A clash of cultures: Improving the "fit" between evaluative independence and the political requirements of a democratic society

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 400-415

  Chelimsky, Eleanor ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56349117245     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214008324465     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Blackstone, T., & Plowden, W. (1988). Inside the think tank: Advising the Cabinet 1971-1983. London: William Heinemann.
2. Ellis, J.J. (2002). Founding brothers: The revolutionary generation. New York: Random House.
3. Evans, H. (2006, June 18). Eye on the times. New York Times Book Review, p. 16.
4. Madison, J. (2001). The Federalist No. 51: The structure of the government must furnish the proper checks and balances between the different departments. In Selected Federalist Papers (pp. 120-122). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1788)
5. Malignant reporting. (1987). Public Interest, No. 88, pp. 149-151.
6. Nordhaus, W.D. (2004, January 15). The story of a bubble. New York Review of Books, p. 34.
7. Padover, S. V. (Ed.). (1946). Thomas Jefferson on democracy. New York: New American Library of World Literature, Mentor Books.
8. Suleiman, J. (2006, July 4). Freedom of Information Act turns 40 today. D.C. Examiner, p. 1.
9. Thomas, L. (1982, May 30). Things unflattened by science. Commencement Address at Williams College.
10. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Program Evaluation and Methodology. (1984). WIC evaluations provide some favorable but no conclusive evidence on the effects expected for the special supplemental program for Women, Infants, and Children (USGAO/PEMD Report 84-4). Washington, DC: Author.
11. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Program Evaluation and Methodology. (1988a). Enterprise Zones: Lessons from the Maryland experience (USGAO/PEMD Report 89-2). Washington, DC: Author.
12. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Program Evaluation and Methodology. (1988b). Weapons testing: Quality of DOD operational testing and reporting (USGAO/PEMD Report 88-32 BR). Washington, DC: Author.