A new framework for urban sustainability assessments: Linking complexity, information and policy

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 474-488

  Zellner, Moira L ^a   Theis, Thomas L ^a   Karunanithi, Arunprakash T ^b   Garmestani, Ahjond S ^b   Cabezas, Heriberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based modelling; Environmental assessment; Fisher Information Index; Urban sustainability

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; FISHER INFORMATION MATRIX; LEAKAGE (FLUID);

AGENT-BASED MODELLING; COMPLEX INTERACTIONS; CULTURAL ATTRIBUTES; DEGREE OF ORDERS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; FISHER INFORMATION INDEX; FUEL USES; INFORMATION INDICES; POLICY DECISIONS; POLLUTION EMISSIONS; SPATIAL SCALES; STOCKS AND FLOWS; URBAN FORMS; URBAN POLICIES; URBAN SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN SYSTEMS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DECISION ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; MODELING; POLICY STRATEGY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN ECONOMY; URBAN POLICY; URBAN POLLUTION; URBAN SOCIETY;

EID: 56249088228     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Affuma J.K., Browna A.L., and Chanb Y.C. Integrating air pollution modelling with scenario testing in road transport planning: The TRAEMS approach. The Science of the Total Environment 312 (2003) 1-14
2. Alberti M. Urban patterns and environmental performance: What do we know?. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (1999) 151-163
3. Bankes S.C. Exploratory modeling for policy analysis. Operations Research 41 3 (1993) 435-449
4. Bankes S.C. Tools and techniques for developing policies for complex and uncertain systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99 3 (2002) 7263-7266
5. Bankes S.C., Lempert R., and Popper S. Making computational social science effective: Epistemology, methodology, and technology. Social Science Computer Review 20 4 (2002) 377-388
6. Bogart W.T. The economics of cities and suburbs. 1st. ed. (1998), Prentice-Hall
7. Brown, D. G., & Robinson, D. T. (2006). Effects of heterogeneity in residential preferences on an agent-based model of urban sprawl. Ecology and Society: Special Feature on Empirical based agent-based modeling 11 (1): .
8. Cabezas H., Pawlowski C., Mayer A., and Hoagland N. Sustainable systems theory: Ecological and other aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 5 (2005) 455-467
9. Cabezas H., Pawlowski C., Mayer M., and Hoagland N. Sustainability: Ecological, social, economic, technological, and systems perspectives. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy 5 (2003) 167-180
10. Caruso G., Rounsevell M., and Cojocaru G. Exploring a spatio-dynamic neighbourhood-based model of residential behaviour in the Brussels periurban area. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19 2 (2005) 103-123
11. Chin N. Unearthing the roots of urban sprawl: A critical analysis of form function and methodology. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA) Working Paper Series (2002), University College London, London
12. Clarke K.C. The limits of simplicity: Toward geocomputational honesty in urban modeling. In: Atkinson P., Foody G., Darby S., and Wu F. (Eds). GeoDynamics (2005), CRC Press, Boca Raton
13. Deadman P., Robinson D.T., Moran E., and Brondizio T. Colonist household decisionmaking and land-use change in the Amazon Rainforest: An agent-based simulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 5 (2004) 693-709
14. Deakin M., Mitchell G., Nijkamp P., and Vreeker R. Sustainable urban development. The environmental assessment methods vol. 2 (2007), Routledge, New York
15. Department of Energy (2005). Average residential monthly use (of electricity) (cited March 28, 2007). .
16. Downs A. New visions for metropolitan America (1994), The Brookings Institution/Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington, DC/Cambridge
17. Ducrot R., Le Page C., Bommel P., and Kuper M. Articulating land and water dynamics with urbanization: An attempt to model natural resources management at the urban edge. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28 1-2 (2004) 85-106
18. Ehrenhalt A. Sprawl, passion and common sense. Governing Magazine (2000) April
19. Ewing R.H. Characteristics, causes and effects of sprawl: A literature review. Environmental and Urban Issues 21 2 (1994) 1-15
20. Ewing R.H. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?. Journal of American Planning Association 63 1 (1997) 107-126
21. Fath B., Cabezas H., and Pawlowski C. Regime changes in ecological systems: An information theory approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 222 4 (2003) 517-530
22. Fisher R.A. Theory of statistical estimation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (1925), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Frieden B.R. Science from Fisher information: A unification (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
24. Garde A.M. New urbanism as sustainable growth? A supply side story and its implications for public policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 2 (2004) 154-170
25. Garreau J. Edge city (1991), Anchor Books, New York
26. Gordon P., and Richardson H.W. Defending Urban Sprawl. Public Interest Spring (2000)
27. Guindon B., and Zhang Y. Using satellite remote sensing to survey transport-related urban sustainability Part II. Results of a Canadian urban assessment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 9 (2007) 276-293
28. Hanley P.F., and Hopkins L.D. Do sewer extension plans affect urban development? A multiagent simulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34 1 (2007) 6-27
29. Heilbrun J. Urban economics and public policy. 3rd ed. (1987), St. Martin's Press, New York
30. Henderson R., and Moore A.T. Plan obsolescence. Reason 30 2 (1998)
31. Hirsch W.Z. Urban economics (1984), Macmillan Publishing Company, New York
32. Hoffman M., Kelley H., and Evans T. Simulating land-cover change in South-Central Indiana: An agent-based model of deforestation and afforestation. In: Janssen M. (Ed). Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent approaches (2003), Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton, MA
33. Holland J.H. Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity (1995), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Helix Books
34. Karunanithi A.T., Cabezas H., Frieden R., and Pawlowski C. Detection and assessment of ecosystem regime shifts from Fisher information. Ecology and Society 13 1 (2008) 22. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art22/ Available from:
35. Lee Jr. D.B. Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39 (1973) 163-178
36. Manson S. Challenges in evaluating models of geographic complexity. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design (2007) [advance online publication]
37. Mayer A., Pawlowski C., and Cabezas H. Fisher information and dynamic regime changes in ecological systems. Ecological Modeling (2006)
38. Mayer A., Thurston H., and Pawlowski C. The multidisciplinary influence of common sustainability indices. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2 8 (2004) 419-426
39. McKee D.L., and McKee Y.A. Edge cities and the viability of metropolitan economics: Contributions to flexibility and external linkages by new urban service environments. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60 1 (2001)
40. Miller J.H., and Page S.E. Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life (2007), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
41. Neuman Michael. The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 1 (2005) 11-26
42. Norton R.K. Planning for school facilities: School board decision making and local coordination in Michigan. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26 4 (2007) 478-496
43. O'Sullivan D., and Torrens P.M. Cellular automata and urban simulation: Where do we go from here?. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28 (2001) 163-168
44. Parker D.C., Manson S.M., Janssen A., Hoffman M., and Deadman P. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 2 (2003) 314-337
45. Parker D.C., and Meretsky V. Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: From Pattern to Process: Landscape Fragmentation and the Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Change 101 2-3 (2004) 233-250
46. Pawlowski C., Fath B., Mayer A., and Cabezas H. Towards a sustainability index using information theory. Energy 30 8 (2005) 1221-1231
47. Rand, W., Zellner, M. L., Page, S. E., Riolo, R. L., Brown, D. G., & Fernandez, L. E. (2002). The complex interaction of agents and environments: An example in urban sprawl. Paper read at Agent 2002 conference on social agents: Ecology, exchange and evolution, at Chicago, IL.
48. Rees W. Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability. Population & Environment 17 3 (1996) 195-215
49. Sadownik B., and Jaccard M. Sustainable energy and urban form in China: The relevance of community energy management. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 55-65
50. Torrens P.M. Simulating sprawl. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 2 (2006) 248-275
51. University of Michigan (2001). Detroit Area Study 2001 [cited. .
52. US Environmental Protection Agency (2006). Clean Energy: Air Emissions. [cited April 16, 2007. .
53. van de Coevering P., and Schwanen T. Re-evaluating the impact of urban form on travel patterns in Europe and North-America. Transport Policy 13 (2006) 229-239
54. Yin L., and Muller B. Residential location and the biophysical environment: Exurban development agents in a heterogeneous landscape. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design (2007) [advance online publication]
55. Zellner M.L. Generating policies for sustainable water use in complex scenarios: An integrated land-use and water-use model of Monroe County, Michigan. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34 4 (2007) 664-686