Challenges for the maintenance of traditional knowledge in the Satoyama and Satoumi ecosystems, Noto Peninsula, Japan

Human Ecology Review

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-40

  Cetinkaya, Gulay ^a,b  

^a UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Japan; Noto Peninsula; Satoumi; Satoyama; Traditional knowledge

Indexed keywords

BASIDIOMYCOTA;

EID: 56249140045     PISSN: 10744827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alexander, M., K. Chamundeeswari, A. Kambu, M. Ruiz, and B. Tobin. 2004. The Role of Registers & Databases in the Protection of Traditional Knowledge-A Comparative Analysis. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) report.
2. Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management Systems. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
3. Berkes, F. 2000. Cross-scale institutional linkages: Perspectives from the bottom up. IASCP 2000 Conference, Indiana University, June 2000. Available online at http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00000217/00/ berkesf041200.pdf.
4. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10, 5, 1251-1262.
5. Berkes, F. 2001. Religious traditions. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Volume 3.
6. Berkes, F. and C. Folke. 2002. Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In L.H. Gunderson and C.S. Holling (eds.), Panarchy-Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. London: Island Press.
7. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke (eds.). 2003. Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bhatti, S.T. 2004. The work and role of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). In S. Twarog and P. Kapoor (eds.), The United Nation Conference on Trade and Development: Protection and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
9. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Available online at http://www.biodiv.org/programmes/socio-eco/traditional/default.html.
10. Colding, J. and C. Folke. 2001. Social taboos: "Invisible" systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological applications 11, 2, 584-600.
11. Cristancho, S. and J. Vining. 2004. Reciprocity as principled argument: The ethics of human-nature interactions for the Letuama. Human Ecology Review 11, 1, 36-49.
12. Cunningham, A.B. 2001. Applied Ethnobotany: People, Wild Plant Use, and Conservation. London, UK: Earthscan.
13. DeWalt, B.R. 1994. Using indigenous knowledge to improve agriculture and natural resource management. Human organization 53, 123-131.
14. Davidson-Hunt, I.J and F. Berkes. 2001. Changing Resource Management Paradigms, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and Non-timber Forest Products. Forest communities in the third millennium: Linking research, business, and policy toward a sustainable non-timber forest product sector, proceedings of meeting held October 1-4, 1999, Kenora, Ontario, Canada. Available online at http://www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc217.pdf.
15. Feyerabend, P. 1987. Farewell to Reason. London, UK: Verso.
16. Folke, C., F. Berkes and J. Colding. 1998. Ecological practices and social mechanisms for building resilience and sustainability. In F. Berkes and C. Folke (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, 414-436. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
17. Folke, C. 2004. Traditional knowledge in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9, 3, 7. Available online at http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art7/.
18. Fukamachi, K., H. Oku, and T. Nakashizuka. 2001. The change of a Satoyama landscape and its causality in Kamiseya, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan between 1970 and 1995. Landscape ecology 16, 703-717.
19. Garibaldi, A. and N. Turner. 2004. Cultural keystone species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9, 3, 1. Available online at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/ iss3/art1.
20. Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling (eds). 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
21. Johnson, B.L. 1999. The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies. Conservation Ecology 3, 8. Available online at www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art8.
22. Ishikawa in Statistics. 2005. Available online at http://info.jmc.or.jp/. (In Japanese).
23. Ishikawa Prefecture. 1952, 1962, 1972, 1982, 1992. 2002. Ishikawa Prefecture 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 statistical data (In Japanese).
24. Kiene, T. 2006. Traditional knowledge in the European context. Ressources na Naturelles. No.2.
25. Kirikiri, R. and G. Nugent. 1995. Harvesting of New Zealand native birds by Maori. In G.C. Grigg, P.T. Hale and D. Lunney (eds), Conservation through Sustainable Use of Wildlife, 54-59. Center for Conservation Biology, University of Queensland: Brisbane, Australia.
26. Laccarino, M. 2003. Science and Culture. EMBO Rep 4, 220-223.
27. Law for the Promotion of Nature Restoration. 2003. Available online at http://www.env.go.jp/en/nature/npr/fcpn/parts/08.pdf.
28. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press: Washington, DC.
29. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystem and Human Well-being: Policy Responses. Volume 3. Available online at http://www. millenniumassessment.org/en/Responses.aspx.
30. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery. 1998. The report submitted to the Prime Minister by the Investigative Council on Basic Problems Concerning Food, Agriculture, and Rural Areas. Available online at http://www.maff.go.jp/ ekihon/main.pdf.
31. Ministry of the Environment. 2002. Development of the National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan (Revised in 2002) (The "New Biodiversity Strategy"). Unedited Tentative Translation. Available online at http://www.env.go.jp/en/nature/biodiv/nsj/2002/outline.pdf.
32. Ministry of the Environment. 2005. Conservation and Restoration of Diverse Natural Environment, [online] URL: http://www.env.go.jp/en/nature/ npr/fcpn/parts/08.pdf [cited 2007 Apr 14].
33. Moller, N., F. Berkes, P. O'Brian Lyver and M. Kislalioglu. 2004. Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: Monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and Society 9, 3, 2. Available online at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2/.
34. Nakashima, D.J. and M. Roué. 2002. Indigenous knowledge, peoples and sustainable practice. In P. Timmerman (ed), Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change: Social and Economic Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, 314-324. UK.
35. Nakagoshi, N. and S. Hong. 2001. Vegetation and landscape of East Asian "Satoyama". Global Environmental Resources 5, 2, 171-181.
36. National Biodiversity Strategy. 2002. Development of the 'New National Biodiversity Strategy' of Japan. Revised in 2002. Unedited Tentative Translation. Available online at http://www.biodic.go.jp/cbd/outline/rev- unedited.pdf.
37. Neumann, K., B. Tobin, C.S. Wright. 2004. The Central Asia and Mongolia bioresources and biosecurity network. Capacity Development on Access to Genetic Resources, Benefit Sharing, and Biosafety in Central Asia and Mongolia. United Nation.
38. Takeuchi, K. 2001. Nature conservation strategies for the "SATOYAMA" and SATOCHI", Habitats for secondary nature in Japan. Global Environmental Resources 5, 2, 193-198.
39. Takeuchi, K., R.D. Brown, I. Washitani, A. Tsunekawa, M. Yokohari (eds.). 2001. Satoyama: The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
40. Ticktin, T. and T. Johns. 2002. Chinanteco management of Aechmea magdalenae: Implications for the use of TK and TRM in management plans. Economic Botany 56, 117-191.
41. Twarog, S. 2004. Preserving, protection and promoting traditional knowledge: National actions and international dimensions. In S. Twarog and P. Kapoor (eds.), The United Nation Conference on Trade and Development: Protection and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
42. United Nations University (UNU). 2007. Workshop on Sub-global Assessment of Satoyama and Satoumi in Japan. Available online at http://www.ias.unu.edu/ sub_page.aspx?catID=8&ddlID=372.
43. UNESCO/Links brochure. 2002. Available online at http://portal.unesco. org/sc_nat/ev.php?URL_ID=3541&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION= 201&reload=1084895938.
44. Washitani, I. 2001. Traditional sustainable ecosystem "Satoyama" and biodiversity crisis in Japan: Conservation ecological perspective. Global Environmental Resources 5, 2, 119-133. Available online at http://www.airies.or.jp/publication/ger/pdf/05-2-02.pdf.
45. World Conservation Union. 1986. Tradition, conservation and development. Occasional Newsletter of the Commission on Ecology's Working Group on Traditional Ecological Knowledge No. 4. Gland, Switzerland.
46. Yamamoto, S. 1999. Studies on the Effect of Changes in Rural Landscape Structure on Secondary Forest Plants in Japanese Rural Areas. Abstract of the Doctoral Dissertation. Available online at http://www.es.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ lep/thesis/99D_yamamoto-e.html.
47. Yanagi, T. 2006. Satoumi-Ron "The Argument of Satoumi." Kouseisya Kouseikaku, Tokyo, 102 (in Japanese).