Structural variants of biodegradable polyesterurethane in vivo evoke a cellular and angiogenic response that is dictated by architecture

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 29-42

  Henry, Jerome A ^a   Burugapalli, Krishna ^a   Neuenschwander, Peter ^b   Pandit, Abhay ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Polyesterurethane; Scaffold; Tissue response

Indexed keywords

CROSSLINKING; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE;

CELLULARS; IN-VIVO; NON-POROUS FILMS; POLYESTERURETHANES; POROUS MEMBRANES; POROUS MESHES; POROUS SCAFFOLD; SYNTHESISED; TISSUE RESPONSE; VIVO TISSUE;

CELL CULTURE;

CD31 ANTIGEN; COLLAGEN; EOSIN; GLUTARALDEHYDE; HEMATOXYLIN; POLYETHERURETHAN;

ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL VOLUME; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; FIBROBLAST; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATORY CELL; NONHUMAN; PERICARDIUM; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RABBIT; STEREOMETRY; SYNTHESIS; TISSUE REACTION; VASCULARIZATION;

BOVINAE; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 56349149404     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Guan J., Sacks M.S., Beckman E.J., and Wagner W.R. Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of elastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester-urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine. J Biomed Mater Res 61 (2002) 493-503
2. Riboldi S.A., Sampaolesi M., Neuenschwander P., Cossu G., and Mantero S. Electrospun degradable polyesterurethane membranes: potential scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 4606-4615
3. Wang J.H., Yao C.H., Chuang W.Y., and Young T.H. Development of biodegradable polyesterurethane membranes with different surface morphologies for the culture of osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 51 (2000) 761-770
4. Laeschke K. Biocompatibility of microparticles into soft tissue fillers. Semin Cutan Med Surg 23 (2004) 214-217
5. Salthouse T.N. Some aspects of macrophage behavior at the implant interface. J Biomed Mater Res 18 (1984) 395-401
6. Shun C.T., and Young T.H. The effect of surface properties of EVAL membranes on the inflammatory response. Mater Sci Eng C 13 (2000) 75-83
7. Sanders J.E., Bale S.D., and Neumann T. Tissue response to microfibers of different polymers: polyester, polyethylene, polylactic acid, and polyurethane. J Biomed Mater Res 62 (2002) 222-227
8. Sanders J.E., Lamont S.E., Karchin A., Golledge S.L., and Ratner B.D. Fibro-porous meshes made from polyurethane micro-fibers: effects of surface charge on tissue response. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 813-818
9. Sanders J.E., Lamont S.E., Mitchell S.B., and Malcolm S.G. Small fiber diameter fibro-porous meshes: tissue response sensitivity to fiber spacing. J Biomed Mater Res 72A (2005) 335-342
10. Kylma J., and Seppälä J.V. Synthesis and characterization of a biodegradable thermoplastic poly(ester-urethane) elastomer. Macromolecules 30 (1997) 2876-2882
11. Saad B., Hirt T.D., Welti M., Uhlschmid G.K., Neuenschwander P., and Suter U.W. Development of degradable polyesterurethanes for medical applications: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. J Biomed Mater Res 36 (1997) 65-74
12. Saad B., Ciardelli G., Matter S., Welti M., Uhlschmid G.K., Neuenschwander P., et al. Characterization of the cell response of cultured macrophages and fibroblasts to particles of short-chain poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyric acid]. J Biomed Mater Res 30 (1996) 429-439
13. Henry J.A., Simonet M., Pandit A., and Neuenschwander P. Characterization of a slowly degrading biodegradable polyester-urethane for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 82A (2007) 669-679
14. Saad B., Keiser O.M., Welti M., Uhlschmid G.K., Neuenschwander P., and Suter U.W. Multiblock copolyesters as biomaterials: in vitro biocompatibility testing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 8 (1997) 497-505
15. Saad B., Neuenschwander P., Uhlschmid G.K., and Suter U.W. New versatile, elastomeric, degradable polymeric materials for medicine. Int J Biol Macromol 25 (1999) 293-301
16. Walles T., Herden T., Haverich A., and Mertsching H. Influence of scaffold thickness and scaffold composition on bioartificial graft survival. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 1233-1239
17. Henno S., Lambotte J.C., Glez D., Guigand M., Lancien G., and Cathelineau G. Characterisation and quantification of angiogenesis in beta-tricalcium phosphate implants by immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 3173-3181
18. Cuttle L., Nataatmadja M., Fraser J.F., Kempf M., Kimble R.M., and Hayes M.T. Collagen in the scarless fetal skin wound: detection with picrosirius-polarization. Wound Repair Regen 13 (2005) 198-204
19. Madibally S.V., Solomon V., Mitchell R.N., Van De Water L., Yarmush M.L., and Toner M. Influence of insulin therapy on burn wound healing in rats. J Surg Res 109 (2003) 92-100
20. Zhang H., Sun L., Wang W., and Ma X. Quantitative analysis of fibrosis formation on the microcapsule surface with the use of picro-sirius red staining, polarized light microscopy, and digital image analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 76A (2006) 120-125
21. Breen A.M., Dockery P., O'Brien T., and Pandit A.S. The use of therapeutic gene eNOS delivered via a fibrin scaffold enhances wound healing in a compromised wound model. Biomaterials 29 (2008) 3143-3151
22. Garcia Y., Breen A., Burugapalli K., Dockery P., and Pandit A. Stereological methods to assess tissue response for tissue-engineered scaffolds. Biomaterials 28 (2007) 175-186
23. Lossing C., and Hansson H.A. Peptide growth factors and myofibroblasts in capsules around human breast implants. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 91 (1993) 1277-1286
24. Bader R., Mittelmeier W., Zeiler G., Tokar I., Steinhauser E., and Schuh A. Pitfalls in the use of acetabular reinforcement rings in total hip revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125 (2005) 558-563
25. Davies A.P., Willert H.G., Campbell P.A., Learmonth I.D., and Case C.P. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 18-27
26. Kivalo M., Siren V., Raitta C., and Immonen I. Biodegradable tube implants in experimental glaucoma surgery in the rabbit. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10 (1999) 53-58
27. Chen H.C., and Ahmed J. Design and testing of a fluorescence glucose sensor which incorporates a bioinductive material. Biomed Sci Instrum 40 (2004) 149-154
28. Schumpelick V., Conze J., and Klinge U. Preperitoneal mesh-plasty in incisional hernia repair. A comparative retrospective study of 272 operated incisional hernias. Chirurg 67 (1996) 1028-1035
29. Smith H.J., Fearnot N.E., Byrd C.L., Wilkoff B.L., Love C.J., and Sellers T.D. Five-years experience with intravascular lead extraction. U.S. lead extraction database. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17 (1994) 2016-2020
30. Bullaboy C.A. Bovine pericardium: another cautionary note. Ann Thorac Surg 48 (1989) 743
31. Dahn M., Lyman W.D., Schwell A.B., Factor S.M., and Frater R.W. Immunogenicity of glutaraldehyde-tanned bovine pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99 (1990) 1082-1090
32. Grabenwoger M., Sider J., Fitzal F., Zelenka C., Windberger U., and Grimm M. Impact of glutaraldehyde on calcification of pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve material. Ann Thorac Surg 62 (1996) 772-777
33. Human P., and Zilla P. Characterization of the immune response to valve bioprostheses and its role in primary tissue failure. Ann Thorac Surg 71 (2001) S385-S388
34. Borkenhagen M., Stoll R.C., Neuenschwander P., Suter U.W., and Aebischer P. In vivo performance of a new biodegradable polyesterurethane system used as a nerve guidance channel. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 2155-2165
35. Saad B., Kuboki Y., Welti M., Uhlschmid G.K., Neuenschwander P., and Suter U.W. DegraPol-foam: degradable and highly porous polyesterurethane foam as a new substrate for bone formation. Artif Org 24 (2000) 939-945
36. Woodward S. Evaluation by light microscopy. In: Von Recum A., and Jacobi J.E. (Eds). Handbook of biomaterials evaluation: scientific technical and clinical testing of implant materials. 2nd ed. (1999), Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia 613
37. van Tienen T., Heijkants R.G., de Groot J.H., Schouten A.J., Pennings A.J., Veth R.P., et al. Meniscal replacement in dogs. Tissue regeneration in two different materials with similar properties. J Biomed Mater Res 76B (2006) 389-396
38. Abe R., Donnelly S.C., Peng T., Bucala R., and Metz C.N. Peripheral blood fibrocytes: differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites. J Immunol 166 (2001) 7556-7562
39. Bucala R., Spiegel L.A., Chesney J., Hogan M., and Cerami A. Circulating fibrocytes define a new leukocyte subpopulation that mediates tissue repair. Mol Med 1 (1994) 71-81
40. Quan T.E., Cowper S., Wu S.P., Bockenstedt L.K., and Bucala R. Circulating fibrocytes: collagen-secreting cells of the peripheral blood. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36 (2004) 598-606
41. Takeshita F., Morimoto K., and Suetsugu T. Tissue reaction to alumina implants inserted into the tibiae of rats. J Biomed Mater Res 27 (1993) 421-428
42. Therin M., Christel P., and Meunier A. Analysis of the general features of the soft tissue response to some metals and ceramics using quantitative histomorphometry. J Biomed Mater Res 28 (1994) 1267-1276
43. Ye Q., Ohsaki K., Ii K., Li D.J., Zhu C.S., Yamashita Y., et al. Subcutaneous inflammatory reaction to a synthetic auditory ossicle (Bioceram) in rats. Acta Otolaryngol 119 (1999) 83-88
44. Hartlapp I., Abe R., Saeed R.W., Peng T., Voelter W., Bucala R., et al. Fibrocytes induce an angiogenic phenotype in cultured endothelial cells and promote angiogenesis in vivo. FASEB J 15 (2001) 2215-2224
45. van Tienen T.G., Heijkants R.G.J.C., Buma P., de Groot J.H., Pennings A.J., and Veth R.P.H. Tissue ingrowth and degradation of two biodegradable porous polymers with different porosities and pore sizes. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 1731-1738