Variability of the standard reference height and its influence on the stereometric parameters of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 4881-4885

  Breusegem, Christophe ^a   Fieuws, Steffen ^b   Stalmans, Ingeborg ^a   Zeyen, Thierry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE EXAMINATION; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; RETINA; RETINA NERVE CELL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; STEREOMETRY; THICKNESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 56149114104     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2331     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363:1711-1720.
2. Khaw PT, Shah P, Elkington AR. Glaucoma 1: diagnosis. BMJ. 2004;328:97-99.
3. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:62-65. (Pubitemid 23022890)
4. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:333-354.
5. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Relationships between standard automated perimetry, HRT confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and GDx VCC scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4182-4188. (Pubitemid 44264621)
6. Ervin JC, Lemij HG, Mills RP, Quigley HA, Thompson HW, Burgoyne CF. Clinician change detection viewing longitudinal stereophotographs compared to confocal scanning laser tomography in the LSU Experimental Glaucoma (LEG) Study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:467-481.
7. Kalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B. Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph - new graphical analysis of optic disc topography changes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:654-662. (Pubitemid 43923185)
8. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, Glaucoma Module. Operating Instructions Software Version 3.0. Heidelberg: Heidelberg Engineering GmbH; 2005.
9. Hoffmann EM, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, et al. Agreement among 3 optical imaging methods for the assessment of optic disc topography. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:2149-2156. (Pubitemid 41720994)
10. Giangiacomo A, Garway-Heath D, Caprioli J. Diagnosing glaucoma progression: current practice and promising technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:153-162. (Pubitemid 43790811)
11. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1492-1499.
12. Kourkoutas D, Buys YM, Flanagan JG, Hatch WV, Balian C, Trope GE. Comparison of glaucoma progression evaluated with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II versus optic nerve head stereophotographs. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42:82-88. (Pubitemid 46408899)
13. Verdonck N, Zeyen T, Van Malderen L, Spileers W. Short-term intra-individual variability in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2002;286:51-57.
14. Quan H, Shih WJ. Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models. Biometrics. 1996;52:1195-1203. (Pubitemid 26425271)
15. Thiebaut R, Jacqmin-Gadda H, Chêne G, Leport C, Commenges D. Bivariate linear mixed models using SAS PROC MIXED. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2002;69:249-256. (Pubitemid 36158677)
16. Burk RO, Vihanninjoki K, Bartke T, et al. Development of the standard reference plane for the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:375-384. (Pubitemid 30342657)
17. Park KH, Caprioli J. Development of a novel reference plane for the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph with optical coherence tomography measurements. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:385-391.
18. Tan JC, White E, Poinoosawmy D, Hitchings RA. Validity of rim area measurements by different reference planes. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:245-250. (Pubitemid 38669078)
19. Vihanninjoki K, Burk RO, Teesalu P, Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Optic disc biomorphometry with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph at different reference levels. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:47-53. (Pubitemid 34506343)
20. Strouthidis NG, White ET, Owen VM, Ho TA, Garway-Heath DF. Improving the repeatability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II rim area measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1433-1437. (Pubitemid 41527376)
21. Strouthidis NG, White ET, Owen VM, Ho TA, Hammond CJ, Garway-Heath DF. Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1427-1432. (Pubitemid 41527375)
22. Tan JC, Garway-Heath DF, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Reasons for rim area variability in scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1126-1131. (Pubitemid 36297830)
23. Miglior S, Albé E, Guareschi M, Rossetti L, Orzalesi N. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1072-1077. (Pubitemid 34546913)
24. Owen VM, Strouthidis NG, Garway-Heath DF, Crabb DP. Measurement variability in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph imaging of neuroretinal rim area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5322-5330.