|
|
Volumn 248, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 895-
|
|
A randomized controlled clinical trial on sentinel node lymph node dissection versus axillary lymph node dissection: A matter of technique or patient selection?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
AXILLARY LYMPH NODE;
BREAST CANCER;
CANCER RECURRENCE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
LYMPH NODE DISSECTION;
METASTASIS;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RECURRENCE RISK;
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE;
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
AXILLA;
BREAST TUMOR;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
LYMPH NODE METASTASIS;
LYMPHADENECTOMY;
NOTE;
PATHOLOGY;
TUMOR RECURRENCE;
CANCER SURGERY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PRIMARY TUMOR;
RELIABILITY;
SURGEON;
AXILLA;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LYMPH NODE EXCISION;
LYMPHATIC METASTASIS;
NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL;
PATIENT SELECTION;
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;
|
|
EID: 56149118479
PISSN: 00034932
EISSN: 15281140
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b74cf Document Type: Letter |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (4)
|
