Morphological and agronomic evaluation of tissue culture derived Indian soybean plants

Acta Agriculturae Slovenica

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 391-396

  Radhakrishnan, R ^a   Ranjitha Kumari, B D ^a  

^a BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Morphological and yield character; Somaclonal variation; Soybean; Tissue culture

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 56249110958     PISSN: 15819175     EISSN: 18541941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10014-008-0019-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barwale, U.B., Widholm, J.M. 1987. Somaclonal variation in plants regenerated from cultures of soybean. Plant Cell Rep., 6: 365 368.
2. Barwale, U.B., Widholm, J.M. 1989. Soybean: plant regeneration and somaclonal variation in soybeans. In: Bajaj YPS (Eds), Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, 3: pp. 114-133.
3. Dahleen, L.S., Stuthman, D.D. Rines, H.W. 1991. Agronomic trait variation in oat lines derived from tissue culture. Crop Sci., 31: 90-94.
4. Ducos, J.P., Alenton, R., Reano, J.F., Kanchanomai, C., Deshayes1, A. Petiard, V. 2003. Agronomic performance of Coffea canephora P. trees derived from large-scale somatic embryo production in liquid medium. Euphytica, 131: 215-223.
5. Duval, Y., Engelmann, F. Durand-Gasselin, T. 1995. Somatic embryogenesis in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq). In: Y.P.S. Bajaj (Eds), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry : Somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seed, 30: pp. 335-352.
6. Freytag, A.H., Rao-Arelli, A.P., Anand, S.C., Wrather, J.A. Owens, L.D. 1989. Somoclonal variation in soybean plants regenerated from tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep., 8: 199- 202.
7. Gamborg, O.L., Miller, R.A. Ojima, K. 1968. Nutrients requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res., 50: 151-158.
8. Graybosch, R.A., Edge, M.E. Delannay, X. 1987. Somaclonal variation in soybean plants regenerated from the cotyledonary node tissue culture system. Crop Sci., 27: 803-806.
9. Jain, S.M. 1998. Plant biotechnology and mutagenesis for sustainable crop improvement. In: R.K. Behl, D.K. Singh & G.P. Lodhi (Eds.), Crop Improvement for Stress Tolerance, , CCSHAU, Hissar & MMB, New Delhi, India. pp. 218-232.
10. Larkin, P.J., Scowcroft, W.R. 1981. Somaclonal variation - a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet., 60: 197-214.
11. Lee, M., Phillips, R.L. 1988. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. In: Briggs WR (Eds) Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39: pp. 413-437.
12. Ranch, J.P., Palmer, R.G. 1987. A ploidy variant regenerated from embryogenic tissue cultures of soybean. Soybean Genet. Newsl., 14: 161- 163.
13. Ravindra N.S., Kulkarni, R.N., Gayathri, M.C., Ramesh, S. 2004. Somaclonal variation for some morphological traits, herb yield, essential oil content and essential oil composition in an Indian cultivar of rose-scented geranium. Plant Breed., 123: 84-86
14. Stephens, P.A., Barwale-Zehr, U.B., Nickell, C.D. Widholm, J.M. 1991a. A cytoplasmicallyinherited, wrinkled-leaf mutant in soybean. J. Hered., 82:71-73.
15. Stephens, P.A., Nickel, C.D., Widholm, J.M. 1991b. Agronomic evaluation of tissue-culture-derived soybean plants. Theor. Appl. Genet., 82: 633-635.
16. Wright, M.S., Koehler, S.M., Hinchee, M.A., Carries, M.G. 1986. Plant regeneration by organogenesis in Glycine max. Plant Cell Rep., 5: 150-154.
17. Yipeng, Z., Brian, W., Grout, W., Peter, C. 2005. Variations in morphology and disease susceptibility of micropropagated rhubarb (Rheum rhaponticum) PC49, compared to conventional plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 82: 357-361.