Retraction notice to “Long-Term Trends (1986-2003)in the Use of Coronary Reperfusion Strategies in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction in Central Massachusetts” [Int. J Cardiol. 131 (2008) (83-89)] (S0167527307019390) (10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.10.048));Long-term trends (1986-2003) in the use of coronary reperfusion strategies in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in Central Massachusetts

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 83-89

  Goldberg, Robert J ^a   Spencer, Frederick A ^a   Okolo, Joseph ^a   Lessard, Darleen ^a   Yarzebski, Jorge ^a   Gore, Joel M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Coronary reperfusion strategies; Treatment practices

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOT LYSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 56349148242     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: 18741754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.065     Document Type: Erratum

References (22)

1. Ryan T.J., Anderson J.L., Antman E.M., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 28 (1996) 1328-1428
2. Ryan T.J., Antman E.M., Brooks N.H., et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction; executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 100 (1999) 1016-1030
3. Goldberg R.J., and Gurwitz J.H. Disseminating the results of clinical trials to community-based practitioners: is anyone listening?. Am Heart J 137 (1999) 4-7
4. McLaughlin T.J., Soumerai S.B., Willison D.J., et al. Adherence to national guidelines for drug treatment of suspected acute myocardial infarction: evidence for undertreatment in women and the elderly. Arch Intern Med 156 (1996) 799-805
5. Krumholz H.M., Radford M.J., Wang Y., Chen J., Heiat A., and Marciniak T.A. National use and effectiveness of beta-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction. National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 280 (1998) 623-629
6. Spencer F., Scleparis G., Goldberg R.J., Yarzebski J., Lessard D., and Gore J.M. Decade long trends (1986 to 1997) in the medical management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. Am Heart J 142 (2001) 594-603
7. Goldberg R.J., Gore J.M., Alpert J.S., and Dalen J.E. Recent changes in the attack rates and survival rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975-1981); The Worcester Heart Attack Study. JAMA 255 (1986) 2774-2779
8. Goldberg R.J., Gore J.M., Albert J.S., and Dalen J.E. Incidence and case fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975-1984): The Worcester Heart Attack Study. Am Heart J 115 (1988) 761-767
9. Goldberg R.J., Yarzebski J., Lessard D., and Gore J.M. A two-decades (1975-1995) long experience in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case-fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 33 (1999) 1533-1539
10. Goldberg R.J., Spencer F.A., Yarzebski J., et al. A 25-year perspective into the changing landscape of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (the Worcester Heart Attack Study). Am J Cardiol 94 (2004) 1373-1378
11. Menon V., Harrington R.A., Hochman J.S., et al. Thrombolysis and adjunctive therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 126, supplement (2004) 549s-575s
12. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Morbidity and mortality: 2004 chartbook on cardiovascular, lung, and blood diseases. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health. 2004.
13. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics (2005) Update
14. McGovern P.G., Jacobs Jr. D.R., Shahar E., et al. Trends in acute coronary heart disease mortality, morbidity, and medical care from 1985 through 1997. The Minnesota Heart Survey. Circulation 104 (2001) 19-24
15. Rogers W.J., Canto J.G., Lambrew C.T., et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the U.S. from 1990 through 1999; the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, 1 2, and 2. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (2000) 2056-2063
16. Eagle K.A., Goodman S.G., Avezum A.A., et al. on behalf of the GRACE Investigators. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Lancet 359 (2002) 373-377
17. Hasdai D., Behar S., Wallentin L., et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. The Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS). Eur Heart J 23 (2002) 1190-1201
18. Fox K.A., Cokkinos D.V., Deckers J., Keil U., Maggioni A., and Steg G. The ENACT study: a pan-European survey of acute coronary syndromes. European Network for Acute Coronary Treatment. Eur Heart J 21 (2000) 1440-1449
19. Zahn R., Schiele R., Schneider S., et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty? Results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and the Myocardial Infraction Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 (2001) 1827-1835
20. Dzavik V. New frontiers and unresolved controversies in percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 91 (2003) 27A-33A
21. Pilote L., Califf R.M., Sapp S., et al. Regional variation across the United States in the management of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 333 (1995) 565-572
22. Krumholz H.M., Chen J., Rathore S.S., Wang Y., and Radford M.J. Regional variation in the treatment and outcomes of myocardial infarction: investigating New England's advantage. Am Heart J 146 (2003) 242-249