Likelihood of using drug courts: Predictions using procedural justice and the theory of planned behavior

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 543-553

  Maeder, Evelyn M ^a   Wiener, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POVERTY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RISK REDUCTION; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COERCION; CRIMINAL LAW; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEBRASKA; POVERTY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 56149123201     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: 10990798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.819     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.
3. Bouffard, J., & Taxman, F. (2004). Looking inside the "black box" of drug court treatment services using direct observations. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 195-218.
4. Cooper, C. S. (2003). Drug courts: Current issues and future perspectives. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 1671-1711.
5. Cosden, M., Basch, J. E., Campos, E., Greenwell, A., Barazani, S., & Walker, S. (2006). Effects of motivation and problem severity on court-based drug treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 599-618.
6. Hepburn, J. R., & Harvey, A. N. (2007). The effect of the threat of legal sanction on program retention and completion: Is that why they stay in drug court? Crime and Delinquency, 53, 255-280.
7. Kleinman, B. P., Millery, M., & Scimeca, M. (2002). Predicting long-term treatment utilization among addicts entering detoxification: The contribution of help-seeking models. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 209-230.
8. Maxwell, S. R. (2000). Sanction threats in court-ordered programs: Examining their effects on offenders mandated into drug treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 542-564.
9. Miethe, T., Lu, H., & Reese, E. (2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 522-541.
10. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components.
11. Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117-125.
12. Wenzel, M. (2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 629-645.
13. Wiener, R. L., Baron-Donovan, C., & Gross, K. (2005). Debtor education, financial literacy, and pending bankruptcy legislation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 347-366.
14. Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459-487.
15. Young, D., & Belenko, S. (2002). Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 297-328.