Bond graph modeling of a railway truck on curved track

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 22-34

  Banerjee, N ^a   Saha, A K ^a   Karmakar, R ^b   Bhattacharyya, R ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Bond graph; Conicity; Primary suspension; Rail vehicle; Truck

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILES; GRAPH THEORY; RAIL MOTOR CARS; RAILS; VEHICLES;

BOND GRAPH; BOND GRAPH MODELS; BOND GRAPHS; CONICITY; CONTACT SURFACES; CREEP FORCES; CRITICAL SPEEDS; CURVED TRACKS; DEGREE OF FREEDOMS; DYNAMICAL BEHAVIORS; KINEMATIC NONLINEARITIES; PRIMARY SUSPENSION; RAIL VEHICLE; RAIL VEHICLES; SIMPLIFYING ASSUMPTIONS; WHEEL CONTACTS;

TRUCKS;

EID: 56249126397     PISSN: 1569190X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2008.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hobbs A.E.W., and Pearce T.G. The lateral dynamics of the linear induction motor test vehicles. J. Dyn. Syst. Measur. Contr. (1974) 147-157
2. Wickens A.H. General aspect of the lateral dynamics of railway vehicles. J. Eng. Ind. (1969) 869-878
3. Wickens A.H. The dynamics of railway vehicles-from Stephenson to Carter. Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng. Part F 212 (1998) 209-226
4. Law E.H., and Cooperrider N.K. A survey of railway vehicle dynamics research. J. Dyn. Syst. Measur. Contr. (1974) 132-146
5. Ahmadian M., and Yang S. Hopf bifurcation and hunting behavior in a rail wheelset with flange contact. Non-Lin. Dyn. 15 (1998) 15-30
6. Cooperrider N.K. The hunting behavior of conventional railway trucks. J. Eng. Ind. (1972) 752-762
7. Narayanaswamy S., Dukkipati R.V., and Osman M. Analysis of modified railway passenger truck designs to improve lateral stability/curving behavior compatibility. Proc. Instut. Mech. Eng. 209 (1995) 49-59
8. Dukkipati R.V., and Narayanaswami S. Non-linear steady-state curving analysis of some unconventional rail trucks. Mech. Machine Theory 36 (2001) 507-521
9. Boocock D. Steady-state motion of railway vehicles on curved tracks. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 11 (1969) 556-566
10. Fan Y.-T., and Wu W.-F. Stability analysis and derailment evaluation of rail vehicles. Int. J. Heavy Vehicle Syst. 13 (2006) 194-211
11. Ahmed A.K.W., and Sankar S. Steady-state curving performance of railway freight truck with damper coupled wheelsets. Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 17 (1988) 195-315
12. Nagurka, M.L., Curving performance of rail passenger vehicle, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute Technology, 1983.
13. Jawahar, P.M., Mathematical simulation for lateral dynamics of conventional and unconventional railway trucks, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, 1989.
14. Mohan, A., Nonlinear investigation of the use of controllable primary suspensions to improve hunting in railway vehicles. M.S. Thesis, Virginia polytechnic Institute and State University, 2003.
15. True H. On the equivalent conicity. ZEV Rail Glasers Annalen 131 (2007) 290-298
16. Pombo J., Ambrosio J., and Silva M. A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 45 (2007) 165-189
17. Kono H., Suda Y., Yamaguchi M., Takasaki K., Hironaka Y., and Tsuda K. Curving simulation and scaled model test for LRT vehicles. Trans. JSME Part C 72 (2006) 3899-3904
18. Shabana A.A., Tobaa M., and Zaazaa K.E. Effect of the wheel geometric design on the nonlinear dynamics of railroad vehicles. J. Mech. Design Trans. ASME 128 (2006) 1130-1140
19. Saha, A.K., Bond graph modeling and dynamics of railway vehicles Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 2004.
20. Dukkipati R.V., and Amyot J.R. Computer-Aided Simulation in Railway Dynamics (1988), Marcel Dekker, New York
21. Kalker, J.J., On the rolling contact of two elastic bodies in the presence of dry friction Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delft, 1967.
22. Banerjee, N., Karmakar, R., Bond graph modeling of rail wheelset on curved track, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation (ICBGM'05), Simulation Series, 37, New Orleans, 2005, pp. 173-178.
23. Vermeulen P.J., and Johnson K.L. Contact of non-spherical elastic bodies transmitting tangential forces. J. Appl. Mech. 86 (1964) 338-340
24. Mukherjee A., Karmakar R., and Samantaray A.K. Bond Graph in Modeling. Simulation and Fault Identification (2006), CRC Press
25. Karnopp D.C., Rosenberg R.C., and Margolis D.L. System Dynamics: A Unified Approach (1990), John-Wiley and Sons Inc.
26. Pacejka H.B. Modelling complex vehicle systems using bond graphs. J. Franklin Inst. 319 (1985) 67-81
27. High-Tech Consultants: SYMBOLS 2000. STEP, IIT, Kharagpur, India, .
28. Mukherjee, A., Samantaray, A.K., System Modeling through bond graph objects on SYMBOLS 2000, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation (ICBGM-01) Simulation Series, 33, Phoenix, 2001, pp. 164-170.
29. Ould Bouamama B., Samantaray A.K., Medjaher K., Staroswiecki M., and Dauphin-Tanguy G. Model builder using functional and bond graph tools for FDI design. Control Eng. Practice 13 (2005) 875-891
30. Samantaray A.K., Medjaher K., Ould Bouamama B., Staroswiecki M., and Dauphin-Tanguy G. Component-based modelling of thermofluid systems for sensor placement and fault detection. Simulation 80 (2004) 381-398
31. Braghin F., Lewis R., Dwyer-Joyce R.S., and Bruni S. A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear 261 (2006) 1253-1264