Consideration of human actions in combination with the probabilistic dynamics method MCDET

Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2007, ESREL 2007 - Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 1069-1077

  Kloos, M ^a   Peschke, J ^a  

^a GESELLSCHAFT FÜR ANLAGEN UND REAKTORSICHERHEIT GRS MBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; CODES (SYMBOLS); ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PEELING; POWER PLANTS; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY;

DETERMINISTIC DYNAMICS; DISCRETE DYNAMICS; DYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMAN ACTIONS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS; OPERATOR PERFORMANCES; PHYSICAL PROCESSES; PROBABILISTIC DYNAMICS; PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS; PROCESS DYNAMICS; SAFETY ASSESSMENTS; TECHNICAL SYSTEMS; TIME AXIS;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 56149115538     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Dang V.N. & Siu N.O. 1996. The OPSIM Dynamic Operator-Plant Model: Implementation and Some Results, Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, PSA-96, Vol. I, 253-260.
2. Devooght J. & Smidts C. 1996. Probabilistic dynamics as a tool for dynamic PSA. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 52, 185-196.
3. Gauntt R.O. et al. 2000. MELCOR Computer Code Manuals, Vol. 1: Primer and Users' Guide, Version 1.8.5, NUREG/CR-6119 Rev. 2, SAND2000-2417/1.
4. Kloos M. & Peschke J. 2006. MCDET - A Probabilistic Dynamics Method Combining Monte Carlo Simulation with the Discrete Dynamic Event Tree Approach, Nuclear Science and Engineering 153, 137-156.
5. Labeau P.E., Smidts C. & Swaminathan S. 2000. Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 68 219-254.
6. Mosleh A. & Chang Y.H. 2004. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 83, 241-253.
7. Peschke J., Fassmann W., Kloos M. & Sonnenkalb M. 2006. Methodenentwicklung für die Berücksichtigung menschlicher Eingriffe im Rahmen einer dynamischen PSA der Stufen 1 und 2, Abschlussbericht, GRS-A-3340, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit, Germany.
8. Shukri T., Mosleh A. & Shen S.H. 1997. Implementation of a Cognitive Human Reliability Model in Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of a Nuclear Power Plant (ADS-IDA), UMNE-97, Center for Technology Risk Studies, University of Maryland, College Park.
9. Siu N. 1994. Risk assessment for dynamic systems: An overview, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 43, 43-73.
10. Swain A.D. 1987. Accident Sequences Evaluation Program Human Reliability Analysis Procedure, Washington (DC): US NRC.