Enabling automated traceability maintenance by recognizing development activities applied to models

ASE 2008 - 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 49-58

  Mäder, Patrick ^a   Gotel, Orlena ^b   Philippow, Ilka ^a  

^a ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b PACE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated traceability maintenance; Change management; Development activity recognition; Rule based traceability

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; MAINTENANCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATED APPROACHES; AUTOMATED TRACEABILITY MAINTENANCE; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENTS; DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES; DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; RULE-BASED TRACEABILITY; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENTS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL DETAILS; UML MODELS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 56249083603     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2008.15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. P. Arkley and S. Riddle. Overcoming the traceability benefit problem. In Proc. 13th Int'l Requirements Eng. Conf., pages 385-389. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
2. J. Cleland-Huang, C. K. Chang, and Y. Ge. Supporting event based traceability through high-level recognition of change events. In COMPSAC, pages 595-602. IEEE CS, 2002.
3. A. Egyed, P. Grünbacher, M. Heindl, and S. Biffl. Value-based requirements traceability: Lessons learned. In Proc. 15th Int'l Requirements Eng. Conf., pages 115-118, 2007.
4. G. Engels, R. Heckel, J. M. Küster, and L. Groenewegen. Consistency-preserving model evolution through transformations. In 5th Int'l UML Conf., volume 2460 of LNCS, pages 212-226, Dresden, 2002. Springer.
5. Extessy AG. ToolNET. www.extessy.com.
6. O. C. Z. Gotel and A. C. W. Finkelstein. An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. In First International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE'94), pages 94-101. IEEE CS Press, 1994.
7. B. Hnatkowska, Z. Huzar, L. Kuzniarz, and L. Tuzinkiewicz. Refinement relationship between collaborations. In Proc. WRKUMLCP II, pages 51-57. IEEE CS, San Francisco, USA, 2003.
8. K. Lano. Advanced systems design with Java, UML, and MDA. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005.
9. D. Luckham. The Power of Events: An Introduction to Complex Event Processing in Distributed Enterprise Systems. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading/MA, May 2002.
10. P. Mäder, O. Gotel, and I. Philippow. Rule-based maintenance of post-requirements traceability relations. In Proc. 16th Int'l Req. Eng. Conf., 2008.
11. W. Shen, Y. Lu, and W. L. Low. Extending the UML metamodel to support software refinement. In Proc. WRKUMLCP II, pages 35-42. IEEE CS, San Francisco, USA, 2003.
12. J. van Bemmel, P. Dockhorn, and I. Widya. Paradigm: Event-driven Computing. White paper TI/RS/2004/051, Lucent Technologies, CTIT, 2004. https://doc.telin.nl/dscgi/ds.py/Get/ File-48190.