Bioethical analysis of the results: How well do laws and regulations address people's concerns?

The Ethics and Governance of Human Genetic Databases: European Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 249-256

  Häyry, Matti ^a   Takala, Tuija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56349107031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511611087.027     Document Type: Chapter

References (6)

1. Matti Ha¨yry, ‘Can Arguments Address Concerns?’, Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005), pp. 598–600.
2. Ku¨ lliki Korts, Sue Weldon and Margre´t Lilja Gudmundsdo´ ttir, ‘Genetic Databases and Public Attitudes: A Comparison of Iceland, Estonia and the UK’, Trames 8 (2004), pp. 131–149
3. Ku¨ lliki Korts, ‘Introducing Gene Technology to the Society: Social Implications of the Estonian Genome Project’, Trames 8 (2004), pp. 241–253;
4. Mairi Levitt and Sue Weldon, ‘Genetic Databases and Public Trust’, in Gardar Arnason, Salvo¨ r Nordal and Vilhja´lmur A´ rnason (eds.), Blood and Data: Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases (Reykjavı´k: University of Iceland Press and Centre for Ethics, 2004), pp. 175–179;
5. Jane Kaye, Ho¨rdur Helgi Helgason, Ants No˜mper, Tarmo Sild and Lotta Wendel, ‘Population Genetic Databases: A Comparative Analysis of the Law in Iceland, Sweden, Estonia and the UK’, Trames 8 (2004), pp. 15–33;
6. Ants Nomper, ‘What is Wrong with Using Anonymized Data and Tissue for Research Purposes?’, in A´ rnason, Nordal and Arnason, Blood and Data, pp. 121–126;