol. 1 (2005), Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 100, Portland, OR 97220, USA
10. MacCall A.D., Klingbeil R.A., and Methot R.D. Recent increased abundance and potential productivity of Pacific mackerel (Scomber japonicus). CalCOFI Rep. 26 (1985) 119-129
11. Methot R.D., and Stewart I.J. Status of U.S. canary rockfish resource in 2005. Status of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Through 2005, Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation: Stock Assessments and Rebuilding Analyses vol. 1 (2005), Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201
12. Myers R.A., Rosenberg A.A., Mace P.M., Barrowman N., and Restrepo V.R. In search of thresholds for recruitment overfishing. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 51 2 (1994) 191-205
13. NEFMC (New England Fishery Management Council), 2003. Final amendment 13 to the northeast multispecies fishery management plan including a final supplemental environmental impact statement and an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
14. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), 2002. Final report of the working group on re-evaluation of biological reference points for New England groundfish. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
15. NPFMC (North Pacific Fishery Management Council), 2006. Fishery management plan for groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area. North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W 4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501, USA.
16. PFMC (Pacific Fishery Management Council), 1998. Final environmental assessment/regulatory impact review for amendment 11 to the Pacific coast groundfish fishery management plan. Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
17. PFMC (Pacific Fishery Management Council), 2002. Scientific and statistical committee report on rebuilding analyses for bocaccio, canary rockfish, yelloweye rockfish, widow rockfish, and whiting. In: Pacific Fishery Management Council: Status of the Pacific Groundfish Fishery Through 2002 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation, vol. I. Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
18. PFMC (Pacific Fishery Management Council), 2006. Pacific coast groundfish fishery management plan for the California, Oregon and Washington groundfish fishery as amended through Amendment 19. Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97220, USA.
19. Punt A.E. Evaluating the efficacy of managing West Coast groundfish resources through simulations. Fish. Bull. 101 (2003) 860-873
20. Punt A.E. The performance of a size-structured stock assessment method in the fact of spatial heterogeneity in growth. Fish. Res. 65 (2003) 391-409
21. Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M., and Cui G.R. Evaluation of management tools for Australia's south east fishery. 2. How well can management quantities be estimated?. Mar. Fresh. Res. 53 (2002) 631-644
22. Quinn T.J., and Deriso R.B. Quantitative Fish Dynamics (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
23. Restrepo V.R., and Powers J.E. Precautionary control rules in US fisheries management: specification and performance. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56 (1999) 846-852
24. Restrepo, V.R., Thompson, G.G., Mace, P.M., Gabriel, W.L., Low, L.L., MacCall, A.D., Methot, R.D., Powers, J.E., Taylor, B.L., Wade, P.R., Witzig, J.F., 1998. Technical guidance on the use of precautionary approaches to implementing national standard 1 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. NOAA Tech. Memo NMFS-F/SPO-31.
25. Sampson D.B., and Lee Y.W. An assessment of the stocks of petrale sole off Washington, Oregon and northern California in 1998. Status of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Through 1998 and Recommended Biological Catches for 1994: Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (1999), Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201
26. Sibert J., Hampton J., Kleiber P., and Maunder M. Biomass, size, and trophic status of top predators in the Pacific Ocean. Science 314 (2006) 1773-1776
27. Wilberg M.J., and Bence J.R. Performance of time-varying catchability estimators in statistical catch-at-age analysis. Can. J. Aquat. Fish. Sci. 63 (2006) 2275-2285
28. Yin Y., and Sampson D.B. Bias and precision of estimates from an age-structured stock assessment program in relation to stock and data characteristics. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 24 (2004) 865-879