Accounting for management and organisational factors in risk analysis of marine operations

Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2007, ESREL 2007 - Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 51-60

  Trbojevic, V M ^a   Gudmestad, O T ^b   Rettedal, W K ^c  

^a Risk Support Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^c STATOIL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT; METAL RECOVERY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY FACTOR;

BARRIER FAILURES; BOW TIES; FAILURE MODELS; MARINE INDUSTRIES; MARINE OPERATIONS; OPERATIONAL SAFETIES; SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; UNDERLYING CAUSES;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 56149118538     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Aven, T., Sklet, S. & Vinnem, J.E. 2006. Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release) Part I. Method description. Journal of Hazardous Materials A137, 681-691.
2. HSE. 2002. Offshore Hydrocarbon Releases Statistics and Analysis 2002, HID Statistics Report, HSR 2002 002, February.
3. Hollnagel, E. 1999. Accident analysis and barrier function, in Accidents and barriers project TRAIN, Version 1.0, February.
4. Hurst, N.W, Bellamy, L.J., Geyer, T.A. & Astley, J.A. 1991. A Classification Scheme for Pipework Failures to Include human and Socio-Technical Errors and their Contribution to Pipework Failure Frequencies, Journal of Hazardous Materials 26, 159-186.
5. Hurst, N.W., Bellamy, L.J. & Wright, M.S. 1992. Research Models of Safety Management of Onshore Major Hazards and Their Application to Offshore Safety. Proce. Of a Conference on Major Hazards: Onshore and Offshore. IChemE Symposium Series No. 130. Rugby, UK.
6. IMO, 2002a. Guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO decision making process, MSC/Circ.1023-MEPC/Circ.392, 5 April.
7. IMO. 2002b. ISM Code - International Safety Management Code and Revised Guidelines for Implementation of the ISM Code, International Maritime Organisation, London.
8. Murphy, D.M. & Pate-Cornell, M.E. 1996. The SAM framework: modelling the effects of management factors on human behaviour in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 16, 501-515.
9. NPD. 2002. Regulations relating to health, environment and safety in the petroleum activities. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD), Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT), Norwegian Social and Health Directorate (NSHD).
10. Oh, J.I.H., Brouwer, W.G.J., Bellamy, L.J., Hale, A.R., Ale, B. & Papazoglou, I.A. 1998. The I-RISK project: development of an integrated technical and management risk control and monitoring methodology for managing and quantifying on-site and off-site risks. In: Mosleh, A. & Bari, R. editors. Proc. Of the International Conference on probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 4 (PSAM 4). New York. Springer, p.2485-91.
11. Øien, K. 2001. A framework for the establishment of organisational risk indicators, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 74, 147-167.
12. Rankin, W. & Krichbaum, L. 1998. Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance. Integration of Recent HRA Developments with Applications to Maintenance in Aircraft and Nuclear Settings. Seattle. Washington. USA.
13. Reason, J. 1998. Managing the Risks of Organisational Accidents, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot.
14. Sklet, S. 2006. Safety barriers: Definition, classification and performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the process Industries, 19, 494-506.
15. Swain, A.D. and Guttmann, H.E. 1983. Handbook for Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power plant Applications: Final Report. NUREG/CR - 1278. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
16. Williams, J.C. 1986. HEART - A proposed method for assessing and reducing human error. Proceedings, 9th Advances in Reliability Technology Symposium, University of Bradford. NCRS, UKAEA. Cultech, Cheshire.
17. Wreathall, J., Schurman, D.L., Modarres, M., Anderson, N., Roush, M.L. & Mosleh, A. 1992. US Regulatory Commission: a framework and method for the amalgamation of performance indicators at nuclear power plants. Report NUREG-5610, vols. 1 and 2. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA.