Acceptance by knowing? The social context of urban riparian buffers as a stormwater best management practice

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 908-920

  Wagner, Mimi M ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BMPs; NPDES; Riparian buffers; Social dynamics; Urban watershed

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; RIPARIAN ZONE; RUNOFF; STAKEHOLDER; STORMWATER; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 56349087475     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920802183339     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Asakawa, S., Yoshida, K. and Yabe, K. (2004) Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape Urban Plan., 68, pp. 167-182.
2. Bernard, H. R. (2006) Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches,, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
3. Brinson, M. M., Swift, B. L., Plantico, R. C. and Barclay, J. S. (1981) Riparian ecosystems: Their ecology and status, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Sciences Program., FWS/OBS-81/17. Washington, DC
4. Curtis, A. and Robertson, A. (2003) Understanding landholder management of river frontages: The Goulburn Broken. Ecol. Manage. Restoration, 4:1, pp. 45-54.
5. Dillman, D. A. (2000) Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method,, John Wiley and Sons, New York
6. Fennessy, M. S. and Cronk, J. K. (1997) The effectiveness and restoration potential of riparian ecotones for the management of nonpoint source pollution, particularly nitrate. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 27:4, pp. 285-317.
7. Fischer, R. A., Martin, C. O., Ratti, J. T. and Guidice, J. (2001) Riparian terminology: Confusion and clarification, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers., TN-EMRRP-SR-25. Engineer Research and Development Center. Washington, DC
8. Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A. and Cummins, K. W. (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience, 41:8, pp. 540-551.
9. Groffman, P. M., Bain, D. J., Band, L. E., Belt, K. T., Brush, G. S. and Grove, J. M. (2003) Down by the riverside: Urban riparian ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ., 1:6, pp. 315-321.
10. Harper, D. (1986) Meaning and work: A study of photo elicitation. Curr. Sociol., 34:3, pp. 24-46.
11. Kaplan, S. and Kaplan, R. (1982) Humanscape: Environments for people, Ulrich's Books, Ann Arbor, MI
12. Kent, R. (2001) Data construction and data analysis for survey research, Palgrave, New York
13. Lee, K. H., Isenhart, T. M. and Schultz, R. C. (2003) Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J. Soil Water Conserv., 58:1, pp. 1-8.
14. Lovell, S. T. and Sullivan, W. C. (2006) Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: Evidence, promise, and open questions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 112, pp. 249-260.
15. Mayer, P. M., Reynolds, S. K., McCutchen, M. D. and Canfield, T. J. (2006) Riparian buffer width, vegetative cover, and nitrogen removal effectiveness: A review of current science and regulations, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency., EPA/600/R-05/118. Cincinnati, OH
16. Naiman, R. T. and Pollock, M. (1993) The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol. Appl., 3:2, pp. 209-212.
17. Nassauer, J. (1989) Agricultural policy and aesthetic objectives. J. Soil Water Conserv., 44:5, pp. 384-387.
18. Nassauer, J. I., Kosek, S. E. and Corry, R. C. (2001) Meeting public expectations with ecological innovation in riparian landscapes. J. Am. Water Resources Assoc., 37:6, pp. 1439-1443.
19. (2002) Riparian areas: Functions and strategies for management, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
20. Rauch, W., Seggelke, K., Brown, R. and Krebs, P. (2005) Integrated approaches in urban storm drainage: Where do we stand?. Environ. Manage., 35:4, pp. 396-409.
21. Russell, B. H. (2006) Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative, AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD
22. Ryan, R. (1998) Local perceptions and values for a Midwestern river corridor. Landscape Urban Plan., 42, pp. 225-237.
23. Simcox, D. E. and Zube, E. H. (1989) Public value orientations toward urban riparian landscapes. Society Nat. Resources, 2:3, pp. 229-239.
24. Stake, R. (2000) Handbook of qualitative research,, pp. 435-454. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
25. Stein, T. V., Anderson, D. H. and Kelly, T. (1999) Using stakeholders' values to apply ecosystem management in an upper midwest landscape. Environ. Manage., 24:3, pp. 399-413.
26. Stewart, S., Gemmill, E. and Pentz, N. (2006) An evaluation of the functions and effectiveness of urban riparian forest buffers, Water Environment Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA
27. Stone, K. C., Hunt, P. G., Novak, J. M., Johnson, M. H., Watts, D. W. and Humenik, F. J. (2004) Stream nitrogen changes in an eastern coastal plain watershed. J. Soil Water Conserv., 59:2, pp. 66-72.
28. Sullivan, W. C., Anderson, O. M. and Lovell, S. T. (2004) Agricultural buffers at the rural-urban fringe: An examination of approval by farmers, residents, academics in the Midwestern United States. Landscape Urban Plan., 69, pp. 299-313.
29. Urban, M. (2005) Values and ethical beliefs regarding agricultural drainage in central Illinois, USA. Society Nat. Resources, 18, pp. 173-189.
30. (2000)
31. (2000) Conservation buffers to reduce pesticide losses, USDA, Washington, DC
32. Verry, E. S., Dolloff, C. A. and Manning, M. E. (2004) Riparian ecotone: A functional definition and delineation for resource assessment. Water Air Soil Pollut. Focus, 4, pp. 67-94.
33. Willard, D., Finn, V., Levine, D. and Klarquist, J. (1990) Wetland creation and restoration: The status of science, pp. 327-337. Island Press, Washington, DC